Immunotherapy beyond progression following first‑line chemotherapy plus immunotherapy in advanced non‑small cell lung cancer: A retrospective study.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Oncology Letters Pub Date : 2024-12-05 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.3892/ol.2024.14836
Xinyue Gu, Yue Hu, Ishanee Devi Mungur, Feifei Gu, Ying Xiong, Jin Cui, Luhui Zhong, Kai Zhang, Li Liu
{"title":"Immunotherapy beyond progression following first‑line chemotherapy plus immunotherapy in advanced non‑small cell lung cancer: A retrospective study.","authors":"Xinyue Gu, Yue Hu, Ishanee Devi Mungur, Feifei Gu, Ying Xiong, Jin Cui, Luhui Zhong, Kai Zhang, Li Liu","doi":"10.3892/ol.2024.14836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Immunotherapy has paved the way for new treatment options for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, for patients who have progressed following first-line immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy, little is known about the benefits of the continuation of immunotherapy. Thus, the current study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of immunotherapy beyond progression (IBP) in patients with advanced NSCLC. A retrospective review of patients with advanced NSCLC who experienced disease progression after receiving a combination of ICIs and chemotherapy was conducted. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) times, and log-rank tests were employed to compare inter-group differences. Cox regression analyses were performed to identify independent factors associated with OS and PFS. In total, 136 patients who had disease progression after prior immunotherapy were included. A comparison of patients who were treated with ICIs after disease progression (IBP group) and those who received other treatments (non-IBP group) demonstrated a higher disease control rate after second-line treatment for the IBP group (89.8 vs. 70.8%, respectively; P=0.005). Kaplan-Meier curve analysis showed statistical differences in PFS2 (interval from the second-line treatment to progression or death for any reason; P=0.012) and OS (P=0.041). Subgroup analyses indicated superior clinical outcomes for the IBP group. Multivariate analyses revealed IBP to be an independent factor associated with improved PFS2 (hazard ratio, 0.613; 95% confidence interval, 0.403-0.933; P=0.022). In conclusion, favorable clinical outcomes for IBP were observed, and IBP remains a viable choice for patients with advanced NSCLC.</p>","PeriodicalId":19503,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Letters","volume":"29 2","pages":"90"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11638921/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2024.14836","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Immunotherapy has paved the way for new treatment options for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, for patients who have progressed following first-line immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy, little is known about the benefits of the continuation of immunotherapy. Thus, the current study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of immunotherapy beyond progression (IBP) in patients with advanced NSCLC. A retrospective review of patients with advanced NSCLC who experienced disease progression after receiving a combination of ICIs and chemotherapy was conducted. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) times, and log-rank tests were employed to compare inter-group differences. Cox regression analyses were performed to identify independent factors associated with OS and PFS. In total, 136 patients who had disease progression after prior immunotherapy were included. A comparison of patients who were treated with ICIs after disease progression (IBP group) and those who received other treatments (non-IBP group) demonstrated a higher disease control rate after second-line treatment for the IBP group (89.8 vs. 70.8%, respectively; P=0.005). Kaplan-Meier curve analysis showed statistical differences in PFS2 (interval from the second-line treatment to progression or death for any reason; P=0.012) and OS (P=0.041). Subgroup analyses indicated superior clinical outcomes for the IBP group. Multivariate analyses revealed IBP to be an independent factor associated with improved PFS2 (hazard ratio, 0.613; 95% confidence interval, 0.403-0.933; P=0.022). In conclusion, favorable clinical outcomes for IBP were observed, and IBP remains a viable choice for patients with advanced NSCLC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
晚期非小细胞肺癌一线化疗加免疫治疗后进展期的免疫治疗:回顾性研究。
免疫疗法为晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的新治疗方案铺平了道路。然而,对于一线免疫疗法联合化疗后病情进展的患者来说,继续接受免疫疗法的益处却鲜为人知。因此,本研究旨在评估晚期NSCLC患者接受进展期免疫疗法(IBP)的疗效。本研究对接受 ICIs 和化疗联合治疗后出现疾病进展的晚期 NSCLC 患者进行了回顾性研究。采用卡普兰-米尔生存分析法估算无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS),并用对数秩检验比较组间差异。为确定与 OS 和 PFS 相关的独立因素,还进行了 Cox 回归分析。共纳入了136名既往接受过免疫疗法后疾病进展的患者。对疾病进展后接受 ICIs 治疗的患者(IBP 组)和接受其他治疗的患者(非 IBP 组)进行比较后发现,IBP 组患者二线治疗后的疾病控制率更高(分别为 89.8% 对 70.8%;P=0.005)。卡普兰-梅耶曲线分析显示,PFS2(从二线治疗到病情恶化或因任何原因死亡的时间间隔;P=0.012)和OS(P=0.041)存在统计学差异。亚组分析表明,IBP 组的临床疗效更佳。多变量分析显示,IBP 是改善 PFS2 的独立相关因素(危险比为 0.613;95% 置信区间为 0.403-0.933;P=0.022)。总之,观察到IBP具有良好的临床效果,IBP仍然是晚期NSCLC患者的可行选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Oncology Letters
Oncology Letters ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
412
审稿时长
2.0 months
期刊介绍: Oncology Letters is a monthly, peer-reviewed journal, available in print and online, that focuses on all aspects of clinical oncology, as well as in vitro and in vivo experimental model systems relevant to the mechanisms of disease. The principal aim of Oncology Letters is to provide the prompt publication of original studies of high quality that pertain to clinical oncology, chemotherapy, oncogenes, carcinogenesis, metastasis, epidemiology and viral oncology in the form of original research, reviews and case reports.
期刊最新文献
Immunotherapy beyond progression following first‑line chemotherapy plus immunotherapy in advanced non‑small cell lung cancer: A retrospective study. Molecular characteristics, clinical significance and cancer‑immune interactions of pyroptosis‑related genes in colorectal cancer. The role of IL‑17, IFN‑γ, 4‑1BBL and tumour‑infiltrating lymphocytes in the occurrence, development and prognosis of pancreatic cancer. Network pharmacology and molecular docking reveal the mechanism of action of Bergapten against non‑small cell lung cancer. A novel algorithm for the detection of microsatellite instability in endometrial cancer using next‑generation sequencing data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1