Tyler M Cook, Kelly N Z Fuller, Darleen A Sandoval
{"title":"Insights into the neurobiology of weight loss after bariatric surgery and GLP-1R agonists.","authors":"Tyler M Cook, Kelly N Z Fuller, Darleen A Sandoval","doi":"10.1016/j.neuropharm.2024.110269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Obesity and its related complications are growing in prevalence worldwide, with increasing impact to individuals and healthcare systems alike. Currently, the leading treatment approaches for effective and sustained weight loss are bariatric surgery and gut peptide therapeutics. At a high level, both treatment strategies work by hijacking gut-brain axis signaling to reduce food intake. However, we predict that each modality has distinct neuronal mechanisms that are responsible for their success and complications. This review compares the neurobiology of feeding behavior between these two weight loss strategies via a discussion of both clinical and pre-clinical data. The most compelling evidence points to signaling within the hindbrain, hypothalamus, and reward circuits contributing to weight loss. Considerations for treatment, including differing complications between the two treatment approaches, will also be discussed. Based on the data, we pose the hypothesis that these two interventions are acting via distinct mechanisms to induce weight loss. Both interventions have variable degrees of weight loss across the patient population, thus, understanding these distinct mechanisms could help drive individualized medicine to optimize weight loss. This article is part of the Special Issue on \"Food intake and feeding states\".</p>","PeriodicalId":19139,"journal":{"name":"Neuropharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"110269"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2024.110269","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Obesity and its related complications are growing in prevalence worldwide, with increasing impact to individuals and healthcare systems alike. Currently, the leading treatment approaches for effective and sustained weight loss are bariatric surgery and gut peptide therapeutics. At a high level, both treatment strategies work by hijacking gut-brain axis signaling to reduce food intake. However, we predict that each modality has distinct neuronal mechanisms that are responsible for their success and complications. This review compares the neurobiology of feeding behavior between these two weight loss strategies via a discussion of both clinical and pre-clinical data. The most compelling evidence points to signaling within the hindbrain, hypothalamus, and reward circuits contributing to weight loss. Considerations for treatment, including differing complications between the two treatment approaches, will also be discussed. Based on the data, we pose the hypothesis that these two interventions are acting via distinct mechanisms to induce weight loss. Both interventions have variable degrees of weight loss across the patient population, thus, understanding these distinct mechanisms could help drive individualized medicine to optimize weight loss. This article is part of the Special Issue on "Food intake and feeding states".
期刊介绍:
Neuropharmacology publishes high quality, original research and review articles within the discipline of neuroscience, especially articles with a neuropharmacological component. However, papers within any area of neuroscience will be considered. The journal does not usually accept clinical research, although preclinical neuropharmacological studies in humans may be considered. The journal only considers submissions in which the chemical structures and compositions of experimental agents are readily available in the literature or disclosed by the authors in the submitted manuscript. Only in exceptional circumstances will natural products be considered, and then only if the preparation is well defined by scientific means. Neuropharmacology publishes articles of any length (original research and reviews).