Probability of vertical HIV transmission: A systematic review and meta-regression.

Magdalene K Walters, Michelle A Bulterys, Michael Barry, Sarah Hicks, Ann Richey, Margalit Sabin, Diana Louden, Mary Mahy, John Stover, Robert Glaubius, Hmwe Kyu, Marie-Claude Boily, Lynne Mofenson, Kathleen Powis, Jeffrey W Imai-Eaton
{"title":"Probability of vertical HIV transmission: A systematic review and meta-regression.","authors":"Magdalene K Walters, Michelle A Bulterys, Michael Barry, Sarah Hicks, Ann Richey, Margalit Sabin, Diana Louden, Mary Mahy, John Stover, Robert Glaubius, Hmwe Kyu, Marie-Claude Boily, Lynne Mofenson, Kathleen Powis, Jeffrey W Imai-Eaton","doi":"10.1101/2024.12.03.24318418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Eliminating HIV vertical transmission (VT) is a global priority and monitored by estimating paediatric HIV infections with the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS supported Spectrum AIDS Impact Module (Spectrum-AIM). Recent innovations in antiretroviral therapy (ART) service delivery models and first-line regimens aimed to reduce VT probabilities. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate VT probabilities by maternal immunologic and treatment status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We combined an updated systematic review with previous data in meta-regression models to estimate VT probabilities and determinants. We searched multiple databases for peer-reviewed English-language studies from all regions published between January 2018 and February 2024 with VT data stratified by maternal immunologic or treatment status from randomized trials, cohort, or observational studies. Four meta-regression models estimated VT probabilities. We assessed model sensitivity and compared estimates to Spectrum-AIM's previous results. Finally, we fit a meta-regression model to assess the association of ART class and initiation timing on viral load suppression (VLS) at delivery.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The updated review identified 24 new studies, yielding 110 total studies included in meta-regression analysis. For women not receiving ART, higher CD4 was associated with lower odds of perinatal VT (odds ratio [OR] 0.80 (95% CI: 0.75-0.84) per 100 CD4 cells/μL increase). For pregnant women on ART, each additional week on ART before delivery reduced odds of VT by 5.6% (3.2%-7.0%). The odds ratio of perinatal VT among pregnant women initiating integrase inhibitor-based ART 20 weeks pre-delivery was 0.36 (0.14-0.94) compared to those initiating non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI)-based ART. This association was confounded by study region. Odds of VLS were lower when ART was initiated late in pregnancy (OR: 0.37 (0.21-0.68) for the reference regimen (NNRTI)), without significant difference by ART regimen.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>VT probability varies by maternal immunologic stage, treatment regimen, and timing of treatment initiation. These estimates have been incorporated into Spectrum-AIM for UNAIDS 2025 HIV estimates. Earlier ART initiation is associated with higher odds of VLS at delivery. Further evidence is needed on the effects of recent ART innovations on VT outcomes.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>NIH, UNAIDS, and UKRI.</p>","PeriodicalId":94281,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11643157/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.12.03.24318418","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Eliminating HIV vertical transmission (VT) is a global priority and monitored by estimating paediatric HIV infections with the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS supported Spectrum AIDS Impact Module (Spectrum-AIM). Recent innovations in antiretroviral therapy (ART) service delivery models and first-line regimens aimed to reduce VT probabilities. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate VT probabilities by maternal immunologic and treatment status.

Methods: We combined an updated systematic review with previous data in meta-regression models to estimate VT probabilities and determinants. We searched multiple databases for peer-reviewed English-language studies from all regions published between January 2018 and February 2024 with VT data stratified by maternal immunologic or treatment status from randomized trials, cohort, or observational studies. Four meta-regression models estimated VT probabilities. We assessed model sensitivity and compared estimates to Spectrum-AIM's previous results. Finally, we fit a meta-regression model to assess the association of ART class and initiation timing on viral load suppression (VLS) at delivery.

Findings: The updated review identified 24 new studies, yielding 110 total studies included in meta-regression analysis. For women not receiving ART, higher CD4 was associated with lower odds of perinatal VT (odds ratio [OR] 0.80 (95% CI: 0.75-0.84) per 100 CD4 cells/μL increase). For pregnant women on ART, each additional week on ART before delivery reduced odds of VT by 5.6% (3.2%-7.0%). The odds ratio of perinatal VT among pregnant women initiating integrase inhibitor-based ART 20 weeks pre-delivery was 0.36 (0.14-0.94) compared to those initiating non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI)-based ART. This association was confounded by study region. Odds of VLS were lower when ART was initiated late in pregnancy (OR: 0.37 (0.21-0.68) for the reference regimen (NNRTI)), without significant difference by ART regimen.

Interpretation: VT probability varies by maternal immunologic stage, treatment regimen, and timing of treatment initiation. These estimates have been incorporated into Spectrum-AIM for UNAIDS 2025 HIV estimates. Earlier ART initiation is associated with higher odds of VLS at delivery. Further evidence is needed on the effects of recent ART innovations on VT outcomes.

Funding: NIH, UNAIDS, and UKRI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
艾滋病毒垂直传播的概率:系统回顾与元回归。
背景:消除艾滋病毒垂直传播(VT)是全球的优先事项。儿科艾滋病毒感染的估计通常是通过数学模型得出的,该模型依赖于文献中根据产妇免疫和治疗状况分层的VT率,即联合国艾滋病规划署支持的艾滋病影响谱模块(Spectrum- aim),以评估消除VT的进展。默认VT概率上次更新是在2018年,从那时起,服务提供和抗逆转录病毒治疗方案发生了重大变化。方法:我们的目的是(1)更新与Spectrum-AIM兼容的母亲状态VT概率的系统综述;(2)进行meta回归,系统地汇总研究,以估计具有统计不确定性的VT概率;(3)评估VT的决定因素,包括母亲病毒载量。我们检索了PubMed、Embase、全球健康数据库、WHO全球医学索引、CINAHL Complete和Cochrane CENTRAL,检索了来自所有地理区域的同行评议的英文文章,其中包含随机对照试验、队列研究或观察性研究的VT数据。我们排除了没有通过产妇治疗或免疫状态来区分VT的来源。我们拟合了四个元回归模型,以产生与Spectrum-AIM中使用的分层相兼容的VT概率估计,并评估了与Spectrum-AIM中的默认参数相比,更新的VT概率如何估计新的儿科感染。我们进行了亚组分析来评估纳入研究如何影响模型估计。最后,我们拟合了一个元回归模型来评估ART类别和起始时间对分娩时病毒载量抑制的影响。研究结果:更新后的系统评价确定了2018年1月至2024年2月期间发表的24项新研究。结合以往的综述资料,meta回归分析纳入了110项研究。估计数与以前的审查大致一致。对于未接受预防母婴传播的妇女,研究人群中CD4中位数每增加100 mm 3,围产期传播的几率降低0.20(0.16-0.25)。在怀孕期间接受抗逆转录病毒治疗的妇女中,分娩前每多接受一周抗逆转录病毒治疗,VT的几率降低5.6%(4.3%-6.8%)。ART方案类别影响VT概率;分娩前20周开始以insi为基础的方案与以nnrti为基础的方案的WLHIV围产儿VT的比值比为0.355(0.140-0.898)。然而,这种效应被研究区域所混淆。在妊娠晚期开始抗逆转录病毒治疗的妇女中,分娩时病毒载量的抑制显著降低(p=0.02),但在抗逆转录病毒治疗类别之间没有显著差异(p= 0.05)。解释:垂直传播率根据产妇免疫阶段、预防方案和开始治疗的时间而有很大差异。分娩前开始抗逆转录病毒治疗的时间与分娩时病毒载量的抑制密切相关。我们的估计及其不确定性可用于Spectrum-AIM,以估算儿科发病率,为资助提供信息,并监测消除vt的进展情况。资助:美国国立卫生研究院、联合国艾滋病规划署和医学研究委员会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Beyond severity: Mapping cognitive heterogeneity in schizophrenia at the structural level. Normative Modelling of Brain Volume in Multiple Sclerosis. Feature consistency in transdiagnostic connectome-based models of sustained attention and autism symptoms. Bilingualism's protective effects in Alzheimer's disease: Mechanisms of resilience and resistance. Beyond Rurality: Individual Socioeconomic Status and Chronic Disease Prevalence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1