The Multifocal Pathway: A Pilot Study of a Trainee-Led Multifocal Intraocular Lens Protocol in a Tertiary Referral Hospital in Australia.

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) Pub Date : 2024-12-11 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S484884
Lauren Sartor, Christopher Ze Qian Go, Cheng F Kong, Season T W Yeung, Andrew White, Chameen Samarawickrama
{"title":"The Multifocal Pathway: A Pilot Study of a Trainee-Led Multifocal Intraocular Lens Protocol in a Tertiary Referral Hospital in Australia.","authors":"Lauren Sartor, Christopher Ze Qian Go, Cheng F Kong, Season T W Yeung, Andrew White, Chameen Samarawickrama","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S484884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To develop a selection pathway to facilitate the use of multifocal intraocular lenses (mfIOLs) in cataract surgery in a public hospital setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-surgeon prospective cohort study in an Australian tertiary referral public hospital was conducted. A mfIOL selection pathway was designed and assessed. Outcomes measured included unaided distance (UDVA), intermediate (UIVA) and near visual acuity (UNVA), dysphotopsia, spectacle dependence and satisfaction. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were assessed using Catquest-9SF (CQ) and Near Visual Acuity Questionnaire (NAVQ). A cost-analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-four eyes from 27 patients underwent cataract surgery with mfIOL implantation. The monocular UDVA (mean ± standard deviation) was 0.05 ± 0.12 logMAR; UIVA 0.19 ± 0.05 logMAR; UNVA 0.28 ± 0.14 logMAR; 87% and 98% of eyes achieved within 0.5D and 1.0D of target refraction respectively. Spectacle independence was 85% at distance, 81% at intermediate, 59% at near vision. High satisfaction was reported with CQ (>85%) and NAVQ (100%). The cost difference between bilateral monofocal and mfIOLs is comparable to a pair of spectacles. Projected annual cost to the health system for a 5%-10% eligibility rate is 1.1-2.3 million Australian dollars.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The selection pathway presented overcomes the challenges in patient selection inherent to a public hospital setting and was implemented by a senior trainee with excellent vision and PROMs. The pathway ensures the cost-effectiveness of mfOL implantation. There are several funding models that can be applied to support equitable access and improved visual outcomes with mfIOLs within the government funded health system.</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":"18 ","pages":"3693-3706"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11646369/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S484884","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To develop a selection pathway to facilitate the use of multifocal intraocular lenses (mfIOLs) in cataract surgery in a public hospital setting.

Methods: A single-surgeon prospective cohort study in an Australian tertiary referral public hospital was conducted. A mfIOL selection pathway was designed and assessed. Outcomes measured included unaided distance (UDVA), intermediate (UIVA) and near visual acuity (UNVA), dysphotopsia, spectacle dependence and satisfaction. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were assessed using Catquest-9SF (CQ) and Near Visual Acuity Questionnaire (NAVQ). A cost-analysis was performed.

Results: Fifty-four eyes from 27 patients underwent cataract surgery with mfIOL implantation. The monocular UDVA (mean ± standard deviation) was 0.05 ± 0.12 logMAR; UIVA 0.19 ± 0.05 logMAR; UNVA 0.28 ± 0.14 logMAR; 87% and 98% of eyes achieved within 0.5D and 1.0D of target refraction respectively. Spectacle independence was 85% at distance, 81% at intermediate, 59% at near vision. High satisfaction was reported with CQ (>85%) and NAVQ (100%). The cost difference between bilateral monofocal and mfIOLs is comparable to a pair of spectacles. Projected annual cost to the health system for a 5%-10% eligibility rate is 1.1-2.3 million Australian dollars.

Conclusion: The selection pathway presented overcomes the challenges in patient selection inherent to a public hospital setting and was implemented by a senior trainee with excellent vision and PROMs. The pathway ensures the cost-effectiveness of mfOL implantation. There are several funding models that can be applied to support equitable access and improved visual outcomes with mfIOLs within the government funded health system.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多焦路径:在澳大利亚一家三级转诊医院开展的由受训人员主导的多焦点眼内透镜方案试点研究。
目的:探讨公立医院白内障手术中多焦人工晶状体(mfIOLs)的选择途径。方法:在澳大利亚三级转诊公立医院进行单外科医生前瞻性队列研究。设计并评估了mfIOL选择途径。测量的结果包括独立距离(UDVA)、中间(UIVA)和近视力(UNVA)、视力障碍、眼镜依赖和满意度。采用Catquest-9SF (CQ)和近视力问卷(NAVQ)对患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)进行评估。进行了成本分析。结果:27例患者54眼行人工晶状体植入术。单眼UDVA(平均值±标准差)为0.05±0.12 logMAR;UIVA 0.19±0.05 logMAR;UNVA 0.28±0.14 logMAR;87%和98%的眼睛分别达到0.5D和1.0D以内的目标折射。眼镜独立性在远视为85%,中视为81%,近视为59%。CQ(>85%)和NAVQ(100%)满意度较高。双侧单焦点和多焦点的成本差异相当于一副眼镜。5%-10%的合格率对医疗系统的预计年度成本为110万- 230万澳元。结论:本文提出的选择途径克服了公立医院在患者选择方面的固有挑战,并由一名具有良好视力和专业知识的高级实习生实施。该通道确保了mfOL植入的成本效益。在政府资助的卫生系统内,有几种供资模式可用于支持mfiol的公平获取和改善视力结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of IMO vifa24plus(1-2) and Humphrey Field Analyzer 24-2. Visual Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction of Two Continuous Range of Vision Intraocular Lenses. Application of the 2021 AAPOS Guidelines in Clinics with Revision and Validation of SPOT Referral Criteria. Clinical Evaluation of Faricimab in Real-World Diabetic Macular Edema in India- A Multicenter Observational Study. Propensity Score to Compare Pars Plana Vitrectomy and Scleral Buckling in Retrospective Studies [Letter].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1