Preoperative inspiratory muscle training improves lung function prior to elective heart valve surgery and reduces postoperative lung function impairment and pulmonary complications: a randomised trial

IF 9.7 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Physiotherapy Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jphys.2024.12.002
Pengming Yu , Zeruxin Luo , Yuqiang Wang , Song Lin , Deyu Qin , Alice YM Jones , Jiayuan He
{"title":"Preoperative inspiratory muscle training improves lung function prior to elective heart valve surgery and reduces postoperative lung function impairment and pulmonary complications: a randomised trial","authors":"Pengming Yu ,&nbsp;Zeruxin Luo ,&nbsp;Yuqiang Wang ,&nbsp;Song Lin ,&nbsp;Deyu Qin ,&nbsp;Alice YM Jones ,&nbsp;Jiayuan He","doi":"10.1016/j.jphys.2024.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Question</h3><div>What is the effect of 3 days of preoperative inspiratory muscle training (IMT) on lung function prior to heart valve surgery and on postoperative lung function and pulmonary complications compared with sham and no IMT?</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A three-arm, multicentre, randomised controlled trial with concealed allocation, intention-to-treat analysis and blinded assessment of some outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>This study included 228 adults scheduled for heart valve surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>The IMT group received 3 days of IMT at 30% maximal inspiratory pressure, the sham IMT group received the same but at 10% maximal inspiratory pressure and the control group received no IMT.</div></div><div><h3>Outcome measures</h3><div>Spirometric measures, maximal inspiratory pressure and maximum voluntary ventilation were measured at hospital admission, the day before surgery and at discharge. The incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (primary outcome) and adverse events were recorded.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 215 participants completed surgery as planned and all participants were followed up until discharge. Spirometric measures, maximal inspiratory pressure and maximum voluntary ventilation improved in all groups between admission and the day before surgery, but more so in the IMT group. At discharge, these measures had deteriorated in all groups, but less so in the IMT group. Preoperative IMT reduced the total number of participants experiencing a pulmonary complication in the IMT group compared with the sham IMT group (ARR –0.18, 95% CI –0.33 to –0.03) and compared with the control group (ARR –0.21, 95% CI –0.35 to –0.05). Very few adverse events occurred in all three groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Preoperative IMT improved lung function prior to surgery and at hospital discharge and reduced postoperative pulmonary complications in adults undergoing elective heart valve surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Registration</h3><div>ChiCTR2100054869.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49153,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physiotherapy","volume":"71 1","pages":"Pages 27-34"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1836955324001267","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Question

What is the effect of 3 days of preoperative inspiratory muscle training (IMT) on lung function prior to heart valve surgery and on postoperative lung function and pulmonary complications compared with sham and no IMT?

Design

A three-arm, multicentre, randomised controlled trial with concealed allocation, intention-to-treat analysis and blinded assessment of some outcomes.

Participants

This study included 228 adults scheduled for heart valve surgery.

Interventions

The IMT group received 3 days of IMT at 30% maximal inspiratory pressure, the sham IMT group received the same but at 10% maximal inspiratory pressure and the control group received no IMT.

Outcome measures

Spirometric measures, maximal inspiratory pressure and maximum voluntary ventilation were measured at hospital admission, the day before surgery and at discharge. The incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (primary outcome) and adverse events were recorded.

Results

A total of 215 participants completed surgery as planned and all participants were followed up until discharge. Spirometric measures, maximal inspiratory pressure and maximum voluntary ventilation improved in all groups between admission and the day before surgery, but more so in the IMT group. At discharge, these measures had deteriorated in all groups, but less so in the IMT group. Preoperative IMT reduced the total number of participants experiencing a pulmonary complication in the IMT group compared with the sham IMT group (ARR –0.18, 95% CI –0.33 to –0.03) and compared with the control group (ARR –0.21, 95% CI –0.35 to –0.05). Very few adverse events occurred in all three groups.

Conclusions

Preoperative IMT improved lung function prior to surgery and at hospital discharge and reduced postoperative pulmonary complications in adults undergoing elective heart valve surgery.

Registration

ChiCTR2100054869.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
术前吸气肌训练可改善择期心脏瓣膜手术前的肺功能,并减少术后肺功能损伤和肺部并发症:一项随机试验。
问题与假吸气肌训练和不进行吸气肌训练相比,术前 3 天吸气肌训练(IMT)对心脏瓣膜手术前肺功能以及术后肺功能和肺部并发症有何影响?三臂、多中心、随机对照试验,采用隐蔽分配、意向治疗分析和部分结果的盲法评估:该研究包括228名计划接受心脏瓣膜手术的成人:IMT组接受为期3天的IMT,最大吸气压力为30%;假IMT组接受同样的IMT,但最大吸气压力为10%;对照组不接受IMT:入院时、手术前一天和出院时测量肺活量、最大吸气压力和最大自主通气量。记录术后肺部并发症(主要结果)和不良事件的发生率:共有 215 名参与者按计划完成了手术,所有参与者均接受了随访直至出院。从入院到手术前一天,各组患者的肺活量、最大吸气压力和最大自主通气量均有所改善,但 IMT 组的改善程度更大。出院时,这些指标在所有组别中都有所恶化,但在 IMT 组别中恶化程度较轻。与假IMT组相比(ARR为-0.18,95% CI为-0.33至-0.03),与对照组相比(ARR为-0.21,95% CI为-0.35至-0.05),术前IMT组出现肺部并发症的总人数有所减少。三组患者均很少发生不良反应:术前IMT改善了接受择期心脏瓣膜手术的成人术前和出院时的肺功能,并减少了术后肺部并发症:ChiCTR2100054869。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Physiotherapy
Journal of Physiotherapy ORTHOPEDICS-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
69
审稿时长
72 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Physiotherapy is the official journal of the Australian Physiotherapy Association. It aims to publish high-quality research with a significant impact on global physiotherapy practice. The journal's vision is to lead the field in supporting clinicians to access, understand, and implement research evidence that will enhance person-centred care. In January 2008, the Journal of Physiotherapy became the first physiotherapy journal to adhere to the ICMJE requirement of registering randomized trials with a recognized Trial Registry. The journal prioritizes systematic reviews, clinical trials, economic analyses, experimental studies, qualitative studies, epidemiological studies, and observational studies. In January 2014, it also became the first core physiotherapy/physical therapy journal to provide free access to editorials and peer-reviewed original research. The Australian Physiotherapy Association extended their support for excellence in physiotherapy practice by sponsoring open access publication of all Journal of Physiotherapy content in 2016. As a result, all past, present, and future journal articles are freely accessible, and there are no author fees for publication.
期刊最新文献
Contents Critically appraised paper: An individualised, progressive walking and education intervention reduces the risk of low back pain recurrence [synopsis] Critically appraised paper: An individualised, progressive walking and education intervention reduces the risk of low back pain recurrence [commentary] Critically appraised paper: An internet intervention with or without telephone support in primary care is not superior to usual care for low back pain [commentary] Appraisal of Clinical Practice Guideline: Australian Physical Activity Clinical Practice Guideline for people with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury 2024
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1