Physicians' views and knowledge on the antibiotic treatment of pneumonia in advanced dementia.

IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Israel Journal of Health Policy Research Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1186/s13584-024-00649-1
Itai Harpaz, Boris Punchik, Tamar Freud, Yan Press
{"title":"Physicians' views and knowledge on the antibiotic treatment of pneumonia in advanced dementia.","authors":"Itai Harpaz, Boris Punchik, Tamar Freud, Yan Press","doi":"10.1186/s13584-024-00649-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antibiotic treatment (AT) for patients with advanced dementia and pneumonia is a complex issue. AT can prolong life, but it can also prolong suffering for the patient and the family. In this study we evaluated physicians' attitudes to this issue.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A vignette-based survey among community-based physicians (CBP) and hospital-based physicians (HBP) who work in southern Israel. The physicians were asked to complete a questionnaire on their knowledge and attitudes to AT, based on a case description of a patient with advanced dementia and pneumonia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>211 physicians participated in the study including 134 CBP (63.5%) and 77 HBP (36.5%). 177 physicians chose the AT option for the patient presented in the case, with 59.7% of the HBP and 32.8% of the CBP choosing intravenous (IV) AT (p = 0.017). In contrast, in the same case, but with themselves as the patient, 68.8% of HBP and 32.8% of CBP chose the option of palliative care without AT, with only 14.3% of HBP and 10.4% of CBP choosing the option of hospitalization with IV AT. In two logistic regression models, physicians who chose IV AT for themselves were fourfold more likely to make a similar choice for their patients. Over 75% of the physicians were not knowledgeable about the administration of AT in accordance with the Dying Patient Act.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study indicate the need for an educational intervention among physicians to expand their knowledge and expertise on end-of-life treatment for patients with advanced dementia. In addition, we invite policy makers to convene a discussion on the possibility of changing the law to facilitate the conduct of studies of patients with advanced dementia. Such studies would make it possible to develop an evidence-based treatment strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":46694,"journal":{"name":"Israel Journal of Health Policy Research","volume":"13 1","pages":"61"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Israel Journal of Health Policy Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13584-024-00649-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Antibiotic treatment (AT) for patients with advanced dementia and pneumonia is a complex issue. AT can prolong life, but it can also prolong suffering for the patient and the family. In this study we evaluated physicians' attitudes to this issue.

Methods: A vignette-based survey among community-based physicians (CBP) and hospital-based physicians (HBP) who work in southern Israel. The physicians were asked to complete a questionnaire on their knowledge and attitudes to AT, based on a case description of a patient with advanced dementia and pneumonia.

Results: 211 physicians participated in the study including 134 CBP (63.5%) and 77 HBP (36.5%). 177 physicians chose the AT option for the patient presented in the case, with 59.7% of the HBP and 32.8% of the CBP choosing intravenous (IV) AT (p = 0.017). In contrast, in the same case, but with themselves as the patient, 68.8% of HBP and 32.8% of CBP chose the option of palliative care without AT, with only 14.3% of HBP and 10.4% of CBP choosing the option of hospitalization with IV AT. In two logistic regression models, physicians who chose IV AT for themselves were fourfold more likely to make a similar choice for their patients. Over 75% of the physicians were not knowledgeable about the administration of AT in accordance with the Dying Patient Act.

Conclusions: The results of this study indicate the need for an educational intervention among physicians to expand their knowledge and expertise on end-of-life treatment for patients with advanced dementia. In addition, we invite policy makers to convene a discussion on the possibility of changing the law to facilitate the conduct of studies of patients with advanced dementia. Such studies would make it possible to develop an evidence-based treatment strategy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医生对晚期痴呆症患者肺炎抗生素治疗的看法和知识。
背景:晚期痴呆和肺炎患者的抗生素治疗(AT)是一个复杂的问题。抗生素治疗可以延长患者的生命,但也可能延长患者和家属的痛苦。在本研究中,我们评估了医生对这一问题的态度:在以色列南部工作的社区医生(CBP)和医院医生(HBP)中开展了一项基于小故事的调查。结果:211 名医生参与了调查,其中包括 134 名 CBP(63.5%)和 77 名 HBP(36.5%)。177名医生为病例中的患者选择了AT方案,其中59.7%的HBP和32.8%的CBP选择了静脉注射(IV)AT(P = 0.017)。相比之下,在同样的病例中,如果患者是自己,68.8% 的 HBP 和 32.8% 的 CBP 选择了不使用 AT 的姑息治疗,只有 14.3% 的 HBP 和 10.4% 的 CBP 选择了使用静脉 AT 的住院治疗。在两个逻辑回归模型中,为自己选择静脉注射抗逆转录病毒疗法的医生为病人做出类似选择的可能性高出四倍。超过 75% 的医生不了解如何根据《临终病人法案》使用催产素:这项研究的结果表明,有必要对医生进行教育干预,以扩展他们对晚期痴呆症患者临终治疗的知识和专业技能。此外,我们还邀请政策制定者就修改法律以促进对晚期痴呆症患者进行研究的可能性进行讨论。此类研究将为制定循证治疗策略提供可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.40%
发文量
38
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊最新文献
Predictors of intention to stay in the profession among novice nurses: a cross-sectional study. The race to disasters - is the international relief community ready for future disasters? Physicians' views and knowledge on the antibiotic treatment of pneumonia in advanced dementia. Pediatricians at the forefront of child mental health? A Delphi method exploration. Intersecting dimensions: advanced analytical approach to school climate and injury prevention in health policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1