Donor-Specific Antibodies Targeting a Repeated Eplet Mismatch and Outcome After Kidney Retransplantation.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Transplant International Pub Date : 2024-11-29 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/ti.2024.13639
Caroline Arches, Cédric Usureau, Dany Anglicheau, Alexandre Hertig, Arwa Jalal-Eddine, Mohamad Zaidan, Jean-Luc Taupin, Renaud Snanoudj
{"title":"Donor-Specific Antibodies Targeting a Repeated Eplet Mismatch and Outcome After Kidney Retransplantation.","authors":"Caroline Arches, Cédric Usureau, Dany Anglicheau, Alexandre Hertig, Arwa Jalal-Eddine, Mohamad Zaidan, Jean-Luc Taupin, Renaud Snanoudj","doi":"10.3389/ti.2024.13639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Kidney retransplantations are associated with an increased risk of rejection and reduced graft survival compared to first transplantations, notably due to HLA sensitization. The impact of repeated eplet mismatches on retransplantation outcome has not been investigated. We retrospectively assessed the risk of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and graft loss associated with preformed DSA targeting Repeated Eplet MisMatches (DREMM) in sensitized patients undergoing kidney retransplantation. We included 45 retransplanted patients with preformed DSA against the second donor. We determined HLA incompatibilities at the eplet levels, and the eplet target of the DSA using HLAMatchmaker<sup>®</sup>. Repeated mismatches were more frequent at the eplet (87%) than at the antigenic level (22%), but were not associated with the risk of ABMR. The eplet specificity of the DSA revealed that 60% of patients (n = 27) had DREMM. The presence of DREMM was associated with a higher frequency of ABMR (70% versus 28%, <i>P</i> = 0.005) and with a lower death-censored graft survival (log-rank test, <i>P</i> = 0.01). However, in multivariate Cox model, we could not show that DREMM were associated with the risk of ABMR. In conclusion, this study suggests that identifying DREMM may be an interesting clinical tool, however further larger studies are necessary to precise their exact predictive value.</p>","PeriodicalId":23343,"journal":{"name":"Transplant International","volume":"37 ","pages":"13639"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11637850/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/ti.2024.13639","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Kidney retransplantations are associated with an increased risk of rejection and reduced graft survival compared to first transplantations, notably due to HLA sensitization. The impact of repeated eplet mismatches on retransplantation outcome has not been investigated. We retrospectively assessed the risk of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and graft loss associated with preformed DSA targeting Repeated Eplet MisMatches (DREMM) in sensitized patients undergoing kidney retransplantation. We included 45 retransplanted patients with preformed DSA against the second donor. We determined HLA incompatibilities at the eplet levels, and the eplet target of the DSA using HLAMatchmaker®. Repeated mismatches were more frequent at the eplet (87%) than at the antigenic level (22%), but were not associated with the risk of ABMR. The eplet specificity of the DSA revealed that 60% of patients (n = 27) had DREMM. The presence of DREMM was associated with a higher frequency of ABMR (70% versus 28%, P = 0.005) and with a lower death-censored graft survival (log-rank test, P = 0.01). However, in multivariate Cox model, we could not show that DREMM were associated with the risk of ABMR. In conclusion, this study suggests that identifying DREMM may be an interesting clinical tool, however further larger studies are necessary to precise their exact predictive value.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对重复Eplet错配的供体特异性抗体和肾再移植后的结果。
与首次移植相比,肾脏再移植与排斥风险增加和移植物存活率降低有关,这主要是由于 HLA 致敏所致。目前尚未研究重复肾小球不匹配对再移植结果的影响。我们回顾性地评估了接受肾脏再移植的致敏患者发生抗体介导的排斥反应(ABMR)和移植物丢失的风险,这些风险与针对重复外显子错配(DREMM)的预制 DSA 有关。我们纳入了 45 名针对第二供体预制 DSA 的再移植患者。我们使用 HLAMatchmaker® 确定了外显子水平上的 HLA 不相容性以及 DSA 的外显子目标。外显子重复不匹配率(87%)高于抗原水平(22%),但与 ABMR 风险无关。DSA 的外显子特异性显示,60% 的患者(n = 27)患有 DREMM。DREMM 的存在与较高的 ABMR 发生率(70% 对 28%,P = 0.005)和较低的死亡剪除移植物存活率(对数秩检验,P = 0.01)相关。然而,在多变量 Cox 模型中,我们无法显示 DREMM 与 ABMR 风险相关。总之,本研究表明,识别 DREMM 可能是一种有趣的临床工具,但需要进一步开展更大规模的研究,以确定其确切的预测价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transplant International
Transplant International 医学-外科
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.50%
发文量
211
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the journal is to serve as a forum for the exchange of scientific information in the form of original and high quality papers in the field of transplantation. Clinical and experimental studies, as well as editorials, letters to the editors, and, occasionally, reviews on the biology, physiology, and immunology of transplantation of tissues and organs, are published. Publishing time for the latter is approximately six months, provided major revisions are not needed. The journal is published in yearly volumes, each volume containing twelve issues. Papers submitted to the journal are subject to peer review.
期刊最新文献
Donors With Previous Malignancy: When Is It Safe to Proceed With Organ Transplantation? No Emergence of Colistin Resistance in the Respiratory Tract of Lung Transplant Patients Treated With Inhaled Colistin. A Global Survey of Self-Reported Cancer Screening Practices by Health Professionals for Kidney Transplant Candidates and Recipients. Pre-Transplant Hypoalbuminemia Is Not Associated With Early Key Outcomes Among Simultaneous Pancreas and Kidney Transplant Recipients. Potential Infectious Complications in Pig Xenograft Donors and Recipients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1