Effects of Allostatic Load on Long-Term Survival After Stroke.

IF 7.8 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Stroke Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.046622
Nicole Betty Johnson, Erica M Jones, Bruce Ovbiagele, Daniela Markovic, Amytis Towfighi
{"title":"Effects of Allostatic Load on Long-Term Survival After Stroke.","authors":"Nicole Betty Johnson, Erica M Jones, Bruce Ovbiagele, Daniela Markovic, Amytis Towfighi","doi":"10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.046622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Allostatic load index (ALI) is often utilized to quantify the physiological response to stress. This study assesses the relationship between ALI and its impact on all-cause, cardiovascular, and stroke mortality in individuals with a self-reported history of stroke and within the general National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey sampled population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey (III, 1988-1994) and the 2015 Linked Mortality File, we selected adults aged ≥25 years with self-reported stroke. We computed the weighted prevalence of each ALI category to obtain nationally representative estimates with higher ALI corresponding to a higher stress burden. We evaluated the relationship between ALI category and mortality outcomes using the Cox proportional hazard model, considering the survey design variables and adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, marital status, income, drinking, and smoking status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 17 284 people screened in the National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey sample population, 15 567 individuals were included in the study. The ALI distribution was 48.3% ALI ≤1, 21.7% ALI=2, and 30% ALI ≥3. Of 414 individuals with a reported history of stroke, there were 11.8% ALI ≤1, 22.1% ALI=2, and 66.1% ALI ≥3. There was an association between a higher ALI and older age, Black and Mexican American race, and >1 comorbidity in the overall sampled population. In the population with prior stroke, those with ALI ≥3 had 2.7× higher adjusted all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 2.7 [CI, 1.5-4.9]) and 4.5× higher adjusted cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio, 4.5 [CI, 1.4-14.3]) compared with those with ALI ≤1. In the general sampled National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey population, the ALI ≥3 group had 1.8× higher adjusted stroke mortality (hazard ratio, 1.8 [CI, 1.1-3.1]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Baseline higher ALI is associated with greater all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in stroke survivors and greater stroke mortality in the overall sampled National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey population.</p>","PeriodicalId":21989,"journal":{"name":"Stroke","volume":" ","pages":"87-94"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.046622","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Allostatic load index (ALI) is often utilized to quantify the physiological response to stress. This study assesses the relationship between ALI and its impact on all-cause, cardiovascular, and stroke mortality in individuals with a self-reported history of stroke and within the general National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey sampled population.

Methods: Using data from the National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey (III, 1988-1994) and the 2015 Linked Mortality File, we selected adults aged ≥25 years with self-reported stroke. We computed the weighted prevalence of each ALI category to obtain nationally representative estimates with higher ALI corresponding to a higher stress burden. We evaluated the relationship between ALI category and mortality outcomes using the Cox proportional hazard model, considering the survey design variables and adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, marital status, income, drinking, and smoking status.

Results: Of 17 284 people screened in the National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey sample population, 15 567 individuals were included in the study. The ALI distribution was 48.3% ALI ≤1, 21.7% ALI=2, and 30% ALI ≥3. Of 414 individuals with a reported history of stroke, there were 11.8% ALI ≤1, 22.1% ALI=2, and 66.1% ALI ≥3. There was an association between a higher ALI and older age, Black and Mexican American race, and >1 comorbidity in the overall sampled population. In the population with prior stroke, those with ALI ≥3 had 2.7× higher adjusted all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 2.7 [CI, 1.5-4.9]) and 4.5× higher adjusted cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio, 4.5 [CI, 1.4-14.3]) compared with those with ALI ≤1. In the general sampled National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey population, the ALI ≥3 group had 1.8× higher adjusted stroke mortality (hazard ratio, 1.8 [CI, 1.1-3.1]).

Conclusions: Baseline higher ALI is associated with greater all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in stroke survivors and greater stroke mortality in the overall sampled National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
适应负荷对脑卒中后长期生存的影响。
背景:适应负荷指数(Allostatic load index, ALI)常被用来量化对应激的生理反应。本研究评估了ALI及其对自述卒中史的个体和全国健康和营养调查抽样人群中全因死亡率、心血管死亡率和卒中死亡率的影响之间的关系。方法:使用1988-1994年国家健康与营养调查III期和2015年相关死亡率档案的数据,我们选择年龄≥25岁的自述卒中的成年人。我们计算了每个ALI类别的加权患病率,以获得具有全国代表性的估计值,较高的ALI对应较高的压力负担。我们使用Cox比例风险模型评估ALI类别与死亡率结果之间的关系,考虑调查设计变量并调整年龄、性别、种族/民族、教育、婚姻状况、收入、饮酒和吸烟状况。结果:在全国健康与营养调查抽样人群中筛选的17284人中,有15567人被纳入研究。ALI分布为48.3% ALI≤1,21.7% ALI=2, 30% ALI≥3。在414例有卒中史的患者中,11.8%的患者ALI≤1,22.1%的患者ALI=2, 66.1%的患者ALI≥3。在整个抽样人群中,较高的ALI与年龄、黑人和墨西哥裔美国人种族以及bbb1合并症之间存在关联。在既往卒中人群中,ALI≥3的校正全因死亡率比ALI≤1的患者高2.7倍(风险比,2.7 [CI, 1.5-4.9]),校正心血管死亡率比ALI≤1的患者高4.5倍(风险比,4.5 [CI, 1.4-14.3])。在全国健康和营养检查调查的一般抽样人群中,ALI≥3组校正脑卒中死亡率高1.8倍(危险比,1.8 [CI, 1.1-3.1])。结论:基线较高的ALI与卒中幸存者中较高的全因死亡率和心血管死亡率以及全国健康和营养调查人群中较高的卒中死亡率相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Stroke
Stroke 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
6.00%
发文量
2021
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Stroke is a monthly publication that collates reports of clinical and basic investigation of any aspect of the cerebral circulation and its diseases. The publication covers a wide range of disciplines including anesthesiology, critical care medicine, epidemiology, internal medicine, neurology, neuro-ophthalmology, neuropathology, neuropsychology, neurosurgery, nuclear medicine, nursing, radiology, rehabilitation, speech pathology, vascular physiology, and vascular surgery. The audience of Stroke includes neurologists, basic scientists, cardiologists, vascular surgeons, internists, interventionalists, neurosurgeons, nurses, and physiatrists. Stroke is indexed in Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAB Abstracts, Chemical Abstracts, CINAHL, Current Contents, Embase, MEDLINE, and Science Citation Index Expanded.
期刊最新文献
Bridging the Gap: Training and Infrastructure Solutions for Mechanical Thrombectomy in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Requiring an Interpreter Influences Stroke Care and Outcomes for People With Aphasia During Inpatient Rehabilitation. Flipping the Script: Early Neurological Gains May Redefine Recovery Prognostication After Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Subacute Neurological Improvement Predicts Favorable Functional Recovery After Intracerebral Hemorrhage: INTERACT2 Study. Strategies to Advance Stroke Care in Women: An International Conversation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1