Hybrid closed-loop insulin therapy and risk of severe hypoglycaemia and diabetic ketoacidosis in young people (aged 2–20 years) with type 1 diabetes: a population-based study

IF 44 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1016/s2213-8587(24)00284-5
Beate Karges, Joachim Rosenbauer, Anna Stahl-Pehe, Monika Flury, Torben Biester, Martin Tauschmann, Eggert Lilienthal, Johannes Hamann, Angela Galler, Reinhard W Holl
{"title":"Hybrid closed-loop insulin therapy and risk of severe hypoglycaemia and diabetic ketoacidosis in young people (aged 2–20 years) with type 1 diabetes: a population-based study","authors":"Beate Karges, Joachim Rosenbauer, Anna Stahl-Pehe, Monika Flury, Torben Biester, Martin Tauschmann, Eggert Lilienthal, Johannes Hamann, Angela Galler, Reinhard W Holl","doi":"10.1016/s2213-8587(24)00284-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Background</h3>The effect of closed-loop insulin delivery on the risk of acute diabetes complications in people with type 1 diabetes is unclear. We investigated whether the rates of severe hypoglycaemia and diabetic ketoacidosis are lower with hybrid closed-loop insulin therapy compared with sensor-augmented (open-loop) pump therapy in a large cohort of young people.<h3>Methods</h3>In this population-based cohort study, we evaluated young people with type 1 diabetes from 250 diabetes centres in Germany, Austria, Switzerland, and Luxembourg participating in the Diabetes Prospective Follow-up (DPV) initiative. Included participants were aged 2–20 years, with diabetes duration of more than 1 year, and were treated between Jan 1, 2021, and Dec 31, 2023. The primary outcomes were the rates of severe hypoglycaemia and ketoacidosis in people using closed-loop therapy versus open-loop therapy. Key secondary outcomes were differences in HbA<sub>1c</sub> levels, percentage of time in glucose range of 3·9–10·0 mmol/L, and glycaemic variability. To account for relevant confounders, we applied propensity score inverse probability of treatment weighting considering several baseline characteristics.<h3>Findings</h3>13 922 young people (median age 13·2 years [IQR 10·0 to 16·0]; 51% male) in the DPV database met inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. 7088 used closed-loop therapy and 6834 used open-loop therapy, with a median observation time of 1·6 years [IQR 1·1 to 2·4]. Individuals using closed-loop therapy had a higher rate of ketoacidosis (1·74 per 100 patient-years) than those using open-loop therapy (0·96 per 100 patient-years; incidence rate ratio 1·81 [1·37 to 2·40], p&lt;0·0001) and there was no significant difference between groups in the rate of severe hypoglycaemia (5·59 per 100 patient-years <em>vs</em> 6·63 per 100 patient-years; incidence rate ratio 0·84 [95% CI 0·69 to 1·03], p=0·089). Individuals using closed-loop therapy had a lower rate of hypoglycaemic coma (0·62 per 100 patient-years) compared with individuals using open-loop therapy (0·91 per 100 patient-years; incidence rate ratio 0·68 [95% CI 0·48 to 0·97], p=0·034). Those in the closed-loop therapy group also had a lower HbA<sub>1c</sub> level (7·34% <em>vs</em> 7·50%; difference –0·16% [95% CI –0·20 to –0·13], p=0·0007), higher percentage of time in target glucose range of 3·9–10·0 mmol/L (64% <em>vs</em> 52%, difference 12% [10 to 14], p&lt;0·0001), and less glycaemic variability (coefficient of variation 35·4% <em>vs</em> 38·3%; difference –2·9% [–3·3 to –2·5], p&lt;0·0001) than those in the open-loop therapy group. The rate of ketoacidosis was particularly high in young people with HbA<sub>1c</sub> of 8·5% or higher in the closed-loop therapy group (5·25 per 100 patient-years) compared with the open-loop therapy group (1·53 per 100 patient-years; incidence rate ratio 3·43 [95% CI 1·69 to 6·97], p&lt;0·0001).<h3>Interpretation</h3>Hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery has no significant effect on the rate of severe hypoglycaemia, and is associated with an increased risk of diabetic ketoacidosis, but is associated with a reduced risk of hypoglycaemic coma and improved glycaemia. These findings indicate the need for additional educational measures for the use of closed-loop insulin delivery.<h3>Funding</h3>German Center for Diabetes Research, German Diabetes Society, and Robert Koch Institute.","PeriodicalId":48790,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology","volume":"85 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":44.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-8587(24)00284-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The effect of closed-loop insulin delivery on the risk of acute diabetes complications in people with type 1 diabetes is unclear. We investigated whether the rates of severe hypoglycaemia and diabetic ketoacidosis are lower with hybrid closed-loop insulin therapy compared with sensor-augmented (open-loop) pump therapy in a large cohort of young people.

Methods

In this population-based cohort study, we evaluated young people with type 1 diabetes from 250 diabetes centres in Germany, Austria, Switzerland, and Luxembourg participating in the Diabetes Prospective Follow-up (DPV) initiative. Included participants were aged 2–20 years, with diabetes duration of more than 1 year, and were treated between Jan 1, 2021, and Dec 31, 2023. The primary outcomes were the rates of severe hypoglycaemia and ketoacidosis in people using closed-loop therapy versus open-loop therapy. Key secondary outcomes were differences in HbA1c levels, percentage of time in glucose range of 3·9–10·0 mmol/L, and glycaemic variability. To account for relevant confounders, we applied propensity score inverse probability of treatment weighting considering several baseline characteristics.

Findings

13 922 young people (median age 13·2 years [IQR 10·0 to 16·0]; 51% male) in the DPV database met inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. 7088 used closed-loop therapy and 6834 used open-loop therapy, with a median observation time of 1·6 years [IQR 1·1 to 2·4]. Individuals using closed-loop therapy had a higher rate of ketoacidosis (1·74 per 100 patient-years) than those using open-loop therapy (0·96 per 100 patient-years; incidence rate ratio 1·81 [1·37 to 2·40], p<0·0001) and there was no significant difference between groups in the rate of severe hypoglycaemia (5·59 per 100 patient-years vs 6·63 per 100 patient-years; incidence rate ratio 0·84 [95% CI 0·69 to 1·03], p=0·089). Individuals using closed-loop therapy had a lower rate of hypoglycaemic coma (0·62 per 100 patient-years) compared with individuals using open-loop therapy (0·91 per 100 patient-years; incidence rate ratio 0·68 [95% CI 0·48 to 0·97], p=0·034). Those in the closed-loop therapy group also had a lower HbA1c level (7·34% vs 7·50%; difference –0·16% [95% CI –0·20 to –0·13], p=0·0007), higher percentage of time in target glucose range of 3·9–10·0 mmol/L (64% vs 52%, difference 12% [10 to 14], p<0·0001), and less glycaemic variability (coefficient of variation 35·4% vs 38·3%; difference –2·9% [–3·3 to –2·5], p<0·0001) than those in the open-loop therapy group. The rate of ketoacidosis was particularly high in young people with HbA1c of 8·5% or higher in the closed-loop therapy group (5·25 per 100 patient-years) compared with the open-loop therapy group (1·53 per 100 patient-years; incidence rate ratio 3·43 [95% CI 1·69 to 6·97], p<0·0001).

Interpretation

Hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery has no significant effect on the rate of severe hypoglycaemia, and is associated with an increased risk of diabetic ketoacidosis, but is associated with a reduced risk of hypoglycaemic coma and improved glycaemia. These findings indicate the need for additional educational measures for the use of closed-loop insulin delivery.

Funding

German Center for Diabetes Research, German Diabetes Society, and Robert Koch Institute.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
混合闭环胰岛素治疗和1型糖尿病年轻人(2-20岁)严重低血糖和糖尿病酮症酸中毒的风险:一项基于人群的研究
背景闭环胰岛素给药对 1 型糖尿病患者急性糖尿病并发症风险的影响尚不清楚。在这项基于人群的队列研究中,我们对参与糖尿病前瞻性随访(DPV)计划的德国、奥地利、瑞士和卢森堡 250 家糖尿病中心的 1 型糖尿病患者进行了评估。研究对象的年龄为 2-20 岁,糖尿病病程超过 1 年,治疗时间为 2021 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 12 月 31 日。主要结果是使用闭环疗法与开环疗法的患者发生严重低血糖和酮症酸中毒的比率。主要次要结果是 HbA1c 水平的差异、血糖在 3-9-10-0 mmol/L 范围内的时间百分比以及血糖变异性。为了考虑相关的混杂因素,我们采用了倾向得分反概率治疗加权法,并考虑了几个基线特征。研究结果13 DPV数据库中的922名年轻人(中位年龄13-2岁[IQR 10-0至16-0];51%为男性)符合纳入标准并被纳入分析。其中 7088 人使用闭环疗法,6834 人使用开环疗法,观察时间中位数为 1-6 年 [IQR 1-1 到 2-4]。使用闭环疗法的患者发生酮症酸中毒的比例(每 100 名患者年 1-74 例)高于使用开环疗法的患者(每 100 名患者年 0-96 例;发生率比 1-81 [1-37 至 2-40],p<0-0001),而严重低血糖的发生率组间无显著差异(每 100 名患者年 5-59 例 vs 每 100 名患者年 6-63 例;发生率比 0-84 [95% CI 0-69 至 1-03],p=0-089)。与使用开环疗法的患者相比,使用闭环疗法的患者发生低血糖昏迷的比例较低(0-62/100 患者-年)(0-91/100 患者-年;发病率比 0-68 [95% CI 0-48 至 0-97],p=0-034)。闭环疗法组患者的 HbA1c 水平也较低(7-34% vs 7-50%;差异 -0-16% [95% CI -0-20 to -0-13],p=0-0007),目标血糖范围为 3-9-10-0 mmol/L 的时间百分比较高(64% vs 52%,差异 12% [10 to 14],p<;0-0001),血糖变异性(变异系数 35-4% vs 38-3%;差异 -2-9% [-3-3 to -2-5],p<0-0001)也低于开环治疗组。在 HbA1c 为 8-5% 或更高的年轻人中,闭环疗法组的酮症酸中毒发生率尤其高(每 100 名患者年 5-25 例),而开环疗法组为每 100 名患者年 1-53 例;发生率比为 3-43 [95% CI 1-69 至 6-97],p<0-0001)。释义混合闭环胰岛素给药对严重低血糖症的发生率无明显影响,且与糖尿病酮症酸中毒风险增加有关,但与低血糖昏迷风险降低和血糖改善有关。这些研究结果表明,在使用闭环胰岛素给药时需要采取更多的教育措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology
The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
61.50
自引率
1.60%
发文量
371
期刊介绍: The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, an independent journal with a global perspective and strong clinical focus, features original clinical research, expert reviews, news, and opinion pieces in each monthly issue. Covering topics like diabetes, obesity, nutrition, and more, the journal provides insights into clinical advances and practice-changing research worldwide. It welcomes original research advocating change or shedding light on clinical practice, as well as informative reviews on related topics, especially those with global health importance and relevance to low-income and middle-income countries. The journal publishes various content types, including Articles, Reviews, Comments, Correspondence, Health Policy, and Personal Views, along with Series and Commissions aiming to drive positive change in clinical practice and health policy in diabetes and endocrinology.
期刊最新文献
Trends in thyroid cancer incidence and overdiagnosis in the USA Trends in incidence, metastasis, and mortality from thyroid cancer in the USA from 1975 to 2019: a population-based study of age, period, and cohort effects Correction to Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2025; 13: 119–33 Automated insulin delivery postpartum: insights from the AiDAPT study extension Automated insulin delivery during the first 6 months postpartum (AiDAPT): a prespecified extension study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1