Does the time between doses in an unintentional double dose bupropion exposure affect the incidence of adverse effects? A retrospective cohort study.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 TOXICOLOGY Clinical Toxicology Pub Date : 2024-12-17 DOI:10.1080/15563650.2024.2439019
Michael Keenan, Precious Alabi, Ahmed Alsakha, Jeanna Marraffa, Susan Wojcik, Sarah Burke
{"title":"Does the time between doses in an unintentional double dose bupropion exposure affect the incidence of adverse effects? A retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Michael Keenan, Precious Alabi, Ahmed Alsakha, Jeanna Marraffa, Susan Wojcik, Sarah Burke","doi":"10.1080/15563650.2024.2439019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Unintentional therapeutic errors with bupropion are common. The impact of the timing of the second dose in a double dose exposure on adverse effects is not well studied. This study aims to compare adverse effects between double doses separated by <720 min and ≥720 min.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of unintentional double dose bupropion ingestions in patients reported to a regional poison center between January 2018 and December 2022. Patients were included if the double dose was their own medication, unintentional, and a single substance exposure. Data collected included age, gender, bupropion formulation, prescribed home dose, dosing error details, time between doses, caller site, referral to the emergency department, patient observation at healthcare facilities, clinical effects, and outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 663 cases screened, 294 met inclusion criteria. The majority involved extended-release preparations (69.0%). Seventy-four were observed in a healthcare facility and monitored for 24 h from initial dose. The incidence of seizures was 5.3%, including one case not observed for a full 24 h. There was no significant difference in the incidence of seizures (2.7% versus 7.7%), tachycardia (27.0% versus 30.8%), hypertension (18.9% versus 38.5%) other signs/symptoms (27.0% versus 23.1%), or any signs/symptoms (48.6% versus 61.5%) between double doses of extended release bupropion separated by <720 min and those separated by ≥720 min, respectively.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In patients with double dose exposures to extended-release bupropion, it does not appear that the timing of the second dose can be used to risk-stratify patients. Our data are limited by sample size.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, the time between double doses of bupropion did not affect the incidence of seizure, tachycardia, hypertension, other signs/symptoms, or any signs/symptoms. Larger, prospective studies investigating this difference would strengthen our understanding and management of these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10430,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15563650.2024.2439019","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Unintentional therapeutic errors with bupropion are common. The impact of the timing of the second dose in a double dose exposure on adverse effects is not well studied. This study aims to compare adverse effects between double doses separated by <720 min and ≥720 min.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of unintentional double dose bupropion ingestions in patients reported to a regional poison center between January 2018 and December 2022. Patients were included if the double dose was their own medication, unintentional, and a single substance exposure. Data collected included age, gender, bupropion formulation, prescribed home dose, dosing error details, time between doses, caller site, referral to the emergency department, patient observation at healthcare facilities, clinical effects, and outcome.

Results: Among 663 cases screened, 294 met inclusion criteria. The majority involved extended-release preparations (69.0%). Seventy-four were observed in a healthcare facility and monitored for 24 h from initial dose. The incidence of seizures was 5.3%, including one case not observed for a full 24 h. There was no significant difference in the incidence of seizures (2.7% versus 7.7%), tachycardia (27.0% versus 30.8%), hypertension (18.9% versus 38.5%) other signs/symptoms (27.0% versus 23.1%), or any signs/symptoms (48.6% versus 61.5%) between double doses of extended release bupropion separated by <720 min and those separated by ≥720 min, respectively.

Discussion: In patients with double dose exposures to extended-release bupropion, it does not appear that the timing of the second dose can be used to risk-stratify patients. Our data are limited by sample size.

Conclusion: In this study, the time between double doses of bupropion did not affect the incidence of seizure, tachycardia, hypertension, other signs/symptoms, or any signs/symptoms. Larger, prospective studies investigating this difference would strengthen our understanding and management of these patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Toxicology
Clinical Toxicology 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
12.10%
发文量
148
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: clinical Toxicology publishes peer-reviewed scientific research and clinical advances in clinical toxicology. The journal reflects the professional concerns and best scientific judgment of its sponsors, the American Academy of Clinical Toxicology, the European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists, the American Association of Poison Control Centers and the Asia Pacific Association of Medical Toxicology and, as such, is the leading international journal in the specialty.
期刊最新文献
Authors reply to comment on Hayman et al. "elevated osmol gaps in patients with alcoholic ketoacidosis". Abnormalities in brain magnetic resonance imaging associated with vigabatrin therapy in an infant with infantile epileptic spasms syndrome. Why so blue? A novel presentation of methaemoglobinaemia secondary to an inhaled occupational nitric acid exposure. Does the time between doses in an unintentional double dose bupropion exposure affect the incidence of adverse effects? A retrospective cohort study. Refractory methemoglobinemia after ingestion of N,N-dimethyl-p-toluidine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1