Practitioners' perspectives on unintended effects of illicit drug use prevention public service announcements in Australia.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Health Promotion International Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1093/heapro/daae185
Kirsteen Munro, Svetlana Bogomolova, Lucy Simmonds
{"title":"Practitioners' perspectives on unintended effects of illicit drug use prevention public service announcements in Australia.","authors":"Kirsteen Munro, Svetlana Bogomolova, Lucy Simmonds","doi":"10.1093/heapro/daae185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Public service announcements (PSAs) or campaigns aimed at preventing harm can inadvertently risk creating additional harms. It remains unclear whether these unintended effects are considered during campaign development, if risk mitigation strategies are implemented, or how professionals involved perceive these issues. It is in the context of illicit drug use prevention PSAs that our research investigates and explores the perspectives of practitioners-health support professionals and advertising campaign designers and creators. Semi-structured expert interviews were conducted to capture and synthesize practitioners' perspectives which were then analysed by applying a framework to address the unintended effects of public health interventions. The results indicated that practitioners from both sectors are aware of unintended harms but place varying levels of importance on different aspects. In the case of illicit drug prevention PSAs, incorporating practitioners' perspectives in campaign development may result in mitigating the risk of potential unintended harmful effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":54256,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion International","volume":"39 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daae185","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Public service announcements (PSAs) or campaigns aimed at preventing harm can inadvertently risk creating additional harms. It remains unclear whether these unintended effects are considered during campaign development, if risk mitigation strategies are implemented, or how professionals involved perceive these issues. It is in the context of illicit drug use prevention PSAs that our research investigates and explores the perspectives of practitioners-health support professionals and advertising campaign designers and creators. Semi-structured expert interviews were conducted to capture and synthesize practitioners' perspectives which were then analysed by applying a framework to address the unintended effects of public health interventions. The results indicated that practitioners from both sectors are aware of unintended harms but place varying levels of importance on different aspects. In the case of illicit drug prevention PSAs, incorporating practitioners' perspectives in campaign development may result in mitigating the risk of potential unintended harmful effects.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳大利亚从业人员对预防非法药物使用公益广告意外影响的看法。
旨在预防伤害的公益广告(PSA)或宣传活动可能会无意中造成额外伤害的风险。目前仍不清楚在活动开发过程中是否考虑了这些意外影响,是否实施了风险缓解策略,也不清楚相关专业人员如何看待这些问题。我们的研究正是以预防非法药物使用公益广告为背景,调查并探讨了从业人员--健康支持专业人员以及广告活动设计者和创作者的观点。我们进行了半结构式专家访谈,以捕捉和综合从业人员的观点,然后通过应用一个框架来分析公共卫生干预措施的意外影响。结果表明,两个部门的从业人员都意识到了意外伤害,但对不同方面的重视程度不同。就预防非法药物的公益广告而言,将从业人员的观点纳入宣传活动的制定过程可能会降低潜在意外伤害的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Promotion International
Health Promotion International Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.40%
发文量
146
期刊介绍: Health Promotion International contains refereed original articles, reviews, and debate articles on major themes and innovations in the health promotion field. In line with the remits of the series of global conferences on health promotion the journal expressly invites contributions from sectors beyond health. These may include education, employment, government, the media, industry, environmental agencies, and community networks. As the thought journal of the international health promotion movement we seek in particular theoretical, methodological and activist advances to the field. Thus, the journal provides a unique focal point for articles of high quality that describe not only theories and concepts, research projects and policy formulation, but also planned and spontaneous activities, organizational change, as well as social and environmental development.
期刊最新文献
Non-government advocacy for health equity: evidence from Australia. A mixed-methods study among adolescents and teachers in Bogotá, Colombia: adapting the OurFutures Alcohol Program. Adding sugar to children's beverages: a theory of planned behavior study of Lebanese mothers. Intimidation against advocates and researchers in the tobacco, alcohol and ultra-processed food spaces: a review. Resisting industry narratives: guidance to avoid tobacco and nicotine industry framing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1