Blood Pressure Estimation Using Explainable Deep-Learning Models Based on Photoplethysmography

Jade Perdereau, Thibaut Chamoux, Etienne Gayat, Arthur Le Gall, Fabrice Vallée, Jérôme Cartailler, Jona Joachim
{"title":"Blood Pressure Estimation Using Explainable Deep-Learning Models Based on Photoplethysmography","authors":"Jade Perdereau, Thibaut Chamoux, Etienne Gayat, Arthur Le Gall, Fabrice Vallée, Jérôme Cartailler, Jona Joachim","doi":"10.1213/ane.0000000000007295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". We developed a deep-learning model that reconstructs continuous mean arterial pressure (MAP) using the photoplethysmograhy (PPG) signal and compared it to the arterial line gold standard. METHODS: We analyzed high-frequency PPG signals from 117 patients in neuroradiology and digestive surgery with a median of 2201 (interquartile range [IQR], 788–4775) measurements per patient. We compared models with different combinations of convolutional and recurrent layers using as inputs for our neural network high-frequency PPG and derived features including dicrotic notch relative amplitude, perfusion index, and heart rate. Mean absolute error (MAE) was used as performance metrics. Explainability of the deep-learning model was reconstructed with Grad-CAM, a visualization technique using saliency maps to highlight the parts of an input that are significant for a deep-learning model decision-making process. RESULTS: An MAP baseline model, which consisted only of standard cuff measures, reached an MAE of 6.1 (± 14.5) mm Hg. In contrast, the deep-learning model achieved an MAE of 3.5 (± 4.4) mm Hg on the external test set (a 42.6% improvement). This model also achieved the narrowest confidence intervals and met international standards used within the community (grade A). The saliency map revealed that the deep-learning model primarily extracts information near the dicrotic notch region. CONCLUSIONS: Our deep-learning model noninvasively estimates arterial pressure with high accuracy. This model may show potential as a decision-support tool in operating-room settings, particularly in scenarios where invasive blood pressure monitoring is unavailable....","PeriodicalId":7799,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia & Analgesia","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia & Analgesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000007295","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

. We developed a deep-learning model that reconstructs continuous mean arterial pressure (MAP) using the photoplethysmograhy (PPG) signal and compared it to the arterial line gold standard. METHODS: We analyzed high-frequency PPG signals from 117 patients in neuroradiology and digestive surgery with a median of 2201 (interquartile range [IQR], 788–4775) measurements per patient. We compared models with different combinations of convolutional and recurrent layers using as inputs for our neural network high-frequency PPG and derived features including dicrotic notch relative amplitude, perfusion index, and heart rate. Mean absolute error (MAE) was used as performance metrics. Explainability of the deep-learning model was reconstructed with Grad-CAM, a visualization technique using saliency maps to highlight the parts of an input that are significant for a deep-learning model decision-making process. RESULTS: An MAP baseline model, which consisted only of standard cuff measures, reached an MAE of 6.1 (± 14.5) mm Hg. In contrast, the deep-learning model achieved an MAE of 3.5 (± 4.4) mm Hg on the external test set (a 42.6% improvement). This model also achieved the narrowest confidence intervals and met international standards used within the community (grade A). The saliency map revealed that the deep-learning model primarily extracts information near the dicrotic notch region. CONCLUSIONS: Our deep-learning model noninvasively estimates arterial pressure with high accuracy. This model may show potential as a decision-support tool in operating-room settings, particularly in scenarios where invasive blood pressure monitoring is unavailable....
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用基于光敏血压计的可解释深度学习模型估测血压
.我们开发了一种深度学习模型,该模型可使用光电血压计 (PPG) 信号重建连续平均动脉压 (MAP),并将其与动脉管路金标准进行比较。方法:我们分析了神经放射科和消化外科 117 位患者的高频 PPG 信号,每位患者的中位测量值为 2201(四分位数间距 [IQR],788-4775)。我们比较了不同卷积层和递归层组合的模型,这些模型使用高频 PPG 作为神经网络的输入,并衍生出包括微凹槽相对振幅、灌注指数和心率在内的特征。平均绝对误差(MAE)被用作性能指标。使用 Grad-CAM 重构了深度学习模型的可解释性,Grad-CAM 是一种可视化技术,使用显著性图突出显示输入中对深度学习模型决策过程具有重要意义的部分。结果:仅由标准袖带测量值组成的 MAP 基线模型的 MAE 为 6.1 (± 14.5) mm Hg。相比之下,深度学习模型在外部测试集上的 MAE 为 3.5 (± 4.4) mm Hg(提高了 42.6%)。该模型还达到了最窄的置信区间,符合国际通用标准(A 级)。突出图显示,深度学习模型主要提取了微凹口区域附近的信息。结论:我们的深度学习模型可以无创、高精度地估算动脉压。该模型有望成为手术室环境中的决策支持工具,尤其是在有创血压监测无法使用的情况下....。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contextualizing AI Evaluation in Anesthesiology: Interpreting Large Language Models and Computer Vision Metrics Across Clinical Use Cases-An Expert Statement from the Society of Technology in Anesthesia. Interpreting Length-of-Stay Benefits of Intrathecal Morphine in Modern Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Pathways. Strengthening the Evidence on Intraoperative Occult Hypoxemia. The Ethics of Human Subjects Research and Quality Improvement in Healthcare in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Analytical Concerns Regarding the Association Between Neuromuscular Blockade and Its Reversal With Postoperative Delirium in Older Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1