Prehabilitation-A Simple Approach for Complex Patients: The Results of a Single-Center Study on Prehabilitation in Patients with Ovarian Cancer Before Cytoreductive Surgery.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Cancers Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.3390/cancers16234032
Marcin Adam Zębalski, Aleksandra Krzywon, Krzysztof Nowosielski
{"title":"Prehabilitation-A Simple Approach for Complex Patients: The Results of a Single-Center Study on Prehabilitation in Patients with Ovarian Cancer Before Cytoreductive Surgery.","authors":"Marcin Adam Zębalski, Aleksandra Krzywon, Krzysztof Nowosielski","doi":"10.3390/cancers16234032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Prehabilitation is a low-cost, safe procedure with no side effects, and it may have a positive impact on postoperative outcomes. However, it is not widely implemented. Our study aimed to assess the impact of prehabilitation on postoperative outcomes in patients with ovarian cancer within the field of gynecological oncology. <b>Methods</b>: We analyzed 110 patients with ovarian cancer who participated in a prehabilitation program before cytoreductive surgery. Based on the results of a 6-min walk test (6MWT), patients were divided into two groups: Group A (patients who improved their 6MWT results) and Group B (patients who did not improve their 6MWT results). <b>Results</b>: Patients in Group A demonstrated better postoperative outcomes. The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in Group A compared to Group B (median 7 [5, 9] vs. 9 [6, 17], <i>p</i> = 0.032). Group A also had a lower overall number of complications and also fewer complications, as summarized by the Clavien-Dindo classification, compared to Group B. <b>Conclusions</b>: Patient adherence to prehabilitation recommendations was adequate. Prehabilitation was associated with improved postoperative outcomes, including shorter hospital stays and fewer complications. These benefits were more pronounced with higher patient compliance with the prehabilitation program and improvements were recorded in preoperative physical capacity.</p>","PeriodicalId":9681,"journal":{"name":"Cancers","volume":"16 23","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11640205/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancers","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16234032","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Prehabilitation is a low-cost, safe procedure with no side effects, and it may have a positive impact on postoperative outcomes. However, it is not widely implemented. Our study aimed to assess the impact of prehabilitation on postoperative outcomes in patients with ovarian cancer within the field of gynecological oncology. Methods: We analyzed 110 patients with ovarian cancer who participated in a prehabilitation program before cytoreductive surgery. Based on the results of a 6-min walk test (6MWT), patients were divided into two groups: Group A (patients who improved their 6MWT results) and Group B (patients who did not improve their 6MWT results). Results: Patients in Group A demonstrated better postoperative outcomes. The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in Group A compared to Group B (median 7 [5, 9] vs. 9 [6, 17], p = 0.032). Group A also had a lower overall number of complications and also fewer complications, as summarized by the Clavien-Dindo classification, compared to Group B. Conclusions: Patient adherence to prehabilitation recommendations was adequate. Prehabilitation was associated with improved postoperative outcomes, including shorter hospital stays and fewer complications. These benefits were more pronounced with higher patient compliance with the prehabilitation program and improvements were recorded in preoperative physical capacity.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预康复--复杂患者的简单方法:卵巢癌患者细胞切除手术前康复治疗的单中心研究结果。
背景/目的:预康复是一种低成本、安全、无副作用的手术,可能对术后预后有积极影响。然而,它并没有得到广泛的实施。我们的研究旨在评估妇科肿瘤领域卵巢癌患者术后康复的影响。方法:我们分析了110例在细胞减少手术前参加康复计划的卵巢癌患者。根据6分钟步行测试(6MWT)的结果,将患者分为两组:a组(6MWT结果改善的患者)和B组(6MWT结果没有改善的患者)。结果:A组患者术后预后较好。A组住院时间明显短于B组(中位数为7[5,9]对9 [6,17],p = 0.032)。根据Clavien-Dindo分类,与b组相比,A组的并发症总数更低,并发症也更少。结论:患者对康复建议的依从性足够。预适应与术后预后改善相关,包括住院时间缩短和并发症减少。这些益处随着患者对康复计划的更高依从性和术前身体能力的改善而更加明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cancers
Cancers Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
9.60%
发文量
5371
审稿时长
18.07 days
期刊介绍: Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal on oncology. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
期刊最新文献
RETRACTED: Wang et al. HSP70-eIF4G Interaction Promotes Protein Synthesis and Cell Proliferation in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancers 2020, 12, 3410. RETRACTED: Sharad et al. Analysis of PMEPA1 Isoforms (a and b) as Selective Inhibitors of Androgen and TGF-β Signaling Reveals Distinct Biological and Prognostic Features in Prostate Cancer. Cancers 2019, 11, 1995. Liquid Biopsy and Molecular Biomarkers in Mucinous Appendiceal and Colorectal Tumors: Current Evidence and Unmet Challenges in Precision Oncology. Antigen Remodeling in Colorectal Cancer: How Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy Enhance Immunotherapy Responsiveness. Circulating ERVFRD-1 and MFSD2A Are Associated with Immunotherapy Response in Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1