Serum Progesterone Level on the Day of Embryo Transfer Is Not a Reliable Predictor for Frozen–Thawed Embryo Transfer Outcomes With Euploid Blastocyst Transfer: A Retrospective Cohort Study

IF 4.3 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Pub Date : 2024-12-17 DOI:10.1111/1471-0528.18045
Wenjun Chen, Yiyao Xu, Xinyan Liu, Jiafu Pan, Bing Cai, Canquan Zhou, Yanwen Xu, Fang Gu
{"title":"Serum Progesterone Level on the Day of Embryo Transfer Is Not a Reliable Predictor for Frozen–Thawed Embryo Transfer Outcomes With Euploid Blastocyst Transfer: A Retrospective Cohort Study","authors":"Wenjun Chen,&nbsp;Yiyao Xu,&nbsp;Xinyan Liu,&nbsp;Jiafu Pan,&nbsp;Bing Cai,&nbsp;Canquan Zhou,&nbsp;Yanwen Xu,&nbsp;Fang Gu","doi":"10.1111/1471-0528.18045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To investigate whether serum progesterone (P4) levels on embryo transfer (ET) day correlate with the likelihood of live birth in artificial frozen–thawed transfer cycles using intramuscular progesterone.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Retrospective cohort study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>University-affiliated hospital.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Population</h3>\n \n <p>Patients undergoing single euploid blastocyst transfer after preimplantation genetic testing.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Live birth rate (LBR) was calculated in each percentile of serum P4 to detect a threshold associated with an increased probability of LB. The association between serum P4 and pregnancy outcomes was evaluated using multivariable logistic regression analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Outcome Measures</h3>\n \n <p>LBR was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and early pregnancy loss (EPL) rate.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In total, 761 patients were included, and the overall LBR was 55.72%. For LBR, each percentile group of serum P4 did not significantly differ. The distributions of P4 were comparable between the LB and non-LB groups, with an average of 12.62 ± 4.05 and 12.84 ± 4.39 ng/mL, respectively. The multivariate analysis revealed that serum P4 did not affect the LBR, whereas the day of the blastocyst (D5 vs. D6: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.52–3.03) and embryo quality (good vs. viable embryo: aOR 1.88, 95% CI 1.37–2.58) were independently associated with LBR. Similarly, serum P4 was not associated with CPR and EPL rates.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Serum P4 levels on ET day do not predict LBR in artificial cycles with intramuscular progesterone.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50729,"journal":{"name":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"132 S2","pages":"53-61"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.18045","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To investigate whether serum progesterone (P4) levels on embryo transfer (ET) day correlate with the likelihood of live birth in artificial frozen–thawed transfer cycles using intramuscular progesterone.

Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Setting

University-affiliated hospital.

Population

Patients undergoing single euploid blastocyst transfer after preimplantation genetic testing.

Methods

Live birth rate (LBR) was calculated in each percentile of serum P4 to detect a threshold associated with an increased probability of LB. The association between serum P4 and pregnancy outcomes was evaluated using multivariable logistic regression analysis.

Main Outcome Measures

LBR was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and early pregnancy loss (EPL) rate.

Results

In total, 761 patients were included, and the overall LBR was 55.72%. For LBR, each percentile group of serum P4 did not significantly differ. The distributions of P4 were comparable between the LB and non-LB groups, with an average of 12.62 ± 4.05 and 12.84 ± 4.39 ng/mL, respectively. The multivariate analysis revealed that serum P4 did not affect the LBR, whereas the day of the blastocyst (D5 vs. D6: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.52–3.03) and embryo quality (good vs. viable embryo: aOR 1.88, 95% CI 1.37–2.58) were independently associated with LBR. Similarly, serum P4 was not associated with CPR and EPL rates.

Conclusions

Serum P4 levels on ET day do not predict LBR in artificial cycles with intramuscular progesterone.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胚胎移植当天血清孕酮水平不是整倍体囊胚移植冻融胚胎移植结果的可靠预测指标:一项回顾性队列研究
研究在使用肌肉注射孕酮的人工冻融移植周期中,胚胎移植(ET)日的血清孕酮(P4)水平是否与活产的可能性相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
5.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BJOG is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). The Journal publishes original, peer-reviewed work in all areas of obstetrics and gynaecology, including contraception, urogynaecology, fertility, oncology and clinical practice. Its aim is to publish the highest quality medical research in women''s health, worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Chemicals in menstrual products: Highlighting the need for further research into the effects of chemical exposure. Predicting platinum resistance and poor prognosis in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Menopausal hormonal therapy and cardiovascular health. Author Reply. Author Reply.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1