Barriers and Facilitators in the Use of Selected Point-of-care Diagnostics in Indian Public Health Programs.

Tintu Varghese, Dilip Abraham, Beula Subashini Panchatcharam, Gagandeep Kang
{"title":"Barriers and Facilitators in the Use of Selected Point-of-care Diagnostics in Indian Public Health Programs.","authors":"Tintu Varghese, Dilip Abraham, Beula Subashini Panchatcharam, Gagandeep Kang","doi":"10.59556/japi.72.0766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Comprehensive reviews on the use and utility of point-of-care tests (POCs) in public health programs in relation to infectious disease and nutrition are limited. Point-of-care technologies have potential to improve the management of infectious diseases particularly in settings where healthcare infrastructure and timely access to quality medical care are limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We aim to describe POC tests currently used or under evaluation in the Indian national programs for communicable diseases and nutrition, and to identify the barriers and facilitators. Scoping review methodology was followed to search databases such as MEDLINE, EPPI (evidence for policy and practice information), CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), JBI Evidence Synthesis, and Google Scholar. Descriptive statistics were applied to identify the utility, barriers, and facilitators of POCs in context of Indian public health program from patients' and physicians' perspectives.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rapid results, appropriate case management, and accuracy of testing in remote areas are perceived to be the major benefits of using POCs. Lack of awareness about POCs and lack of regulations leading to spurious products on the market are obstacles to their optimal use.</p>","PeriodicalId":22693,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India","volume":"72 12","pages":"e42-e51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59556/japi.72.0766","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Comprehensive reviews on the use and utility of point-of-care tests (POCs) in public health programs in relation to infectious disease and nutrition are limited. Point-of-care technologies have potential to improve the management of infectious diseases particularly in settings where healthcare infrastructure and timely access to quality medical care are limited.

Methods: We aim to describe POC tests currently used or under evaluation in the Indian national programs for communicable diseases and nutrition, and to identify the barriers and facilitators. Scoping review methodology was followed to search databases such as MEDLINE, EPPI (evidence for policy and practice information), CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), JBI Evidence Synthesis, and Google Scholar. Descriptive statistics were applied to identify the utility, barriers, and facilitators of POCs in context of Indian public health program from patients' and physicians' perspectives.

Conclusion: Rapid results, appropriate case management, and accuracy of testing in remote areas are perceived to be the major benefits of using POCs. Lack of awareness about POCs and lack of regulations leading to spurious products on the market are obstacles to their optimal use.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在印度公共卫生项目中使用选定的即时诊断的障碍和促进因素。
背景:在传染病和营养相关的公共卫生项目中,对即时检测(POCs)的使用和效用的综合评价是有限的。护理点技术具有改善传染病管理的潜力,特别是在保健基础设施和及时获得高质量医疗服务有限的环境中。方法:我们的目标是描述目前在印度国家传染病和营养项目中使用或正在评估的POC测试,并确定障碍和促进因素。采用范围审查方法搜索数据库,如MEDLINE、EPPI(政策和实践信息证据)、CINAHL(护理和相关健康文献累积索引)、JBI证据综合和谷歌Scholar。从患者和医生的角度,应用描述性统计来确定POCs在印度公共卫生项目背景下的效用、障碍和促进因素。结论:快速结果、适当的病例管理和偏远地区检测的准确性被认为是使用POCs的主要好处。缺乏对POCs的认识和缺乏导致市场上假冒产品的监管是其最佳利用的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
509
期刊最新文献
MASLD-A Gateway for ASCVD: A Call for Early Intervention and Multidisciplinary Care. Lyme Disease: An Emerging Threat. Serum Calcium Levels as a Marker of Dengue Severity: A Clinical Observational Study. Quantification of Liver Stiffness Using Magnetic Resonance Elastography in Comparison with Transient Elastography and Noninvasive Fibrosis Score in Fatty Liver. The Interplay of Age, Obesity Measures, and Micronutrient Deficiencies in PCOS-associated Metabolic Dysfunction Findings from a Retrospective Postobservational Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1