Comparing the lung isolation efficacy of bronchial blocker positioning via electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy versus fiberoptic bronchoscopy: a randomized study.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Journal of thoracic disease Pub Date : 2024-11-30 Epub Date: 2024-11-29 DOI:10.21037/jtd-24-1516
Jiayun Li, Wu Liu, Xi Liang, Ren Zhou, Mingsong Wang, Beibei Hu, Hong Jiang, Rong Hu
{"title":"Comparing the lung isolation efficacy of bronchial blocker positioning via electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy versus fiberoptic bronchoscopy: a randomized study.","authors":"Jiayun Li, Wu Liu, Xi Liang, Ren Zhou, Mingsong Wang, Beibei Hu, Hong Jiang, Rong Hu","doi":"10.21037/jtd-24-1516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The inflated balloon of a bronchial blocker (BB) obstructs the mainstem bronchus, allowing controlled ventilation of one lung while collapsing the other for lung isolation during thoracic surgery. We compared the effects of lung isolation using electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB)-guided versus fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB)-guided BB placement to provide a novel BB positioning method for airway management during thoracic anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We randomly divided 106 patients who underwent elective one-lung ventilation (OLV) with intraoperative ENB usage into ENB and FOB groups. We compared subjective lung collapse scores, time required for correct BB placement, incidence of BB malposition, and frequency of intraoperative BB repositioning with FOB between the groups. Heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure were recorded before intubation of single-lumen tracheal tube, and before and after BB positioning. Blood gas levels were measured before and at 10 and 30 min after initiating OLV. Postoperative follow-up indices, including blood cell analysis, C-reactive protein levels, and pulmonary complications, were also recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The subjective lung collapse score was significantly higher in the ENB group than in the FOB group [9.08 (1.36) <i>vs.</i> 8.24 (1.93), P=0.01]. The time required for correct BB placement was significantly shorter in the ENB group than in the FOB group [13.00 (10.00, 20.25) <i>vs.</i> 49.00 (35.00, 75.00), P<0.001]. However, the incidence of BB malposition, frequency of intraoperative BB repositioning with FOB, HR, mean arterial and peak airway pressure before and after BB positioning, arterial blood gas analysis, and postoperative follow-up indices did not differ significantly between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ENB-guided BB positioning is an efficient method of lung isolation, demonstrating superior and more rapid lung collapse effects compared with conventional FOB-guided BB placement.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The trial was registered on China Clinical Trial Registry (registration No. ChiCTR2300076133).</p>","PeriodicalId":17542,"journal":{"name":"Journal of thoracic disease","volume":"16 11","pages":"7729-7738"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11635261/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of thoracic disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-24-1516","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The inflated balloon of a bronchial blocker (BB) obstructs the mainstem bronchus, allowing controlled ventilation of one lung while collapsing the other for lung isolation during thoracic surgery. We compared the effects of lung isolation using electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB)-guided versus fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB)-guided BB placement to provide a novel BB positioning method for airway management during thoracic anesthesia.

Methods: We randomly divided 106 patients who underwent elective one-lung ventilation (OLV) with intraoperative ENB usage into ENB and FOB groups. We compared subjective lung collapse scores, time required for correct BB placement, incidence of BB malposition, and frequency of intraoperative BB repositioning with FOB between the groups. Heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure were recorded before intubation of single-lumen tracheal tube, and before and after BB positioning. Blood gas levels were measured before and at 10 and 30 min after initiating OLV. Postoperative follow-up indices, including blood cell analysis, C-reactive protein levels, and pulmonary complications, were also recorded.

Results: The subjective lung collapse score was significantly higher in the ENB group than in the FOB group [9.08 (1.36) vs. 8.24 (1.93), P=0.01]. The time required for correct BB placement was significantly shorter in the ENB group than in the FOB group [13.00 (10.00, 20.25) vs. 49.00 (35.00, 75.00), P<0.001]. However, the incidence of BB malposition, frequency of intraoperative BB repositioning with FOB, HR, mean arterial and peak airway pressure before and after BB positioning, arterial blood gas analysis, and postoperative follow-up indices did not differ significantly between the two groups.

Conclusions: ENB-guided BB positioning is an efficient method of lung isolation, demonstrating superior and more rapid lung collapse effects compared with conventional FOB-guided BB placement.

Trial registration: The trial was registered on China Clinical Trial Registry (registration No. ChiCTR2300076133).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背景:支气管封堵器(BB)的充气球囊阻塞主干支气管,在胸外科手术中允许控制一侧肺的通气,同时塌陷另一侧肺以进行肺隔离。我们比较了在电磁导航支气管镜(ENB)引导下和纤维支气管镜(FOB)引导下放置支气管阻断器的肺隔离效果,为胸腔麻醉期间的气道管理提供了一种新的支气管阻断器定位方法:我们将106名接受择期单肺通气(OLV)且术中使用ENB的患者随机分为ENB组和FOB组。我们比较了两组患者的主观肺塌陷评分、正确放置 BB 所需的时间、BB 错位的发生率以及术中使用 FOB 重新放置 BB 的频率。在单腔气管插管前、BB定位前后记录心率(HR)和平均动脉压。在开始 OLV 之前以及之后 10 分钟和 30 分钟测量了血气水平。还记录了术后随访指标,包括血细胞分析、C反应蛋白水平和肺部并发症:结果:ENB 组的主观肺塌陷评分明显高于 FOB 组[9.08 (1.36) vs. 8.24 (1.93),P=0.01]。ENB组正确放置BB所需的时间明显短于FOB组[13.00 (10.00, 20.25) vs. 49.00 (35.00, 75.00),P=0.01]:ENB引导下的BB定位是一种有效的肺隔离方法,与传统的FOB引导下的BB置入相比,ENB引导下的BB定位显示出更优越、更快速的肺塌陷效果:该试验已在中国临床试验注册中心注册(注册号:ChiCTR2300076133)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of thoracic disease
Journal of thoracic disease RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
254
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thoracic Disease (JTD, J Thorac Dis, pISSN: 2072-1439; eISSN: 2077-6624) was founded in Dec 2009, and indexed in PubMed in Dec 2011 and Science Citation Index SCI in Feb 2013. It is published quarterly (Dec 2009- Dec 2011), bimonthly (Jan 2012 - Dec 2013), monthly (Jan. 2014-) and openly distributed worldwide. JTD received its impact factor of 2.365 for the year 2016. JTD publishes manuscripts that describe new findings and provide current, practical information on the diagnosis and treatment of conditions related to thoracic disease. All the submission and reviewing are conducted electronically so that rapid review is assured.
期刊最新文献
How can osteosynthesis material used for fracture fixation undergo intrathoracic migration?-a systematic literature review. Identification of prognostic factors of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis: a retrospective cohort of 106 patients. Safety and efficacy of percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy in the treatment of acute medium- or high-risk pulmonary embolism: a single-center retrospective cross-sectional study. Impact of high spinal anesthesia in pediatric congenital heart surgery on postoperative recovery: a retrospective propensity score-matched study. Impact of lymph node evaluation standard in patients undergoing lung resection for clinical stage IA pulmonary adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1