Management of dialysis access in the post-transplantation patient.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Seminars in Vascular Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2024.10.005
Lindsay Lynch, Kevin Chang, Ashlee Stutsrim, Maureen Sheehan, Matthew Edwards
{"title":"Management of dialysis access in the post-transplantation patient.","authors":"Lindsay Lynch, Kevin Chang, Ashlee Stutsrim, Maureen Sheehan, Matthew Edwards","doi":"10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2024.10.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the preferred access for hemodialysis in patients with end-stage renal disease, and arteriovenous grafts are used when AVF creation is not feasible. Post renal transplantation, hemodialysis may be needed due to delayed graft function or transplantation failure. This review aimed to summarize current evidence on the impact of maintaining versus ligating AV access on renal function and cardiovascular outcomes post transplantation. A comprehensive review of literature was conducted, analyzing studies on the effects of AVF and AV graft maintenance or ligation on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients post transplantation. Evidence indicates that maintaining AVF post transplantation is associated with higher estimated glomerular filtration rate and better renal function retention, but poses risks for cardiovascular complications, such as left ventricular hypertrophy. Ligation of AVF is linked to improved cardiovascular outcomes, including reduced N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels, but may lead to a greater decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate. No significant difference in long-term renal allograft survival was observed between maintaining and ligating AV access. The decision to maintain or ligate AV access in patients post renal transplantation should be individualized, considering both renal function preservation and cardiovascular health. Although maintaining AVF may benefit renal function, it poses cardiovascular risks, whereas ligation can mitigate these risks without significantly affecting allograft survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":51153,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Vascular Surgery","volume":"37 4","pages":"407-411"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2024.10.005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the preferred access for hemodialysis in patients with end-stage renal disease, and arteriovenous grafts are used when AVF creation is not feasible. Post renal transplantation, hemodialysis may be needed due to delayed graft function or transplantation failure. This review aimed to summarize current evidence on the impact of maintaining versus ligating AV access on renal function and cardiovascular outcomes post transplantation. A comprehensive review of literature was conducted, analyzing studies on the effects of AVF and AV graft maintenance or ligation on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients post transplantation. Evidence indicates that maintaining AVF post transplantation is associated with higher estimated glomerular filtration rate and better renal function retention, but poses risks for cardiovascular complications, such as left ventricular hypertrophy. Ligation of AVF is linked to improved cardiovascular outcomes, including reduced N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels, but may lead to a greater decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate. No significant difference in long-term renal allograft survival was observed between maintaining and ligating AV access. The decision to maintain or ligate AV access in patients post renal transplantation should be individualized, considering both renal function preservation and cardiovascular health. Although maintaining AVF may benefit renal function, it poses cardiovascular risks, whereas ligation can mitigate these risks without significantly affecting allograft survival.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
移植后患者透析通路的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Each issue of Seminars in Vascular Surgery examines the latest thinking on a particular clinical problem and features new diagnostic and operative techniques. The journal allows practitioners to expand their capabilities and to keep pace with the most rapidly evolving areas of surgery.
期刊最新文献
Choice of dialysis access: Catheter, peritoneal, or hemodialysis. Effects of dialysis on peripheral arterial disease. Management of dialysis access in the post-transplantation patient. Introduction. Management of carotid disease in the end-stage renal disease patient.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1