Is this a stroke? The profile of patients with suspected acute cerebrovascular accident transferred by ambulance to the Neurology Emergency Department.

Postepy psychiatrii neurologii Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-17 DOI:10.5114/ppn.2024.144939
Jakub Malkiewicz, Michał Borończyk, Julia Węgrzynek-Gallina, Marcella Mrózek, Sofija Antoniuk, Tomasz Chmiela, Joanna Siuda
{"title":"Is this a stroke? The profile of patients with suspected acute cerebrovascular accident transferred by ambulance to the Neurology Emergency Department.","authors":"Jakub Malkiewicz, Michał Borończyk, Julia Węgrzynek-Gallina, Marcella Mrózek, Sofija Antoniuk, Tomasz Chmiela, Joanna Siuda","doi":"10.5114/ppn.2024.144939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Stroke mimics (SMs) are conditions that present similarly to acute cerebrovascular accidents (CVA), potentially leading to diagnostic errors made by physicians or emergency medical teams (EMT). This study aimed to analyse the profile of patients transferred by EMT to the neurological emergency department (NED) with suspected CVA, and to assess the incidence and characteristics of SMs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed data from patients admitted to the NED with suspected CVA, transferred by EMT between August 1, 2021 and to January 31, 2022. Data collected included demographic and clinical information obtained both from NED and EMT records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 281 patients with suspected CVA were admitted to the NED, of which 74 (26.3%) were diagnosed as SMs. The most common SMs were seizures (24.3%) and infections (14.9%). CVA occurrence was significantly associated with central facial palsy, speech disorders, pyramidal signs and arterial hypertension, but confusion and active cancer were more commonly linked to SMs diagnosis. Patients whose emergency medical cards were correctly completed were less likely to be diagnosed with SMs compared to those with at least one missing parameter (36% in the CVA group vs. 21% in the SMs group, p = 0.029).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Focal neurological signs are indicative of CVA, whereas confusion and a history of active cancer are more commonly associated with SMs. The accuracy and completeness of data collected by EMTs may play a crucial role in the CVA diagnostic process, potentially reducing misdiagnoses of SMs.</p>","PeriodicalId":74481,"journal":{"name":"Postepy psychiatrii neurologii","volume":"33 3","pages":"129-137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11635431/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postepy psychiatrii neurologii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/ppn.2024.144939","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Stroke mimics (SMs) are conditions that present similarly to acute cerebrovascular accidents (CVA), potentially leading to diagnostic errors made by physicians or emergency medical teams (EMT). This study aimed to analyse the profile of patients transferred by EMT to the neurological emergency department (NED) with suspected CVA, and to assess the incidence and characteristics of SMs.

Methods: This retrospective study analyzed data from patients admitted to the NED with suspected CVA, transferred by EMT between August 1, 2021 and to January 31, 2022. Data collected included demographic and clinical information obtained both from NED and EMT records.

Results: During the study period, 281 patients with suspected CVA were admitted to the NED, of which 74 (26.3%) were diagnosed as SMs. The most common SMs were seizures (24.3%) and infections (14.9%). CVA occurrence was significantly associated with central facial palsy, speech disorders, pyramidal signs and arterial hypertension, but confusion and active cancer were more commonly linked to SMs diagnosis. Patients whose emergency medical cards were correctly completed were less likely to be diagnosed with SMs compared to those with at least one missing parameter (36% in the CVA group vs. 21% in the SMs group, p = 0.029).

Conclusions: Focal neurological signs are indicative of CVA, whereas confusion and a history of active cancer are more commonly associated with SMs. The accuracy and completeness of data collected by EMTs may play a crucial role in the CVA diagnostic process, potentially reducing misdiagnoses of SMs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
这是中风吗?由救护车转至神经科急诊室的疑似急性脑血管意外患者的概况。
目的:模拟卒中(SMs)是一种与急性脑血管意外(CVA)表现相似的病症,有可能导致医生或急救医疗队(EMT)诊断错误。本研究旨在分析由急救医疗队转至神经急诊科(NED)的疑似 CVA 患者的概况,并评估 SMs 的发生率和特征:这项回顾性研究分析了2021年8月1日至2022年1月31日期间由急救医疗队转入神经急诊科的疑似CVA患者的数据。收集的数据包括从北医三院和急救队记录中获得的人口统计学和临床信息:在研究期间,281 名疑似 CVA 患者被送入 NED,其中 74 人(26.3%)被诊断为 SM。最常见的 SMs 是癫痫发作(24.3%)和感染(14.9%)。CVA的发生与中枢性面瘫、语言障碍、锥体束征和动脉高血压有明显关联,但意识模糊和活动性癌症更常见于SMs诊断。与至少有一项参数缺失的患者相比,急诊医疗卡填写正确的患者被诊断为 SMs 的可能性较低(CVA 组为 36%,SMs 组为 21%,P = 0.029):结论:局灶性神经体征是 CVA 的指征,而意识模糊和活动性癌症病史更常见于 SMs。急救医生收集数据的准确性和完整性可能在 CVA 诊断过程中起到至关重要的作用,有可能减少 SMs 的误诊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pathology and treatment methods in pantothenate kinase-associated neurodegeneration. Secretome - the role of extracellular vesicles in the pathogenesis and therapy of neurodegenerative diseases. Severe headache as the first presentation of post-COVID-19 brain and spinal cord injury resembling neurosarcoidosis. The effect of denosumab vs. zoledronic acid in preventing skeletal-related events, including pain-related bone metastasis: a systematic review. Communication issues in co-occurring ADHD and autism spectrum disorders. Evaluative approaches and targeted interventions: mini review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1