Residency Program Directors' Perspectives on Overtime Duty Hours and Professional Development Time in Japan.

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to explore the perspectives of residency program directors in Japan regarding overtime duty hours and the balance between clinical training and self-improvement activities. This study explores the impact of work-hour regulations on resident well-being and training quality, contributing to global discourse on medical education reform.

Participants and methods: A cross-sectional survey was distributed to 701 residency training hospitals across Japan to investigate their readiness for new duty-hour limits under the Medical Care Act, which categorizes working hours into Level A (960 hours/year), Level B (1440 hours/year), and Level C-1 (1920 hours/year). The survey, conducted from October 18 to December 15, 2023, achieved a 36.2% response rate (n=254). Key questions included: "Considering the balance between clinical skills development and mental well-being, what do you think is the optimal number of overtime duty hours per month for resident physicians?" Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics and Chi-square tests to compare responses across hospital types.

Results: Most directors favored a conservative overtime limit of 40 hours per month (mean ± standard deviation: 40 ± 21 h), with 24.0% expressing this preference. These findings reveal a significant evidence-practice gap, suggesting that current practices often exceed recommended limits, highlighting a need for alignment between policy and implementation.

Conclusion: This study provides insights into the complex interplay between resident training demands and well-being under Japan's new duty-hour reforms. It offers valuable insights for policymakers and educators aiming to optimize training environments and enhance resident well-being globally.