The Efficacy and Safety of Botulinum Toxin Type A in Prevention of Hypertrophic Scars After Epicanthoplasty: A Split-Face Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1007/s00266-024-04498-w
Dandan Liu, Yanting Ou, Lin Luo, Mengfan Wu, Yihan Zhang, Luotai Chen, Zhuolin Liu, Tingyin Lin, Xiangwen Xu, Yongyan Cui
{"title":"The Efficacy and Safety of Botulinum Toxin Type A in Prevention of Hypertrophic Scars After Epicanthoplasty: A Split-Face Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Dandan Liu, Yanting Ou, Lin Luo, Mengfan Wu, Yihan Zhang, Luotai Chen, Zhuolin Liu, Tingyin Lin, Xiangwen Xu, Yongyan Cui","doi":"10.1007/s00266-024-04498-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Timely intervention can improve the aesthetic outcome of surgical scars, and botulinum toxin type A (BTXA) has demonstrated its potential as an effective treatment. However, conclusive scientific evidence is needed to definitively confirm the specific efficacy of BTXA following epicanthoplasty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 21 patients who underwent epicanthoplasty were enrolled. Either BTXA or normal saline was randomly injected into the left or right epicanthus immediately after epicanthoplasty. The efficacy of scar prevention was assessed at a 1-month and 6-month follow-up visit using various assessment scales, and scar widths were also measured. The safety assessment included evaluating the complications and adverse effects after injections.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Totally, 20 patients completed the entire follow-up period. At 6-month follow-up, significant improvements were noted (P<0.05) in the treatment group compared to the control group across all evaluated metrics: the Modified Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (total scores: 6.73±1.26 vs 5.75±1.60), Observer Scar Assessment Scale (total scores: 6.35±5.93 vs 8.55±5.65), Patient Scar Assessment Scale (color scores: 1.10±1.17 vs 1.85±1.69), Visual Analog Scale (total scores: 8.48±1.24 vs 7.94±1.37), and the average scar widths (0.37±0.18mm vs 0.68±0.42mm). No adverse effects were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BTXA can effectively prevent scar hyperplasia after epicanthoplasty, especially in improving scar pigmentation, width, and softness.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence ii: </strong>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .</p>","PeriodicalId":7609,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-04498-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Timely intervention can improve the aesthetic outcome of surgical scars, and botulinum toxin type A (BTXA) has demonstrated its potential as an effective treatment. However, conclusive scientific evidence is needed to definitively confirm the specific efficacy of BTXA following epicanthoplasty.

Methods: A total of 21 patients who underwent epicanthoplasty were enrolled. Either BTXA or normal saline was randomly injected into the left or right epicanthus immediately after epicanthoplasty. The efficacy of scar prevention was assessed at a 1-month and 6-month follow-up visit using various assessment scales, and scar widths were also measured. The safety assessment included evaluating the complications and adverse effects after injections.

Results: Totally, 20 patients completed the entire follow-up period. At 6-month follow-up, significant improvements were noted (P<0.05) in the treatment group compared to the control group across all evaluated metrics: the Modified Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (total scores: 6.73±1.26 vs 5.75±1.60), Observer Scar Assessment Scale (total scores: 6.35±5.93 vs 8.55±5.65), Patient Scar Assessment Scale (color scores: 1.10±1.17 vs 1.85±1.69), Visual Analog Scale (total scores: 8.48±1.24 vs 7.94±1.37), and the average scar widths (0.37±0.18mm vs 0.68±0.42mm). No adverse effects were observed.

Conclusions: BTXA can effectively prevent scar hyperplasia after epicanthoplasty, especially in improving scar pigmentation, width, and softness.

Level of evidence ii: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A 型肉毒杆菌毒素预防外眦成形术后肥厚性瘢痕的有效性和安全性:分面双盲随机对照试验》。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
479
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is a publication of the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and the official journal of the European Association of Societies of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (EASAPS), Società Italiana di Chirurgia Plastica Ricostruttiva ed Estetica (SICPRE), Vereinigung der Deutschen Aesthetisch Plastischen Chirurgen (VDAPC), the Romanian Aesthetic Surgery Society (RASS), Asociación Española de Cirugía Estética Plástica (AECEP), La Sociedad Argentina de Cirugía Plástica, Estética y Reparadora (SACPER), the Rhinoplasty Society of Europe (RSE), the Iranian Society of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgeons (ISPAS), the Singapore Association of Plastic Surgeons (SAPS), the Australasian Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (ASAPS), the Egyptian Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (ESPRS), and the Sociedad Chilena de Cirugía Plástica, Reconstructiva y Estética (SCCP). Aesthetic Plastic Surgery provides a forum for original articles advancing the art of aesthetic plastic surgery. Many describe surgical craftsmanship; others deal with complications in surgical procedures and methods by which to treat or avoid them. Coverage includes "second thoughts" on established techniques, which might be abandoned, modified, or improved. Also included are case histories; improvements in surgical instruments, pharmaceuticals, and operating room equipment; and discussions of problems such as the role of psychosocial factors in the doctor-patient and the patient-public interrelationships. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is covered in Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, SciSearch, Research Alert, Index Medicus-Medline, and Excerpta Medica/Embase.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Facial Symmetry in Congenital Unilateral Lower Lip Palsy Patients with Depressor Labii Inferioris Muscle Resection. Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy in Aesthetic Medicine and Anti-Aging: A Systematic Review. Post Hoc Non-inferiority Analysis of the Efficacy of Poly-L-Lactic Acid Filler (Gana V versus Sculptra) Injection for Correction of the Nasolabial Fold: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Split-Face Controlled Trial. The Mediating Roles of Objectified Body Consciousness About Acceptance of Cosmetic Surgery Among International Students in China. Benefit of the Omental Flap in Breast Reconstruction for Oncoplastic Treatment: A Systematic Review and Single-Arm Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1