The effectiveness of alternative vessel grafts for meso-rex bypass in the treatment of extrahepatic portal vein obstruction in children.

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS Pediatric Surgery International Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1007/s00383-024-05930-7
Niramol Tantemsapya, Mongkol Laohapensang
{"title":"The effectiveness of alternative vessel grafts for meso-rex bypass in the treatment of extrahepatic portal vein obstruction in children.","authors":"Niramol Tantemsapya, Mongkol Laohapensang","doi":"10.1007/s00383-024-05930-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of alternative autologous vessel grafts in creating a Meso-Rex bypass (MRB) compared to the distal splenorenal shunt (DSRS) in resolving symptoms of portal hypertension in children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All children with EHPVO evaluated for surgery at Siriraj Hospital from January 2011 to December 2023 were reviewed. Alternative autologous vessel grafts were used in all cases where MRB was feasible. DSRS was performed in patients for whom MRB was not possible. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight children underwent successful MRB with alternative autologous vessel grafts, while six required DSRS. Children in the modified MRB group were significantly younger, with upper gastrointestinal bleeding the most common presenting symptom. In contrast, children in the DSRS group had significantly lower preoperative ammonia levels and platelet counts, with hypersplenism being the most common presenting symptom. All patients experienced complete relief of variceal bleeding and hypersplenism post-surgery. Complicated shunt thrombosis occurred after MRB using the gastric coronary vein graft. A significant decrease in ammonia levels was observed after MRB, whereas levels increased after DSRS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Alternative autologous vessel grafts are effective for constructing the MRB to resolve portal hypertension compared to DSRS.</p>","PeriodicalId":19832,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Surgery International","volume":"41 1","pages":"30"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Surgery International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-024-05930-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of alternative autologous vessel grafts in creating a Meso-Rex bypass (MRB) compared to the distal splenorenal shunt (DSRS) in resolving symptoms of portal hypertension in children.

Methods: All children with EHPVO evaluated for surgery at Siriraj Hospital from January 2011 to December 2023 were reviewed. Alternative autologous vessel grafts were used in all cases where MRB was feasible. DSRS was performed in patients for whom MRB was not possible. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared between the two groups.

Results: Eight children underwent successful MRB with alternative autologous vessel grafts, while six required DSRS. Children in the modified MRB group were significantly younger, with upper gastrointestinal bleeding the most common presenting symptom. In contrast, children in the DSRS group had significantly lower preoperative ammonia levels and platelet counts, with hypersplenism being the most common presenting symptom. All patients experienced complete relief of variceal bleeding and hypersplenism post-surgery. Complicated shunt thrombosis occurred after MRB using the gastric coronary vein graft. A significant decrease in ammonia levels was observed after MRB, whereas levels increased after DSRS.

Conclusion: Alternative autologous vessel grafts are effective for constructing the MRB to resolve portal hypertension compared to DSRS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
治疗儿童肝外门静脉阻塞的中肾旁路替代血管移植物的有效性。
目的:本研究旨在评估替代自体血管移植物创建Meso-Rex旁路(MRB)与远端脾肾分流(DSRS)在解决儿童门静脉高压症状方面的有效性。方法:回顾2011年1月至2023年12月在Siriraj医院评估手术的所有EHPVO患儿。在MRB可行的所有病例中,均采用替代自体血管移植物。对无法进行MRB的患者进行DSRS。比较两组患者的基线特征和结果。结果:8名儿童成功行MRB和其他自体血管移植,而6名儿童需要DSRS。改良MRB组的儿童明显更年轻,上消化道出血是最常见的症状。相比之下,DSRS组的儿童术前氨水平和血小板计数明显降低,脾功能亢进是最常见的症状。所有患者术后静脉曲张出血和脾功能亢进完全缓解。胃冠状静脉MRB术后并发分流血栓形成。MRB后氨水平显著降低,而DSRS后氨水平升高。结论:与DSRS相比,自体血管移植可有效构建MRB解决门静脉高压症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
215
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Surgery International is a journal devoted to the publication of new and important information from the entire spectrum of pediatric surgery. The major purpose of the journal is to promote postgraduate training and further education in the surgery of infants and children. The contents will include articles in clinical and experimental surgery, as well as related fields. One section of each issue is devoted to a special topic, with invited contributions from recognized authorities. Other sections will include: -Review articles- Original articles- Technical innovations- Letters to the editor
期刊最新文献
Correction: Antenatal detection of pediatric surgical congenital abnormalities and its effect on maternal anxiety: a multicentre prospective study in a middle‑income country. How low should we go? Outcomes of ECMO in neonates with low gestational age or birth weight. The efficacy analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic ipsilateral uretero-ureterostomy for upper urinary tract duplications in pediatric population. Day-case gastrostomy insertion in children: an achievable reality. Staged thoracoscopic internal traction approach for early repair of long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) with distal tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1