Does the time between doses in an unintentional double dose bupropion exposure affect the incidence of adverse effects? A retrospective cohort study.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 TOXICOLOGY Clinical Toxicology Pub Date : 2024-12-17 DOI:10.1080/15563650.2024.2439019
Michael Keenan, Precious Alabi, Ahmed Alsakha, Jeanna Marraffa, Susan Wojcik, Sarah Burke
{"title":"Does the time between doses in an unintentional double dose bupropion exposure affect the incidence of adverse effects? A retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Michael Keenan, Precious Alabi, Ahmed Alsakha, Jeanna Marraffa, Susan Wojcik, Sarah Burke","doi":"10.1080/15563650.2024.2439019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Unintentional therapeutic errors with bupropion are common. The impact of the timing of the second dose in a double dose exposure on adverse effects is not well studied. This study aims to compare adverse effects between double doses separated by <720 min and ≥720 min.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of unintentional double dose bupropion ingestions in patients reported to a regional poison center between January 2018 and December 2022. Patients were included if the double dose was their own medication, unintentional, and a single substance exposure. Data collected included age, gender, bupropion formulation, prescribed home dose, dosing error details, time between doses, caller site, referral to the emergency department, patient observation at healthcare facilities, clinical effects, and outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 663 cases screened, 294 met inclusion criteria. The majority involved extended-release preparations (69.0%). Seventy-four were observed in a healthcare facility and monitored for 24 h from initial dose. The incidence of seizures was 5.3%, including one case not observed for a full 24 h. There was no significant difference in the incidence of seizures (2.7% versus 7.7%), tachycardia (27.0% versus 30.8%), hypertension (18.9% versus 38.5%) other signs/symptoms (27.0% versus 23.1%), or any signs/symptoms (48.6% versus 61.5%) between double doses of extended release bupropion separated by <720 min and those separated by ≥720 min, respectively.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In patients with double dose exposures to extended-release bupropion, it does not appear that the timing of the second dose can be used to risk-stratify patients. Our data are limited by sample size.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, the time between double doses of bupropion did not affect the incidence of seizure, tachycardia, hypertension, other signs/symptoms, or any signs/symptoms. Larger, prospective studies investigating this difference would strengthen our understanding and management of these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10430,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15563650.2024.2439019","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Unintentional therapeutic errors with bupropion are common. The impact of the timing of the second dose in a double dose exposure on adverse effects is not well studied. This study aims to compare adverse effects between double doses separated by <720 min and ≥720 min.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of unintentional double dose bupropion ingestions in patients reported to a regional poison center between January 2018 and December 2022. Patients were included if the double dose was their own medication, unintentional, and a single substance exposure. Data collected included age, gender, bupropion formulation, prescribed home dose, dosing error details, time between doses, caller site, referral to the emergency department, patient observation at healthcare facilities, clinical effects, and outcome.

Results: Among 663 cases screened, 294 met inclusion criteria. The majority involved extended-release preparations (69.0%). Seventy-four were observed in a healthcare facility and monitored for 24 h from initial dose. The incidence of seizures was 5.3%, including one case not observed for a full 24 h. There was no significant difference in the incidence of seizures (2.7% versus 7.7%), tachycardia (27.0% versus 30.8%), hypertension (18.9% versus 38.5%) other signs/symptoms (27.0% versus 23.1%), or any signs/symptoms (48.6% versus 61.5%) between double doses of extended release bupropion separated by <720 min and those separated by ≥720 min, respectively.

Discussion: In patients with double dose exposures to extended-release bupropion, it does not appear that the timing of the second dose can be used to risk-stratify patients. Our data are limited by sample size.

Conclusion: In this study, the time between double doses of bupropion did not affect the incidence of seizure, tachycardia, hypertension, other signs/symptoms, or any signs/symptoms. Larger, prospective studies investigating this difference would strengthen our understanding and management of these patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
意外双剂量安非他酮暴露的时间间隔是否会影响不良反应的发生率?回顾性队列研究。
安非他酮的意外治疗错误是常见的。在双剂量照射中,第二剂量的时间对不良反应的影响尚未得到很好的研究。这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究了2018年1月至2022年12月期间向地区中毒中心报告的患者意外摄入双剂量安非他酮的不良反应。如果双重剂量是他们自己的药物,无意的,并且是单一物质暴露,则纳入患者。收集的数据包括年龄、性别、安非他酮配方、处方家庭剂量、给药错误细节、给药间隔时间、就诊地点、转诊到急诊科、患者在医疗机构的观察、临床效果和结局。结果:663例患者中,294例符合纳入标准。其中大部分为缓释制剂(69.0%)。74人在卫生保健机构观察,并从初始剂量开始监测24小时。癫痫发作的发生率为5.3%,其中一例24小时未观察到。在两次剂量安非他酮缓释剂治疗中,癫痫发作(2.7% vs . 7.7%)、心动过速(27.0% vs . 30.8%)、高血压(18.9% vs . 38.5%)、其他体征/症状(27.0% vs . 23.1%)或任何体征/症状(48.6% vs . 61.5%)的发生率没有显著差异。我们的数据受样本量的限制。结论:在本研究中,两倍剂量安非他酮的间隔时间不影响癫痫发作、心动过速、高血压、其他体征/症状或任何体征/症状的发生率。更大规模的前瞻性研究调查这种差异将加强我们对这些患者的理解和管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Toxicology
Clinical Toxicology 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
12.10%
发文量
148
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: clinical Toxicology publishes peer-reviewed scientific research and clinical advances in clinical toxicology. The journal reflects the professional concerns and best scientific judgment of its sponsors, the American Academy of Clinical Toxicology, the European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists, the American Association of Poison Control Centers and the Asia Pacific Association of Medical Toxicology and, as such, is the leading international journal in the specialty.
期刊最新文献
Barriers to the performance of timely hemodialysis when recommended by one United States poison center: a retrospective review. Comparison of children receiving extracorporeal treatments for poisoning at United States centers with and without a pediatric nephrologist. A pregnant woman with diquat poisoning leading to miscarriage and pontine haematoma. A case series of ibogaine toxicity reported to the United Kingdom National Poisons Information Service (NPIS) over a 10-year period. Sotalol poisoning and its unique treatment considerations compared with traditional therapies for beta-adrenoceptor blocking drug poisoning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1