{"title":"Donor-Specific Antibodies Targeting a Repeated Eplet Mismatch and Outcome After Kidney Retransplantation.","authors":"Caroline Arches, Cédric Usureau, Dany Anglicheau, Alexandre Hertig, Arwa Jalal-Eddine, Mohamad Zaidan, Jean-Luc Taupin, Renaud Snanoudj","doi":"10.3389/ti.2024.13639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Kidney retransplantations are associated with an increased risk of rejection and reduced graft survival compared to first transplantations, notably due to HLA sensitization. The impact of repeated eplet mismatches on retransplantation outcome has not been investigated. We retrospectively assessed the risk of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and graft loss associated with preformed DSA targeting Repeated Eplet MisMatches (DREMM) in sensitized patients undergoing kidney retransplantation. We included 45 retransplanted patients with preformed DSA against the second donor. We determined HLA incompatibilities at the eplet levels, and the eplet target of the DSA using HLAMatchmaker<sup>®</sup>. Repeated mismatches were more frequent at the eplet (87%) than at the antigenic level (22%), but were not associated with the risk of ABMR. The eplet specificity of the DSA revealed that 60% of patients (n = 27) had DREMM. The presence of DREMM was associated with a higher frequency of ABMR (70% versus 28%, <i>P</i> = 0.005) and with a lower death-censored graft survival (log-rank test, <i>P</i> = 0.01). However, in multivariate Cox model, we could not show that DREMM were associated with the risk of ABMR. In conclusion, this study suggests that identifying DREMM may be an interesting clinical tool, however further larger studies are necessary to precise their exact predictive value.</p>","PeriodicalId":23343,"journal":{"name":"Transplant International","volume":"37 ","pages":"13639"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11637850/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/ti.2024.13639","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Kidney retransplantations are associated with an increased risk of rejection and reduced graft survival compared to first transplantations, notably due to HLA sensitization. The impact of repeated eplet mismatches on retransplantation outcome has not been investigated. We retrospectively assessed the risk of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and graft loss associated with preformed DSA targeting Repeated Eplet MisMatches (DREMM) in sensitized patients undergoing kidney retransplantation. We included 45 retransplanted patients with preformed DSA against the second donor. We determined HLA incompatibilities at the eplet levels, and the eplet target of the DSA using HLAMatchmaker®. Repeated mismatches were more frequent at the eplet (87%) than at the antigenic level (22%), but were not associated with the risk of ABMR. The eplet specificity of the DSA revealed that 60% of patients (n = 27) had DREMM. The presence of DREMM was associated with a higher frequency of ABMR (70% versus 28%, P = 0.005) and with a lower death-censored graft survival (log-rank test, P = 0.01). However, in multivariate Cox model, we could not show that DREMM were associated with the risk of ABMR. In conclusion, this study suggests that identifying DREMM may be an interesting clinical tool, however further larger studies are necessary to precise their exact predictive value.
期刊介绍:
The aim of the journal is to serve as a forum for the exchange of scientific information in the form of original and high quality papers in the field of transplantation. Clinical and experimental studies, as well as editorials, letters to the editors, and, occasionally, reviews on the biology, physiology, and immunology of transplantation of tissues and organs, are published. Publishing time for the latter is approximately six months, provided major revisions are not needed. The journal is published in yearly volumes, each volume containing twelve issues. Papers submitted to the journal are subject to peer review.