Clinical trial knowledge, discussion, and participation among cancer survivors: A HINTS-SEER study

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Patient Education and Counseling Pub Date : 2024-12-12 DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2024.108605
Erin O. Wissler Gerdes , Sarah H. Nash , Robin C. Vanderpool , Erin L. Van Blarigan , Angela L.W. Meisner , Nicole Senft Everson
{"title":"Clinical trial knowledge, discussion, and participation among cancer survivors: A HINTS-SEER study","authors":"Erin O. Wissler Gerdes ,&nbsp;Sarah H. Nash ,&nbsp;Robin C. Vanderpool ,&nbsp;Erin L. Van Blarigan ,&nbsp;Angela L.W. Meisner ,&nbsp;Nicole Senft Everson","doi":"10.1016/j.pec.2024.108605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Clinical trial knowledge and discussions about clinical trials with healthcare providers contribute to clinical trial participation and clinical trial representation. This study explored 1) the association of patient-provider communication with clinical trial knowledge, 2) how patient-provider communication impacts the associations of demographic and clinical factors with clinical trial knowledge, and 3) motivations for clinical trial participation among people with a history of cancer.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Cross-sectional data from the 2021 Health Information National Trends Survey-Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (HINTS-SEER) study included 1201 adult cancer survivors recruited from three SEER registries. Multivariable logistic regression models estimated adjusted associations of sociodemographic and clinical characteristics with clinical trial knowledge (none, a little bit/a lot) with and without the inclusion of clinical trial discussion with a healthcare provider (yes, no).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Approximately three-quarters of cancer survivors reported having at least “a little” knowledge about clinical trials, though only 15 % reported having discussed clinical trials with their provider. Those who reported patient-provider communication about clinical trials had 8.71 times higher odds of having some clinical trial knowledge. In multivariable logistic regression, odds of knowing at least a little bit about clinical trials were lower among adults without a college degree and among Hispanic and Non-Hispanic Asian (versus Non-Hispanic White) adults. Associations of demographic factors with clinical trial knowledge were not impacted by the inclusion of patient-provider discussion in the model. Top motivations for clinical trial participation were helping other people, new treatment, and getting better.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion/practice implications</h3><div>There is a need to ensure information about clinical trials is provided to all people with cancer and to facilitate high quality communication between patients and providers about clinical trials.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49714,"journal":{"name":"Patient Education and Counseling","volume":"132 ","pages":"Article 108605"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient Education and Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738399124004725","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Clinical trial knowledge and discussions about clinical trials with healthcare providers contribute to clinical trial participation and clinical trial representation. This study explored 1) the association of patient-provider communication with clinical trial knowledge, 2) how patient-provider communication impacts the associations of demographic and clinical factors with clinical trial knowledge, and 3) motivations for clinical trial participation among people with a history of cancer.

Methods

Cross-sectional data from the 2021 Health Information National Trends Survey-Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (HINTS-SEER) study included 1201 adult cancer survivors recruited from three SEER registries. Multivariable logistic regression models estimated adjusted associations of sociodemographic and clinical characteristics with clinical trial knowledge (none, a little bit/a lot) with and without the inclusion of clinical trial discussion with a healthcare provider (yes, no).

Results

Approximately three-quarters of cancer survivors reported having at least “a little” knowledge about clinical trials, though only 15 % reported having discussed clinical trials with their provider. Those who reported patient-provider communication about clinical trials had 8.71 times higher odds of having some clinical trial knowledge. In multivariable logistic regression, odds of knowing at least a little bit about clinical trials were lower among adults without a college degree and among Hispanic and Non-Hispanic Asian (versus Non-Hispanic White) adults. Associations of demographic factors with clinical trial knowledge were not impacted by the inclusion of patient-provider discussion in the model. Top motivations for clinical trial participation were helping other people, new treatment, and getting better.

Conclusion/practice implications

There is a need to ensure information about clinical trials is provided to all people with cancer and to facilitate high quality communication between patients and providers about clinical trials.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
癌症幸存者对临床试验的了解、讨论和参与:HINTS-SEER 研究。
目的:临床试验知识和与医疗保健提供者讨论临床试验有助于临床试验参与和临床试验代表性。本研究探讨1)医患沟通与临床试验知识的关联,2)医患沟通如何影响人口学和临床因素与临床试验知识的关联,以及3)癌症史患者参与临床试验的动机。方法:来自2021年健康信息国家趋势调查-监测、流行病学和最终结果(HINTS-SEER)研究的横断面数据包括从三个SEER登记处招募的1201名成年癌症幸存者。多变量逻辑回归模型估计了社会人口学和临床特征与临床试验知识(无,一点点/很多)的调整后的关联,无论是否包含与医疗保健提供者的临床试验讨论(是,否)。结果:大约四分之三的癌症幸存者报告至少对临床试验有“一点”了解,尽管只有15% %的人报告与他们的提供者讨论过临床试验。那些报告患者与提供者就临床试验进行沟通的人拥有一些临床试验知识的几率高出8.71倍。在多变量逻辑回归中,在没有大学学位的成年人以及西班牙裔和非西班牙裔亚裔成年人(相对于非西班牙裔白人)中,至少了解一点临床试验的几率较低。人口统计学因素与临床试验知识的关联不受模型中患者与提供者讨论的影响。参与临床试验的主要动机是帮助他人,新的治疗方法,以及变得更好。结论/实践意义:有必要确保向所有癌症患者提供有关临床试验的信息,并促进患者和提供者之间关于临床试验的高质量沟通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Patient Education and Counseling
Patient Education and Counseling 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
11.40%
发文量
384
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Patient Education and Counseling is an interdisciplinary, international journal for patient education and health promotion researchers, managers and clinicians. The journal seeks to explore and elucidate the educational, counseling and communication models in health care. Its aim is to provide a forum for fundamental as well as applied research, and to promote the study of organizational issues involved with the delivery of patient education, counseling, health promotion services and training models in improving communication between providers and patients.
期刊最新文献
Designing and maturing the OKRA-Compass for breaking bad news in the German pediatric oncology setting: A participatory action research study Lung cancer screening: What do physicians say to reluctant patients and what do patients want them to say? Personalized medical approach: A strategy to enhance parents' psychological well-being in child care Editorial Board A nurse-led approach to testing and adapting a telehealth guide for e-empathy in goals of care conversations for Black patients with chronic kidney disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1