Effects of a 1-year piano intervention on cognitive flexibility in older adults.

IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY Psychology and Aging Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1037/pag0000871
Melanie Mack, Damien Marie, Florian Worschech, Tillmann H C Krüger, Christopher Sinke, Eckart Altenmüller, Clara E James, Matthias Kliegel
{"title":"Effects of a 1-year piano intervention on cognitive flexibility in older adults.","authors":"Melanie Mack, Damien Marie, Florian Worschech, Tillmann H C Krüger, Christopher Sinke, Eckart Altenmüller, Clara E James, Matthias Kliegel","doi":"10.1037/pag0000871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We analyzed the data of a randomized controlled trial to examine the effects of piano practice on cognitive flexibility in healthy older adults. Participants (<i>N</i> = 153, 69.5 ± 3.5 years of age, 57.5% females) were randomly assigned to a piano practice group (PP) or a control group engaged in active music listening (MC). Both groups underwent a year-long intervention with weekly 60-min lessons and daily homework. We assessed switch and mixing costs in terms of speed (mean reaction times) and variability (standard deviation of reaction times) with a number switch and a perceptual switch task. We employed scale analysis based on musical instrument digital interface to assess pianistic performance. Tests were conducted at baseline, after 6 months, postintervention (12 months), and at follow-up (18 months). Results revealed more pronounced improvements in pianistic performance in the PP group compared with the MC group over the course of the intervention. Both groups exhibited gains in several cognitive flexibility outcomes, which originated primarily in the latter half of the intervention. For mixing costs of the number switch test, the PP group showed greater improvements compared with the MC group. Changes in pianistic performance were not related to changes in cognitive flexibility. Additionally, the findings indicated a compensation account in both groups, which was more pronounced in the PP group for mixing costs. This study suggests that both piano practice and active music listening-with piano practice to a higher degree-enhance cognitive flexibility, particularly in sustained control mechanisms linked to mixing costs. Both interventions potentially require longer than 6 months to induce behavioral transfer effects and are especially beneficial for individuals with lower cognitive flexibility levels. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48426,"journal":{"name":"Psychology and Aging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology and Aging","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000871","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We analyzed the data of a randomized controlled trial to examine the effects of piano practice on cognitive flexibility in healthy older adults. Participants (N = 153, 69.5 ± 3.5 years of age, 57.5% females) were randomly assigned to a piano practice group (PP) or a control group engaged in active music listening (MC). Both groups underwent a year-long intervention with weekly 60-min lessons and daily homework. We assessed switch and mixing costs in terms of speed (mean reaction times) and variability (standard deviation of reaction times) with a number switch and a perceptual switch task. We employed scale analysis based on musical instrument digital interface to assess pianistic performance. Tests were conducted at baseline, after 6 months, postintervention (12 months), and at follow-up (18 months). Results revealed more pronounced improvements in pianistic performance in the PP group compared with the MC group over the course of the intervention. Both groups exhibited gains in several cognitive flexibility outcomes, which originated primarily in the latter half of the intervention. For mixing costs of the number switch test, the PP group showed greater improvements compared with the MC group. Changes in pianistic performance were not related to changes in cognitive flexibility. Additionally, the findings indicated a compensation account in both groups, which was more pronounced in the PP group for mixing costs. This study suggests that both piano practice and active music listening-with piano practice to a higher degree-enhance cognitive flexibility, particularly in sustained control mechanisms linked to mixing costs. Both interventions potentially require longer than 6 months to induce behavioral transfer effects and are especially beneficial for individuals with lower cognitive flexibility levels. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1年钢琴干预对老年人认知灵活性的影响。
我们分析了一项随机对照试验的数据,以检验钢琴练习对健康老年人认知灵活性的影响。研究对象(N = 153名,年龄69.5±3.5岁,女性57.5%)随机分为钢琴练习组(PP)和积极听音乐组(MC)。两组学生都接受了为期一年的干预,每周上60分钟的课,每天做作业。我们根据速度(平均反应时间)和可变性(反应时间的标准偏差)对数字切换和感知切换任务的切换和混合成本进行了评估。我们采用基于乐器数字接口的音阶分析来评估钢琴演奏。测试分别在基线、6个月后、干预后(12个月)和随访时(18个月)进行。结果显示,与MC组相比,PP组在干预过程中钢琴表现的改善更为明显。两组在几个认知灵活性结果上都表现出了进步,这主要源于干预的后半部分。对于数字转换测试的混合成本,PP组比MC组有更大的改善。钢琴演奏的变化与认知灵活性的变化无关。此外,研究结果表明,补偿帐户在两组,这是更明显的PP组混合成本。这项研究表明,钢琴练习和积极的音乐聆听——在更高程度上进行钢琴练习——都能增强认知灵活性,特别是在与混音成本相关的持续控制机制方面。这两种干预都可能需要超过6个月的时间来诱导行为转移效应,对认知灵活性水平较低的个体尤其有益。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
10.80%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: Psychology and Aging publishes original articles on adult development and aging. Such original articles include reports of research that may be applied, biobehavioral, clinical, educational, experimental (laboratory, field, or naturalistic studies), methodological, or psychosocial. Although the emphasis is on original research investigations, occasional theoretical analyses of research issues, practical clinical problems, or policy may appear, as well as critical reviews of a content area in adult development and aging. Clinical case studies that have theoretical significance are also appropriate. Brief reports are acceptable with the author"s agreement not to submit a full report to another journal.
期刊最新文献
Can goal reminders reduce the Stroop effect in older adults? Emotion regulation success in older adults with and without mild cognitive impairment. Neural biomarkers of age-related memory change. Advancing with age: Older adults excel in comprehension of novel metaphors. Age and sex differences in emotion perception are influenced by emotional category and communication channel.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1