Choice of dialysis access: Catheter, peritoneal, or hemodialysis

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Seminars in Vascular Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2024.09.003
Andrea Lubitz , Karen Woo
{"title":"Choice of dialysis access: Catheter, peritoneal, or hemodialysis","authors":"Andrea Lubitz ,&nbsp;Karen Woo","doi":"10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2024.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The most recent National Kidney Foundation Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative guidelines shifted emphasis to kidney replacement modality selection and vascular access planning and creation of the Endstage Kidney Disease Life-Plan, which promotes a patient-centered approach. The Life-Plan is intended to be created through discussions between the patient and their multidisciplinary care team to ultimately develop a lifelong kidney replacement therapy strategy. The focus of the Life-Plan is to engage the patient in a multidisciplinary patient-centered approach. The Life-Plan includes selection of the most suitable treatment modality (eg, hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, or transplantation), setting (home or center), and type of vascular access. Ultimately, this approach considers overall patient health, preferences, and anatomic factors. Patients choose between hemodialysis, which can be performed either in center or at home, and peritoneal dialysis. When considering vascular access, options consist of tunneled dialysis catheter, arteriovenous fistula, and arteriovenous graft. Each modality and vascular access type has benefits and disadvantages that should be weighed carefully with the patient and their supportive team to arrive at a decision that aligns as closely as possible with each individual patient's circumstances.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51153,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Vascular Surgery","volume":"37 4","pages":"Pages 369-374"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895796724000589","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The most recent National Kidney Foundation Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative guidelines shifted emphasis to kidney replacement modality selection and vascular access planning and creation of the Endstage Kidney Disease Life-Plan, which promotes a patient-centered approach. The Life-Plan is intended to be created through discussions between the patient and their multidisciplinary care team to ultimately develop a lifelong kidney replacement therapy strategy. The focus of the Life-Plan is to engage the patient in a multidisciplinary patient-centered approach. The Life-Plan includes selection of the most suitable treatment modality (eg, hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, or transplantation), setting (home or center), and type of vascular access. Ultimately, this approach considers overall patient health, preferences, and anatomic factors. Patients choose between hemodialysis, which can be performed either in center or at home, and peritoneal dialysis. When considering vascular access, options consist of tunneled dialysis catheter, arteriovenous fistula, and arteriovenous graft. Each modality and vascular access type has benefits and disadvantages that should be weighed carefully with the patient and their supportive team to arrive at a decision that aligns as closely as possible with each individual patient's circumstances.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
透析途径的选择:导管、腹膜或血液透析。
最新的国家肾脏基金会肾脏疾病结果质量倡议指南将重点转移到肾脏替代方式的选择和血管通路规划以及终末期肾脏疾病生命计划的创建,这促进了以患者为中心的方法。生命计划旨在通过患者和他们的多学科护理团队之间的讨论来制定最终的终身肾脏替代治疗策略。生命计划的重点是使患者参与以患者为中心的多学科方法。生命计划包括选择最合适的治疗方式(如血液透析、腹膜透析或移植)、环境(家庭或中心)和血管通路类型。最终,这种方法考虑了患者的整体健康、偏好和解剖因素。患者可以在血液透析(可在中心或家中进行)和腹膜透析之间进行选择。当考虑血管通路时,选择包括隧道透析导管、动静脉瘘和动静脉移植物。每种方式和血管通路类型都有利弊,应与患者及其支持团队仔细权衡,以尽可能根据每个患者的具体情况做出决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Each issue of Seminars in Vascular Surgery examines the latest thinking on a particular clinical problem and features new diagnostic and operative techniques. The journal allows practitioners to expand their capabilities and to keep pace with the most rapidly evolving areas of surgery.
期刊最新文献
Introduction Choice of dialysis access: Catheter, peritoneal, or hemodialysis Effects of dialysis on peripheral arterial disease Management of dialysis access in the post-transplantation patient Management of carotid disease in the end-stage renal disease patient
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1