Schroth and Asymmetric Spinal Stabilization Exercises' Effectiveness on Back Pain and Trunk Muscle Endurance in Adolescents' Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Q2 Medicine Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran Pub Date : 2024-08-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.47176/mjiri.38.90
Arash Khaledi, Hooman Minoonejad, Hassan Daneshmandi, Mahdieh Akoochakian, Mehdi Gheitasi
{"title":"Schroth and Asymmetric Spinal Stabilization Exercises' Effectiveness on Back Pain and Trunk Muscle Endurance in Adolescents' Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Arash Khaledi, Hooman Minoonejad, Hassan Daneshmandi, Mahdieh Akoochakian, Mehdi Gheitasi","doi":"10.47176/mjiri.38.90","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Millions of people worldwide suffer from back pain and muscle weakness due to adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). It has been found that Schroth exercises (SE) are the most effective treatment for AIS. However, it is still not clear how combining SE with asymmetric spinal stabilization exercises (ASSE) can impact back pain and trunk extensor muscle endurance (TE). This study aims to compare the effects of SE with and without ASSE on back pain and TE in AIS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 40 boys aged 10 to 18 years who had AIS. They were divided into three groups: SE+ASSE (n = 15), SE only (n = 15), and a waitlist control (n = 10). The participants underwent exercise training for 50-70 minutes three times a week for up to 12 weeks. The study evaluated two variables, namely, back pain (measured with a Visual Analog Scale or VAS) and TE (measured with the Biering-Sorensen test), before and after the interventions. For statistical analysis, a post-hoc Bonferroni test following analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used at α = 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to a study, patients who underwent a combination of SE and ASSE experienced a significant reduction in back pain (VAS score = 2.9±0.8 to 0.1±0.4) as compared to those who only underwent SE (VAS = 2.7±0.9 to 1.5±1.2) and the control group. No significant difference was found between the SE group and the control group in terms of back pain reduction. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in TE among the three groups. However, the combined exercises showed a numerical improvement (75.6±52.5 sec to 119.2±62.6 sec) compared to the other groups (<i>P</i> = 0.311).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of SE and ASSE is more effective in reducing back pain in AIS than SE alone or control. Although there was no significant difference between the three groups in terms of improving the TE, the SE and ASSE groups showed better results numerically.</p>","PeriodicalId":18361,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran","volume":"38 ","pages":"90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11644102/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.38.90","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Millions of people worldwide suffer from back pain and muscle weakness due to adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). It has been found that Schroth exercises (SE) are the most effective treatment for AIS. However, it is still not clear how combining SE with asymmetric spinal stabilization exercises (ASSE) can impact back pain and trunk extensor muscle endurance (TE). This study aims to compare the effects of SE with and without ASSE on back pain and TE in AIS.

Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 40 boys aged 10 to 18 years who had AIS. They were divided into three groups: SE+ASSE (n = 15), SE only (n = 15), and a waitlist control (n = 10). The participants underwent exercise training for 50-70 minutes three times a week for up to 12 weeks. The study evaluated two variables, namely, back pain (measured with a Visual Analog Scale or VAS) and TE (measured with the Biering-Sorensen test), before and after the interventions. For statistical analysis, a post-hoc Bonferroni test following analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used at α = 0.05.

Results: According to a study, patients who underwent a combination of SE and ASSE experienced a significant reduction in back pain (VAS score = 2.9±0.8 to 0.1±0.4) as compared to those who only underwent SE (VAS = 2.7±0.9 to 1.5±1.2) and the control group. No significant difference was found between the SE group and the control group in terms of back pain reduction. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in TE among the three groups. However, the combined exercises showed a numerical improvement (75.6±52.5 sec to 119.2±62.6 sec) compared to the other groups (P = 0.311).

Conclusion: The combination of SE and ASSE is more effective in reducing back pain in AIS than SE alone or control. Although there was no significant difference between the three groups in terms of improving the TE, the SE and ASSE groups showed better results numerically.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
施罗特和不对称脊柱稳定练习对青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者背痛和躯干肌肉耐力的疗效:随机对照试验》。
背景:全世界有数百万人因青少年特发性脊柱侧弯症(AIS)而遭受背痛和肌肉无力之苦。研究发现,施罗思运动(SE)是治疗 AIS 最有效的方法。然而,目前还不清楚将施罗思运动与不对称脊柱稳定运动(ASSE)相结合会对背痛和躯干伸肌耐力(TE)产生怎样的影响。本研究旨在比较 SE 与不对称脊柱稳定运动对 AIS 背痛和躯干伸肌耐力的影响:这项随机对照试验有 40 名 10 至 18 岁的 AIS 男孩参加。他们被分为三组:SE+ASSE组(15人)、仅SE组(15人)和候补对照组(10人)。参与者接受每周三次、每次 50-70 分钟的运动训练,训练时间最长为 12 周。研究评估了干预前后的两个变量,即背痛(用视觉模拟量表或 VAS 测量)和 TE(用 Biering-Sorensen 测试测量)。在进行统计分析时,在α = 0.05的协方差分析(ANCOVA)基础上进行了事后Bonferroni检验:一项研究显示,与仅接受 SE(VAS = 2.7±0.9 至 1.5±1.2)治疗的患者和对照组相比,接受 SE 和 ASSE 联合治疗的患者背部疼痛明显减轻(VAS 评分 = 2.9±0.8 至 0.1±0.4)。在减轻背痛方面,SE 组与对照组没有明显差异。此外,三组的 TE 也没有明显差异。然而,与其他组相比,联合练习在数值上有所改善(75.6±52.5 秒到 119.2±62.6秒)(P = 0.311):结论:在减轻 AIS 背痛方面,SE 和 ASSE 的组合比单独使用 SE 或对照组更有效。虽然三组在改善 TE 方面没有明显差异,但 SE 和 ASSE 组在数值上显示出更好的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Narrative Intervention on Spoken Narrative and Reading Comprehension Abilities in Farsi-Speaking Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Association between Major Dietary Patterns at Breakfast and Odds of Major Depressive Disorder: A Case-control Study. The Effect of Mixed Articulation Therapy on Perceptual and Acoustic Features of Compensatory Errors in Children with Cleft Palate. Aortic Calcification in Patients with Nephrolithiasis: A Cross-Sectional Case-Control Study. Association of Obesity, Sarcopenia, and Functional Mobility with Risk of Fall: A Cross-Sectional Study from Ardakan Cohort Study on Aging (ACSA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1