Understanding the Needs and Experiences With Health Services of Gay and Bisexual Men (GBM) Who Engaged in Chemsex During the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Quebec, Canada.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Qualitative Health Research Pub Date : 2024-12-15 DOI:10.1177/10497323241302973
Maxi Gaudette, David Ortiz-Paredes, Adam Bourne, Yannick Gaudette, Jorge Flores-Aranda, Rod Knight, Olivier Ferlatte
{"title":"Understanding the Needs and Experiences With Health Services of Gay and Bisexual Men (GBM) Who Engaged in Chemsex During the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Quebec, Canada.","authors":"Maxi Gaudette, David Ortiz-Paredes, Adam Bourne, Yannick Gaudette, Jorge Flores-Aranda, Rod Knight, Olivier Ferlatte","doi":"10.1177/10497323241302973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gay and bisexual men (GBM) engaging in chemsex can face various health and well-being-related challenges, the extent of which remains unknown given the limited research in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. This paper examines the pandemic impacts on the health needs of GBM who engaged in chemsex and their experiences with related services. We applied interpretive description to produce knowledge with direct implications for improving practices and policies. Data were collected between July 2020 and January 2021 using in-depth semi-structured interviews with eight key informants who held chemsex expertise and 13 GBM with chemsex lived experiences. Interviews were transcribed, anonymized, and analyzed thematically, yielding three interrelated themes. First, participants argued that the COVID-19 public health response was heteronormative and moralizing, reinforcing feelings of shame among GBM who engaged in chemsex and further isolating them. This added a layer of stigma and exposed them to increased drug-related risks by obstructing harm reduction practices. Second, participants contended how the pandemic worsened the scarcity and shortcomings of chemsex-specialized services. The mandatory shift to online services made it harder to form meaningful therapeutic relationships, especially given the unique sensitivity and stigma associated with chemsex, further heightened during the pandemic. Third, this online shift simultaneously facilitated access to personalized and culturally sensitive care, especially for those with less urgent needs. Our findings' implications emphasize the importance of adopting a comprehensive approach in chemsex care, integrating both in-person and online methods, to counteract health iniquities reinforced by the pandemic and the institutional responses to it.</p>","PeriodicalId":48437,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Health Research","volume":" ","pages":"10497323241302973"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323241302973","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gay and bisexual men (GBM) engaging in chemsex can face various health and well-being-related challenges, the extent of which remains unknown given the limited research in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. This paper examines the pandemic impacts on the health needs of GBM who engaged in chemsex and their experiences with related services. We applied interpretive description to produce knowledge with direct implications for improving practices and policies. Data were collected between July 2020 and January 2021 using in-depth semi-structured interviews with eight key informants who held chemsex expertise and 13 GBM with chemsex lived experiences. Interviews were transcribed, anonymized, and analyzed thematically, yielding three interrelated themes. First, participants argued that the COVID-19 public health response was heteronormative and moralizing, reinforcing feelings of shame among GBM who engaged in chemsex and further isolating them. This added a layer of stigma and exposed them to increased drug-related risks by obstructing harm reduction practices. Second, participants contended how the pandemic worsened the scarcity and shortcomings of chemsex-specialized services. The mandatory shift to online services made it harder to form meaningful therapeutic relationships, especially given the unique sensitivity and stigma associated with chemsex, further heightened during the pandemic. Third, this online shift simultaneously facilitated access to personalized and culturally sensitive care, especially for those with less urgent needs. Our findings' implications emphasize the importance of adopting a comprehensive approach in chemsex care, integrating both in-person and online methods, to counteract health iniquities reinforced by the pandemic and the institutional responses to it.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解加拿大魁北克省 COVID-19 大流行第一年期间从事化学性行为的男同性恋者和双性恋者 (GBM) 对医疗服务的需求和体验。
从事化学性性行为的男同性恋者和双性恋者(GBM)可能会面临各种与健康和福祉相关的挑战,而在 COVID-19 大流行的背景下,由于研究有限,这些挑战的程度仍不得而知。本文探讨了大流行对从事化学性性行为的男同性恋者的健康需求的影响,以及他们在相关服务方面的经历。我们采用解释性描述的方法,以获得对改进实践和政策有直接影响的知识。我们在 2020 年 7 月至 2021 年 1 月期间通过半结构式深度访谈收集了数据,访谈对象包括 8 位具有化学性行为专业知识的关键信息提供者和 13 位具有化学性行为生活经历的大流行病学家。访谈内容经过誊写、匿名和专题分析后,产生了三个相互关联的主题。首先,参与者认为 COVID-19 的公共卫生应对措施是异性恋和道德化的,这加深了从事化学性性行为的性别母亲的羞耻感,并进一步孤立了她们。这给他们蒙上了一层污名,并通过阻碍减少伤害的做法使他们面临更多与毒品有关的风险。其次,与会者争辩说,大流行病如何加剧了药性服务的稀缺性和缺陷。强制转向在线服务使得形成有意义的治疗关系变得更加困难,特别是考虑到与药性相关的独特敏感性和耻辱感,这在大流行期间进一步加剧。第三,在线服务的转变同时促进了个性化和文化敏感性护理的获得,尤其是对于那些需求不太迫切的人。我们的研究结果的意义强调了在化性治疗中采取综合方法的重要性,将面对面和在线两种方法结合起来,以抵制因大流行病和机构应对措施而加剧的健康不公。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH is an international, interdisciplinary, refereed journal for the enhancement of health care and to further the development and understanding of qualitative research methods in health care settings. We welcome manuscripts in the following areas: the description and analysis of the illness experience, health and health-seeking behaviors, the experiences of caregivers, the sociocultural organization of health care, health care policy, and related topics. We also seek critical reviews and commentaries addressing conceptual, theoretical, methodological, and ethical issues pertaining to qualitative enquiry.
期刊最新文献
From Promise to Practice: How Health Researchers Understand and Promote Transdisciplinary Collaboration. The Changing Care of Older Adults With Bipolar Disorder: A Narrative Analysis. Age Melancholy of Older Mizrahi Women Residing in Tel Aviv as a Social Loss: Exploring Intersections of Health and Social Support in an Ethnographic Study. The Emotional Aftermath of Surviving an Attempted Intimate Partner Homicide. Understanding the Experiences and Support Needs of Close Relatives in Psychiatric Euthanasia Trajectories: A Qualitative Exploration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1