Peak Inspiratory Flow Rate as a Prerequisite for Prescription of Inhaler Devices: A Cross-sectional Study.

Spandan Biswas, Jai Kishan Karahyla, Sameer Singhal, Tushar Nehra, Ajit Yadav
{"title":"Peak Inspiratory Flow Rate as a Prerequisite for Prescription of Inhaler Devices: A Cross-sectional Study.","authors":"Spandan Biswas, Jai Kishan Karahyla, Sameer Singhal, Tushar Nehra, Ajit Yadav","doi":"10.59556/japi.72.0741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Inhaler therapy has become the mainstay of treatment in obstructive airway diseases. Although patients, and to a certain extent doctors also, were not initially comfortable with inhalation devices, they have now become the standard of care in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma. However, the choice of inhaler device prescribed in different subsets of patients is still not clear. Prescription of a device depends upon age, dexterity, hand-mouth coordination, and peak inspiratory flow rates (PIFR). Prescription of wrong inhaler and wrong technique is not uncommon. In our study, 52.6% cases had prescription of wrong inhaler device, as per their PIFR. Physicians often do not consider the PIFR and the respiratory effort of the patient, while advising inhaler device. Only 43% patients with asthma had an adequate asthma control [asthma control test (ACT) > 19]. One of the main causes of a general inability to use an inhaler device properly results from the generation of an inadequate PIFR. It is more pronounced in those using dry powder inhalers (DPI), as it requires a higher effort-dependent inspiratory flow rate. PIFR of patients was divided into four groups, ≤30, 31-60, 61-90, and >90 L/minute. The required PIFR was taken as 30-60 L/minute for metered dose inhaler (MDI) and >60 L/minute for DPI. A positive correlation was noted for PIFR and advice to change the device as per the readings (p = 0.05). A positive correlation was also noted with PIFR compared to smoking/biomass use (p = 0.002). Thus, clinicians should advise inhalers as per PIFR and also continue to monitor PIFR on subsequent visits.</p>","PeriodicalId":22693,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India","volume":"72 12","pages":"27-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59556/japi.72.0741","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inhaler therapy has become the mainstay of treatment in obstructive airway diseases. Although patients, and to a certain extent doctors also, were not initially comfortable with inhalation devices, they have now become the standard of care in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma. However, the choice of inhaler device prescribed in different subsets of patients is still not clear. Prescription of a device depends upon age, dexterity, hand-mouth coordination, and peak inspiratory flow rates (PIFR). Prescription of wrong inhaler and wrong technique is not uncommon. In our study, 52.6% cases had prescription of wrong inhaler device, as per their PIFR. Physicians often do not consider the PIFR and the respiratory effort of the patient, while advising inhaler device. Only 43% patients with asthma had an adequate asthma control [asthma control test (ACT) > 19]. One of the main causes of a general inability to use an inhaler device properly results from the generation of an inadequate PIFR. It is more pronounced in those using dry powder inhalers (DPI), as it requires a higher effort-dependent inspiratory flow rate. PIFR of patients was divided into four groups, ≤30, 31-60, 61-90, and >90 L/minute. The required PIFR was taken as 30-60 L/minute for metered dose inhaler (MDI) and >60 L/minute for DPI. A positive correlation was noted for PIFR and advice to change the device as per the readings (p = 0.05). A positive correlation was also noted with PIFR compared to smoking/biomass use (p = 0.002). Thus, clinicians should advise inhalers as per PIFR and also continue to monitor PIFR on subsequent visits.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
峰值吸入流量是处方吸入器装置的先决条件:一项横断面研究。
吸入器疗法已成为治疗阻塞性气道疾病的主要方法。虽然患者,在某种程度上医生,最初对吸入装置并不满意,但它们现在已经成为慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)和哮喘的标准治疗方法。然而,不同亚群患者的吸入器装置的选择仍然不清楚。设备的处方取决于年龄、灵巧度、手口协调性和峰值吸气流速(PIFR)。处方错误的吸入器和错误的技术并不少见。在我们的研究中,52.6%的病例在PIFR中使用了错误的吸入器。在建议使用吸入器时,医生通常不考虑PIFR和患者的呼吸力。只有43%的哮喘患者有适当的哮喘控制[哮喘控制试验(asthma control test, ACT) bbbb19]。一般不能正确使用吸入器装置的主要原因之一是产生不充分的PIFR。在使用干粉吸入器(DPI)的患者中更为明显,因为它需要更高的努力依赖的吸气流量。PIFR分为≤30l /min、31- 60l /min、61- 90l /min和bb0 - 90l /min四组。计量吸入器(MDI)所需的PIFR为30-60 L/分钟,DPI所需的PIFR为60 L/分钟。PIFR与建议根据读数更换设备呈正相关(p = 0.05)。与吸烟/生物质利用相比,PIFR也存在正相关(p = 0.002)。因此,临床医生应根据PIFR建议吸入器,并在后续就诊时继续监测PIFR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
509
期刊最新文献
MASLD-A Gateway for ASCVD: A Call for Early Intervention and Multidisciplinary Care. Lyme Disease: An Emerging Threat. Serum Calcium Levels as a Marker of Dengue Severity: A Clinical Observational Study. Quantification of Liver Stiffness Using Magnetic Resonance Elastography in Comparison with Transient Elastography and Noninvasive Fibrosis Score in Fatty Liver. The Interplay of Age, Obesity Measures, and Micronutrient Deficiencies in PCOS-associated Metabolic Dysfunction Findings from a Retrospective Postobservational Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1