Living well with advanced cancer: a scoping review of non-pharmacological supportive care interventions.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Journal of Cancer Survivorship Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1007/s11764-024-01714-z
Brinda Kumar, Moe Thet Htaa, Kim Kerin-Ayres, Andrea L Smith, Judith Lacey, Sarah Bishop Browne, Suzanne Grant
{"title":"Living well with advanced cancer: a scoping review of non-pharmacological supportive care interventions.","authors":"Brinda Kumar, Moe Thet Htaa, Kim Kerin-Ayres, Andrea L Smith, Judith Lacey, Sarah Bishop Browne, Suzanne Grant","doi":"10.1007/s11764-024-01714-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The increasing number of people living longer with advanced cancer presents unique physical, psychosocial, financial, legal, practical and complex care needs. Supportive care interventions aim to address these needs by improving symptom management, promoting wellbeing, enhancing quality of life and potentially improving prognosis. To integrate supportive care interventions into clinical practice, a comprehensive review of existing studies is needed. This scoping review maps the evidence on non-pharmacological supportive care interventions for people with advanced cancer and identifies gaps to inform future research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched four electronic databases-CINAHL, Medline, Cochrane and PsycINFO-for peer-reviewed original research on non-pharmacological supportive care interventions for adults with advanced cancer, published from January 1, 2013, to July 1, 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 3716 studies, 84 publications met the inclusion criteria. These studies were categorised into key supportive care domains: physical activity, psychosocial support, patient care and autonomy, multimodal approaches and others. Most publications focused on interventions addressing physical and psychosocial needs, showing benefits such as reduced fatigue, pain and improved mood. However, significant gaps were found in research on interventions addressing practical needs essential to autonomy, including health system and information needs, patient care and support and financial needs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mapping the studies to the needs of the advanced cancer population showed that domains with greatest unmet needs have the fewest interventions available. Our scoping review suggests that non-pharmacological supportive care interventions can improve the wellbeing and quality of life of people living with advanced cancer. However, addressing methodological limitations requires further large-scale, multi-centre studies focusing on the identified gaps to inform the implementation of suitable supportive care programs.</p><p><strong>Implications for cancer survivors: </strong>Non-pharmacological interventions can boost wellbeing and quality of life for advanced cancer survivors, but addressing gaps in practical and systemic support is crucial.</p>","PeriodicalId":15284,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Survivorship","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Survivorship","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-024-01714-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The increasing number of people living longer with advanced cancer presents unique physical, psychosocial, financial, legal, practical and complex care needs. Supportive care interventions aim to address these needs by improving symptom management, promoting wellbeing, enhancing quality of life and potentially improving prognosis. To integrate supportive care interventions into clinical practice, a comprehensive review of existing studies is needed. This scoping review maps the evidence on non-pharmacological supportive care interventions for people with advanced cancer and identifies gaps to inform future research.

Methods: We systematically searched four electronic databases-CINAHL, Medline, Cochrane and PsycINFO-for peer-reviewed original research on non-pharmacological supportive care interventions for adults with advanced cancer, published from January 1, 2013, to July 1, 2024.

Results: Out of 3716 studies, 84 publications met the inclusion criteria. These studies were categorised into key supportive care domains: physical activity, psychosocial support, patient care and autonomy, multimodal approaches and others. Most publications focused on interventions addressing physical and psychosocial needs, showing benefits such as reduced fatigue, pain and improved mood. However, significant gaps were found in research on interventions addressing practical needs essential to autonomy, including health system and information needs, patient care and support and financial needs.

Conclusion: Mapping the studies to the needs of the advanced cancer population showed that domains with greatest unmet needs have the fewest interventions available. Our scoping review suggests that non-pharmacological supportive care interventions can improve the wellbeing and quality of life of people living with advanced cancer. However, addressing methodological limitations requires further large-scale, multi-centre studies focusing on the identified gaps to inform the implementation of suitable supportive care programs.

Implications for cancer survivors: Non-pharmacological interventions can boost wellbeing and quality of life for advanced cancer survivors, but addressing gaps in practical and systemic support is crucial.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生活与晚期癌症:非药物支持护理干预的范围审查。
目的:越来越多的晚期癌症患者在身体、社会心理、经济、法律、实际操作和复杂护理方面都有独特的需求。支持性护理干预措施旨在通过改善症状管理、促进身心健康、提高生活质量和改善预后来满足这些需求。要将支持性护理干预措施纳入临床实践,需要对现有研究进行全面回顾。本范围界定综述描绘了晚期癌症患者非药物支持性护理干预措施的证据,并找出了差距,为今后的研究提供参考:我们系统地检索了四个电子数据库--CINAHL、Medline、Cochrane 和 PsycINFO,以获取自 2013 年 1 月 1 日至 2024 年 7 月 1 日期间发表的、经同行评审的有关晚期癌症成人非药物支持性护理干预措施的原创研究:在 3716 项研究中,有 84 篇出版物符合纳入标准。这些研究按支持性护理的主要领域进行了分类:体育活动、社会心理支持、患者护理和自主性、多模式方法及其他。大多数出版物侧重于针对身体和社会心理需求的干预措施,显示了减轻疲劳、疼痛和改善情绪等益处。然而,在针对对自主性至关重要的实际需求(包括医疗系统和信息需求、患者护理和支持以及经济需求)的干预措施方面,研究发现存在重大差距:结论:根据晚期癌症患者的需求开展的研究表明,未满足需求最大的领域所采取的干预措施最少。我们的范围界定综述表明,非药物支持性护理干预措施可以改善晚期癌症患者的福利和生活质量。然而,要解决方法上的局限性,还需要进一步开展大规模、多中心的研究,重点关注已发现的差距,为实施合适的支持性护理计划提供信息:非药物干预措施可以提高晚期癌症幸存者的生活质量和幸福感,但解决实际和系统性支持方面的差距至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
10.80%
发文量
149
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer survivorship is a worldwide concern. The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to provide a global forum for new knowledge related to cancer survivorship. The journal publishes peer-reviewed papers relevant to improving the understanding, prevention, and management of the multiple areas related to cancer survivorship that can affect quality of care, access to care, longevity, and quality of life. It is a forum for research on humans (both laboratory and clinical), clinical studies, systematic and meta-analytic literature reviews, policy studies, and in rare situations case studies as long as they provide a new observation that should be followed up on to improve outcomes related to cancer survivors. Published articles represent a broad range of fields including oncology, primary care, physical medicine and rehabilitation, many other medical and nursing specialties, nursing, health services research, physical and occupational therapy, public health, behavioral medicine, psychology, social work, evidence-based policy, health economics, biobehavioral mechanisms, and qualitative analyses. The journal focuses exclusively on adult cancer survivors, young adult cancer survivors, and childhood cancer survivors who are young adults. Submissions must target those diagnosed with and treated for cancer.
期刊最新文献
Strategies to improve participation in exercise programmes during chemotherapy: a modified nominal group technique. Organizing substitution of oncological follow-up to primary care: perspectives from secondary care providers. Beyond survival: the journal of cancer survivorship: research and practice (JCS). Short-term employment changes of men newly diagnosed with cancer: well-being of cancer survivors at work study (WeCanWork). What does an AI-generated "cancer survivor" look like? An analysis of images generated by text-to-image tools.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1