Post-CAR T-Cell Therapy Failure Metabolic Parameters Predict Survival and Response in Large B-Cell Lymphoma

IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Hematological Oncology Pub Date : 2024-12-17 DOI:10.1002/hon.70025
Hazim S. Ababneh, Matthew J. Frigault, Andrea K. Ng, Chirayu G. Patel
{"title":"Post-CAR T-Cell Therapy Failure Metabolic Parameters Predict Survival and Response in Large B-Cell Lymphoma","authors":"Hazim S. Ababneh,&nbsp;Matthew J. Frigault,&nbsp;Andrea K. Ng,&nbsp;Chirayu G. Patel","doi":"10.1002/hon.70025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) parameters have shown a significant prognostic role in relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) patients undergoing CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. While a substantial body of evidence exists on the prognostic value of PET/CT parameters in peri-CAR T setting, data available on the prognostic value of PET/CT parameters following CAR T-cell therapy failure is lacking. Therefore, we sought to analyze the PET/CT scans of LBCL patients who experienced post-CAR T relapsed/progressive disease and subsequently received salvage therapies. Thirty-three LBCL patients who had PET-CT scans done demonstrating post-CAR T failure and then received salvage therapies [as a first salvage modality: RT alone, nine patients; combined modality therapy (CMT), seven patients; systemic therapy (ST) alone, 17 patients] were analyzed. The median follow-up after CAR T-cell infusion was 11.7 months [interquartile range (IQR): 5.1–24.4 months], and the median follow-up after post-CAR T salvage therapy was 7.3 months (IQR: 2.7–19.1 months). The median timeframe for the PET scan showing post-CAR T failure was 2.4 months (IQR: 0.96–5.0 months). On univariable analysis from salvage therapy start date, high metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were associated with inferior overall survival (OS) (Hazard ratio –HR = 8.4, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001; HR = 3.2, <i>p</i> = 0.01, respectively). High MTV was associated with a non-significant trend of inferior progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 3.5, <i>p</i> = 0.09). High maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was not associated with inferior OS or inferior PFS. On multivariable analysis from salvage therapy start date, high MTV (HR = 4.6, 95% CI: 1.5–14.3, <i>p</i> = 0.009) was identified to be an independent prognostic factor for inferior OS. High International Prognostic Index (IPI) (≥ 3) at the time of salvage therapy (HR = 2.5, 95% CI: 1.1–5.6, <i>p</i> = 0.02) was significantly associated with inferior PFS. Our study shows that semiquantitative PET/CT metrics, especially MTV, are significant prognostic indicators of overall survival in this highly refractory population after CAR T-cell therapy failure, potentially refining prognostic and treatment approaches beyond conventional parameters like IPI.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12882,"journal":{"name":"Hematological Oncology","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hematological Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hon.70025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) parameters have shown a significant prognostic role in relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) patients undergoing CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. While a substantial body of evidence exists on the prognostic value of PET/CT parameters in peri-CAR T setting, data available on the prognostic value of PET/CT parameters following CAR T-cell therapy failure is lacking. Therefore, we sought to analyze the PET/CT scans of LBCL patients who experienced post-CAR T relapsed/progressive disease and subsequently received salvage therapies. Thirty-three LBCL patients who had PET-CT scans done demonstrating post-CAR T failure and then received salvage therapies [as a first salvage modality: RT alone, nine patients; combined modality therapy (CMT), seven patients; systemic therapy (ST) alone, 17 patients] were analyzed. The median follow-up after CAR T-cell infusion was 11.7 months [interquartile range (IQR): 5.1–24.4 months], and the median follow-up after post-CAR T salvage therapy was 7.3 months (IQR: 2.7–19.1 months). The median timeframe for the PET scan showing post-CAR T failure was 2.4 months (IQR: 0.96–5.0 months). On univariable analysis from salvage therapy start date, high metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were associated with inferior overall survival (OS) (Hazard ratio –HR = 8.4, p < 0.0001; HR = 3.2, p = 0.01, respectively). High MTV was associated with a non-significant trend of inferior progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 3.5, p = 0.09). High maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was not associated with inferior OS or inferior PFS. On multivariable analysis from salvage therapy start date, high MTV (HR = 4.6, 95% CI: 1.5–14.3, p = 0.009) was identified to be an independent prognostic factor for inferior OS. High International Prognostic Index (IPI) (≥ 3) at the time of salvage therapy (HR = 2.5, 95% CI: 1.1–5.6, p = 0.02) was significantly associated with inferior PFS. Our study shows that semiquantitative PET/CT metrics, especially MTV, are significant prognostic indicators of overall survival in this highly refractory population after CAR T-cell therapy failure, potentially refining prognostic and treatment approaches beyond conventional parameters like IPI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hematological Oncology
Hematological Oncology 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
147
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Hematological Oncology considers for publication articles dealing with experimental and clinical aspects of neoplastic diseases of the hemopoietic and lymphoid systems and relevant related matters. Translational studies applying basic science to clinical issues are particularly welcomed. Manuscripts dealing with the following areas are encouraged: -Clinical practice and management of hematological neoplasia, including: acute and chronic leukemias, malignant lymphomas, myeloproliferative disorders -Diagnostic investigations, including imaging and laboratory assays -Epidemiology, pathology and pathobiology of hematological neoplasia of hematological diseases -Therapeutic issues including Phase 1, 2 or 3 trials as well as allogeneic and autologous stem cell transplantation studies -Aspects of the cell biology, molecular biology, molecular genetics and cytogenetics of normal or diseased hematopoeisis and lymphopoiesis, including stem cells and cytokines and other regulatory systems. Concise, topical review material is welcomed, especially if it makes new concepts and ideas accessible to a wider community. Proposals for review material may be discussed with the Editor-in-Chief. Collections of case material and case reports will be considered only if they have broader scientific or clinical relevance.
期刊最新文献
Post-CAR T-Cell Therapy Failure Metabolic Parameters Predict Survival and Response in Large B-Cell Lymphoma Combining Total Metabolic Tumor Volume With Beta-2-Microglobulin Levels Predicts Outcomes in High-Burden Follicular Lymphoma Patients Long-Term Outcomes of Reduced-Toxicity Conditioning Using 8-Gray Total Body Irradiation, Fludarabine, and Cyclophosphamide in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults With Hematological Malignancies Ceiling Effect of International Myeloma Working Group Frailty Score in Real-World Population of Older Adults With Cancer Hospital Palliative Care Team Consultations in Different Subgroups of Hematologic Malignancies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1