Psychosocial Impact of Quarantines: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Healthcare Pub Date : 2024-11-30 DOI:10.3390/healthcare12232409
Catarina Fabiola González González, Marcelo Navarro, Fabiola María Del Carmen Helbig Soto, Braulio Henrique Magnani Branco, Daniela Avello, Florencia Carmine, Nicolás Márquez Álvarez, Cristian Sandoval, Síbila Floriano Landim, Marcelo Leiva-Bianch
{"title":"Psychosocial Impact of Quarantines: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Catarina Fabiola González González, Marcelo Navarro, Fabiola María Del Carmen Helbig Soto, Braulio Henrique Magnani Branco, Daniela Avello, Florencia Carmine, Nicolás Márquez Álvarez, Cristian Sandoval, Síbila Floriano Landim, Marcelo Leiva-Bianch","doi":"10.3390/healthcare12232409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Quarantine is one of the most effective strategies to control outbreaks of communicable diseases. Individuals under isolation or quarantine experience both physical and mental effects. Therefore, given its widespread implementation around the world, it is pertinent to analyze this effect on physical and mental health. The psychosocial impact model, which divides four dimensions into two main points, exposure or protection and positive or negative responses, was used to analyze the psychosocial impact of quarantine. <b>Objectives</b>: The present study aimed to investigate the psychosocial impact of people exposed to or protected from quarantine. <b>Methods</b>: We conducted a search for primary articles in the Web of Science and Scopus databases, and after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, we meta-analyzed five of them. <b>Results</b>: Quarantined individuals were more likely to experience anxiety (<i>K</i> = 4; <i>OR</i> = 2.62) and depressive symptoms (<i>K</i> = 6; <i>OR</i> = 1.61) compared to those who did not undergo quarantine. Researchers discuss a twofold increase in the probability of anxiety or depression among those in quarantine. As a result, advancing interventions that reduce this impact is critical for both health and the global economy. <b>Conclusions</b>: In terms of economic variables, the non-moderation of GDP per capita and the moderation of the GINI index stand out, demonstrating that countries must move toward policies that promote the reconstruction of more resilient and inclusive societies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12977,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare","volume":"12 23","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12232409","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Quarantine is one of the most effective strategies to control outbreaks of communicable diseases. Individuals under isolation or quarantine experience both physical and mental effects. Therefore, given its widespread implementation around the world, it is pertinent to analyze this effect on physical and mental health. The psychosocial impact model, which divides four dimensions into two main points, exposure or protection and positive or negative responses, was used to analyze the psychosocial impact of quarantine. Objectives: The present study aimed to investigate the psychosocial impact of people exposed to or protected from quarantine. Methods: We conducted a search for primary articles in the Web of Science and Scopus databases, and after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, we meta-analyzed five of them. Results: Quarantined individuals were more likely to experience anxiety (K = 4; OR = 2.62) and depressive symptoms (K = 6; OR = 1.61) compared to those who did not undergo quarantine. Researchers discuss a twofold increase in the probability of anxiety or depression among those in quarantine. As a result, advancing interventions that reduce this impact is critical for both health and the global economy. Conclusions: In terms of economic variables, the non-moderation of GDP per capita and the moderation of the GINI index stand out, demonstrating that countries must move toward policies that promote the reconstruction of more resilient and inclusive societies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背景:隔离是控制传染病爆发的最有效策略之一。被隔离或检疫的人在身体和心理上都会受到影响。因此,鉴于隔离在世界各地的广泛实施,有必要分析其对身心健康的影响。社会心理影响模型将四个维度分为暴露或保护以及积极或消极反应两个要点,本研究采用该模型来分析隔离的社会心理影响。研究目的:本研究旨在调查暴露于检疫或受到检疫保护的人群的社会心理影响。研究方法我们在 Web of Science 和 Scopus 数据库中检索了主要文章,在应用纳入和排除标准后,我们对其中的 5 篇文章进行了元分析。结果显示与未接受检疫的人相比,接受检疫的人更容易出现焦虑(K = 4;OR = 2.62)和抑郁症状(K = 6;OR = 1.61)。研究人员发现,被隔离者出现焦虑或抑郁的概率增加了两倍。因此,推进能减少这种影响的干预措施对健康和全球经济都至关重要。结论:在经济变量方面,人均国内生产总值(GDP)和 GINI 指数(GINI index)的不温和现象尤为突出,这表明各国必须制定政策,促进重建更具复原力和包容性的社会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Healthcare
Healthcare Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal (free for readers), which publishes original theoretical and empirical work in the interdisciplinary area of all aspects of medicine and health care research. Healthcare publishes Original Research Articles, Reviews, Case Reports, Research Notes and Short Communications. We encourage researchers to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. For theoretical papers, full details of proofs must be provided so that the results can be checked; for experimental papers, full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Additionally, electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculations, experimental procedure, etc., can be deposited along with the publication as “Supplementary Material”.
期刊最新文献
Cost-Effectiveness of the Pneumococcal Vaccine in the Adult Population: A Systematic Review. Polish Firefighters' Participation in Interventions Related to Behavioral Disorders in the 2020-2022 Period: An Observation of Incidents. What Helps or Hinders End-of-Life Care in Adult Intensive Care Units in Saudi Arabia? A Mixed-Methods Study Protocol. Impact of a Clinical Decision Support System on the Efficiency and Effectiveness of Performing Medication Reviews in Community Pharmacies: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Benefits of Complementary Therapies During Pregnancy, Childbirth and Postpartum Period: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1