Risk factors of long-term brain health outcomes after hospitalization for critical illness.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Neurology Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1007/s00415-024-12786-3
C Peinkhofer, C S Grønkjær, L E Bang, L Fonsmark, J-U Stæhr Jensen, T L Katzenstein, J Kjaergaard, A Lebech, C Merie, V Nersesjan, P Sivapalan, P Zarifkar, Michael E Benros, Daniel Kondziella
{"title":"Risk factors of long-term brain health outcomes after hospitalization for critical illness.","authors":"C Peinkhofer, C S Grønkjær, L E Bang, L Fonsmark, J-U Stæhr Jensen, T L Katzenstein, J Kjaergaard, A Lebech, C Merie, V Nersesjan, P Sivapalan, P Zarifkar, Michael E Benros, Daniel Kondziella","doi":"10.1007/s00415-024-12786-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Brain health may be impaired years after hospitalization for critical illness, and similar impairments occur after hospitalization for COVID-19. However, it remains unclear which patients are most likely to experience long-term brain health consequences and whether these adverse events differ between non-COVID critical illness and COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a prospective observational study, we enrolled patients hospitalized for (1) non-COVID critical illness (pneumonia, myocardial infarction, or ICU-requiring conditions) or for (2) COVID-19, from March 2020 to June 2021. Brain health was assessed at 18-month follow-up with cognitive, psychiatric, and neurological tests. We used both logistic regression and prediction models to test for associations between different variables and brain health.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 245 patients: 125 hospitalized for non-COVID critical illness and 120 for COVID-19 [mean age 61.2 (± 13.6) years, 42% women]. Brain health was impaired in 76% of patients (72% critical illness, 81% COVID-19; p = 0.14) at 18-month follow-up. The strongest predictive factors associated with impaired brain health were education < 13 years, age ≥ 70 years, and neuroticism traits in the best performing model (AUC = 0.63). When analyzing non-COVID critical illness and COVID-19 patients separately, low education was one of the few factors associated with impaired brain health in both groups (AUCs for best models: 0.66 and 0.69).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Brain health is comparably impaired after hospitalization for critical illness and COVID-19. Factors like higher age, lower education and neuroticism may help identifying vulnerable individuals, who could benefit from close monitoring to improve brain health after critical illness, regardless of the underlying disease etiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":16558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology","volume":"272 1","pages":"71"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-024-12786-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Brain health may be impaired years after hospitalization for critical illness, and similar impairments occur after hospitalization for COVID-19. However, it remains unclear which patients are most likely to experience long-term brain health consequences and whether these adverse events differ between non-COVID critical illness and COVID-19.

Methods: In a prospective observational study, we enrolled patients hospitalized for (1) non-COVID critical illness (pneumonia, myocardial infarction, or ICU-requiring conditions) or for (2) COVID-19, from March 2020 to June 2021. Brain health was assessed at 18-month follow-up with cognitive, psychiatric, and neurological tests. We used both logistic regression and prediction models to test for associations between different variables and brain health.

Results: We included 245 patients: 125 hospitalized for non-COVID critical illness and 120 for COVID-19 [mean age 61.2 (± 13.6) years, 42% women]. Brain health was impaired in 76% of patients (72% critical illness, 81% COVID-19; p = 0.14) at 18-month follow-up. The strongest predictive factors associated with impaired brain health were education < 13 years, age ≥ 70 years, and neuroticism traits in the best performing model (AUC = 0.63). When analyzing non-COVID critical illness and COVID-19 patients separately, low education was one of the few factors associated with impaired brain health in both groups (AUCs for best models: 0.66 and 0.69).

Conclusion: Brain health is comparably impaired after hospitalization for critical illness and COVID-19. Factors like higher age, lower education and neuroticism may help identifying vulnerable individuals, who could benefit from close monitoring to improve brain health after critical illness, regardless of the underlying disease etiology.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背景:危重病住院数年后,脑健康可能会受到损害,而 COVID-19 住院后也会出现类似的损害。然而,目前仍不清楚哪些患者最有可能出现长期脑健康后果,以及这些不良事件在非 COVID 危重症和 COVID-19 之间是否存在差异:在一项前瞻性观察研究中,我们招募了 2020 年 3 月至 2021 年 6 月期间因(1)非 COVID 危重症(肺炎、心肌梗死或需要入住 ICU 的情况)或(2)COVID-19 而住院的患者。脑健康状况在 18 个月的随访中通过认知、精神和神经测试进行评估。我们使用逻辑回归和预测模型来检验不同变量与脑健康之间的关联:我们纳入了 245 名患者:结果:我们纳入了 245 名患者:125 名因非 COVID 重症住院,120 名因 COVID-19 住院[平均年龄 61.2 (± 13.6) 岁,42% 为女性]。在 18 个月的随访中,76% 的患者(72% 危重症患者,81% COVID-19 患者;P = 0.14)脑健康受损。与脑健康受损相关的最强预测因素是教育程度:危重症患者和 COVID-19 患者住院后大脑健康受损程度相当。年龄越大、教育程度越低和神经质等因素可能有助于识别易受伤害的个体,无论其潜在的疾病病因是什么,他们都可以从密切监测中获益,从而改善危重病后的脑健康状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neurology
Journal of Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
5.00%
发文量
558
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal which provides a source for publishing original communications and reviews on clinical neurology covering the whole field. In addition, Letters to the Editors serve as a forum for clinical cases and the exchange of ideas which highlight important new findings. A section on Neurological progress serves to summarise the major findings in certain fields of neurology. Commentaries on new developments in clinical neuroscience, which may be commissioned or submitted, are published as editorials. Every neurologist interested in the current diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders needs access to the information contained in this valuable journal.
期刊最新文献
Antiplatelet therapy is not associated with increased risk of complications after lumbar puncture. Brain MRI volumetry and atrophy rating scales as predictors of amyloid status and eligibility for anti-amyloid treatment in a real-world memory clinic setting. CSF synaptic biomarkers and cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy in acute stroke patients on direct oral anticoagulants. Subtypes of cognitive impairment in cerebellar disease identified by cross-diagnostic cluster-analysis: results from a German multicenter study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1