Correlation between perinatal abnormalities and decreased fetal movement as counted by a fetal movement acceleration measurement recorder: A prospective cohort study.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics Pub Date : 2024-12-17 DOI:10.1002/ijgo.16101
Eiji Ryo, Hideo Kamata, Keita Yatsuki
{"title":"Correlation between perinatal abnormalities and decreased fetal movement as counted by a fetal movement acceleration measurement recorder: A prospective cohort study.","authors":"Eiji Ryo, Hideo Kamata, Keita Yatsuki","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.16101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective was to study the relationship between a decrease in gross fetal movement during maternal night sleep counted by an objective method and abnormal perinatal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective cohort study. A total of 470 pregnant women recorded fetal movement with the fetal movement acceleration measurement recorder weekly after 28 weeks. The ratio of 10-s epochs with fetal movement to all epochs was calculated as the fetal movement parameter. When the parameter was below the 10th percentile of the previously made reference curve, it was defined as decreased movement. Women who showed a decreased movement at least once were classified into a study group, and the other women were classified into a control group. Abnormal perinatal outcomes between the two groups were compared with the Chi-square test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were more preterm births (19%) in the study group than in the control group (10%) (P = 0.0210). There was a significant difference for iatrogenic preterm birth (P = 0.0241) but not for spontaneous preterm birth (P = 0.4566). There were more hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (11.6%), small-for-gestational-age newborns (10.7%), and Apgar scores below 7 points at 1 min (7.4%) in the study group than in the control group (5.2%, 4.8%, and 2.6%, respectively) (P = 0.0329, 0.0459, and 0.0487, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A decrease in gross fetal movement during maternal night sleep was related to iatrogenic preterm births, small-for-gestational-age newborns, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, and low Apgar scores at 1 min.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.16101","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective was to study the relationship between a decrease in gross fetal movement during maternal night sleep counted by an objective method and abnormal perinatal outcomes.

Methods: This was a prospective cohort study. A total of 470 pregnant women recorded fetal movement with the fetal movement acceleration measurement recorder weekly after 28 weeks. The ratio of 10-s epochs with fetal movement to all epochs was calculated as the fetal movement parameter. When the parameter was below the 10th percentile of the previously made reference curve, it was defined as decreased movement. Women who showed a decreased movement at least once were classified into a study group, and the other women were classified into a control group. Abnormal perinatal outcomes between the two groups were compared with the Chi-square test.

Results: There were more preterm births (19%) in the study group than in the control group (10%) (P = 0.0210). There was a significant difference for iatrogenic preterm birth (P = 0.0241) but not for spontaneous preterm birth (P = 0.4566). There were more hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (11.6%), small-for-gestational-age newborns (10.7%), and Apgar scores below 7 points at 1 min (7.4%) in the study group than in the control group (5.2%, 4.8%, and 2.6%, respectively) (P = 0.0329, 0.0459, and 0.0487, respectively).

Conclusion: A decrease in gross fetal movement during maternal night sleep was related to iatrogenic preterm births, small-for-gestational-age newborns, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, and low Apgar scores at 1 min.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
目的目的是研究用客观方法计算的产妇夜间睡眠时胎动减少与围产期异常结果之间的关系:这是一项前瞻性队列研究。共有 470 名孕妇在 28 周后每周使用胎动加速度测量记录仪记录胎动。有胎动的 10 秒钟时间与所有时间的比值被计算为胎动参数。当该参数低于先前绘制的参考曲线的第 10 百分位数时,就被定义为胎动减少。至少出现过一次胎动减少的妇女被划分为研究组,其他妇女被划分为对照组。两组围产期异常结果的比较采用卡方检验:研究组的早产率(19%)高于对照组(10%)(P = 0.0210)。在先天性早产方面有明显差异(P = 0.0241),但在自发性早产方面没有明显差异(P = 0.4566)。与对照组(分别为 5.2%、4.8% 和 2.6%)相比(P = 0.0329、0.0459 和 0.0487),研究组的妊娠高血压疾病(11.6%)、小于妊娠年龄新生儿(10.7%)和 1 分钟 Apgar 评分低于 7 分的新生儿(7.4%)更多:结论:孕产妇夜间睡眠时胎动减少与先天性早产、小于妊娠年龄新生儿、妊娠期高血压疾病和 1 分钟内低阿普加评分有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
493
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics publishes articles on all aspects of basic and clinical research in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology and related subjects, with emphasis on matters of worldwide interest.
期刊最新文献
Complex cesarean section: Surgical approach to reduce the risks of intraoperative complications and postpartum hemorrhage. Does emotional freedom techniques affect premenstrual syndrome? A randomized controlled study. Exploring glycemic variability and time in range: Emerging indicators of at-risk pregnancy in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Informed consent and ethical issues pertaining to female sterilization-Scoping review. Comparative clinical and incremental cost-effectiveness analysis of treatments for pelvic inflammatory disease in southern Brazil.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1