Prevalence of interocular symmetry in corneal astigmatism and the possible influence of age, sex and refractive error.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1111/opo.13433
Raquel Salvador-Roger, Vicente Micó, José J Esteve-Taboada
{"title":"Prevalence of interocular symmetry in corneal astigmatism and the possible influence of age, sex and refractive error.","authors":"Raquel Salvador-Roger, Vicente Micó, José J Esteve-Taboada","doi":"10.1111/opo.13433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate, using a power vector approach, whether corneal astigmatism follows a mirror symmetry pattern considering both the magnitude and axis, and whether age, sex and spherical equivalent refractive error can influence the pattern.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The IOLMaster 700 optical biometer was used to measure the radii of curvature of the anterior corneal surface. Refractive error was determined by non-cycloplegic subjective refraction. Descriptive statistical analyses and inferential logistic regression were applied over the dichotomous variable of mirror symmetry using J<sub>0</sub> and J<sub>45</sub> power vector components. An evaluation was carried out based on the subject's age, sex and spherical equivalent refractive error.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2974 Caucasian adults were evaluated. This cross-sectional study revealed that axis orientation follows the isorule symmetry pattern, and in terms of both magnitude and axis orientation, mirror symmetry was present in 70.9% of cases. Age, sex and spherical equivalent refractive error were not significant factors and did not contribute to the clinical improvement of the model despite its statistical significance (refractive error, p = 0.001; age and sex, p = 0.23 and 0.36, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among an adult Caucasian population, the prevalence of corneal astigmatism mirror symmetry was 70.9% and isorule symmetry was the most common pattern considering axis orientation only. The inclusion of age, sex and spherical equivalent refractive error did not improve the model.</p>","PeriodicalId":19522,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.13433","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate, using a power vector approach, whether corneal astigmatism follows a mirror symmetry pattern considering both the magnitude and axis, and whether age, sex and spherical equivalent refractive error can influence the pattern.

Methods: The IOLMaster 700 optical biometer was used to measure the radii of curvature of the anterior corneal surface. Refractive error was determined by non-cycloplegic subjective refraction. Descriptive statistical analyses and inferential logistic regression were applied over the dichotomous variable of mirror symmetry using J0 and J45 power vector components. An evaluation was carried out based on the subject's age, sex and spherical equivalent refractive error.

Results: A total of 2974 Caucasian adults were evaluated. This cross-sectional study revealed that axis orientation follows the isorule symmetry pattern, and in terms of both magnitude and axis orientation, mirror symmetry was present in 70.9% of cases. Age, sex and spherical equivalent refractive error were not significant factors and did not contribute to the clinical improvement of the model despite its statistical significance (refractive error, p = 0.001; age and sex, p = 0.23 and 0.36, respectively).

Conclusions: Among an adult Caucasian population, the prevalence of corneal astigmatism mirror symmetry was 70.9% and isorule symmetry was the most common pattern considering axis orientation only. The inclusion of age, sex and spherical equivalent refractive error did not improve the model.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
角膜散光中眼球间对称性的普遍性以及年龄、性别和屈光不正的可能影响。
目的:本研究的目的是利用功率矢量法研究角膜散光是否遵循镜面对称模式,同时考虑到大小和轴,以及年龄、性别和球面等效屈光不正是否会影响这种模式。方法:采用IOLMaster 700光学生物计测量角膜前表面曲率半径。屈光不正由非睫状体麻痹的主观屈光测定。采用J0和J45功率向量分量对镜像对称二分变量进行描述性统计分析和推理逻辑回归。根据受试者的年龄、性别和球面等效屈光不正进行评估。结果:共对2974名白种人成人进行了评估。横断面研究显示,轴向遵循等规则对称模式,在大小和轴向方面,70.9%的病例存在镜像对称。年龄、性别和球面等效屈光不正均不是影响模型临床改善的显著因素,尽管存在统计学意义(屈光不正,p = 0.001;年龄和性别,p分别= 0.23和0.36)。结论:在成年高加索人群中,镜像对称的角膜散光患病率为70.9%,仅考虑轴向的等距对称是最常见的模式。年龄、性别和球面等效屈光不正的加入并没有改善模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
13.80%
发文量
135
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics, first published in 1925, is a leading international interdisciplinary journal that addresses basic and applied questions pertinent to contemporary research in vision science and optometry. OPO publishes original research papers, technical notes, reviews and letters and will interest researchers, educators and clinicians concerned with the development, use and restoration of vision.
期刊最新文献
Authors' reply: Cross-population validation of the PreMO risk indicator for predicting myopia onset in children. Quantifying tear exchange during rigid contact lens wear using corneoscleral profilometry: A proof of concept study. Repeatability of lipid layer thickness using LipiView® following removal of contact lenses and its relationship to comfort. The repeatability of macular and peripapillary vessel density in participants with different severities of glaucoma. Refractive error maps: A predictive tool for refractive error progression.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1