Madison Webster, Brandon Baartman, Marlee Jones, Daniel C Terveen, John P Berdahl, Vance Thompson, Brent A Kramer, Tanner J Ferguson
{"title":"Light adjustable lens in eyes with a history of radial keratotomy.","authors":"Madison Webster, Brandon Baartman, Marlee Jones, Daniel C Terveen, John P Berdahl, Vance Thompson, Brent A Kramer, Tanner J Ferguson","doi":"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate visual and refractive outcomes in eyes with a history of radial keratotomy (RK) implanted with the second-generation light-adjustable lens (LAL).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Private practice, multiple locations.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective, consecutive case series.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eyes with a history of RK that underwent cataract surgery with implantation of the LAL and were targeted for emmetropia prior to lock-in were included. Data on the type and number of prior refractive surgeries were collected, in addition to the timing and number of postoperative adjustments. The primary outcome measures were uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and the percentage (%) of eyes within ±1.00 diopter (D), ±0.50 D, and ±0.25 D and of their refractive target.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>94 eyes from 77 patients were included. 28% (n = 26) were a history of 4-cut RK, 12% (n = 11) were 6-cut RK, 55% (n = 52) were 8-cut RK, and 5% (n = 5) were 16-cut RK. Overall, 82% (n = 77) of all eyes achieved 20/25 UDVA or better, 74% (n = 70) of all eyes achieved UDVA of 20/20 or better, and 94% (n = 88) were correctable to 20/20 or better postoperatively. For refractive outcomes, 98% (n = 92) of eyes were within ±1.00 D of target, 88% (n = 83) were within ±0.50 D, and 69% (n = 65) were within ±0.25 D of preoperative refractive target.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with a history of RK achieved favorable visual and refractive outcomes with the LAL. Postoperative light adjustments should be delayed to allow for refractive stabilization. The LAL is a promising option for post-RK patients who are motivated to obtain favorable uncorrected acuity after cataract surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":15214,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001596","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate visual and refractive outcomes in eyes with a history of radial keratotomy (RK) implanted with the second-generation light-adjustable lens (LAL).
Setting: Private practice, multiple locations.
Design: Retrospective, consecutive case series.
Methods: Eyes with a history of RK that underwent cataract surgery with implantation of the LAL and were targeted for emmetropia prior to lock-in were included. Data on the type and number of prior refractive surgeries were collected, in addition to the timing and number of postoperative adjustments. The primary outcome measures were uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and the percentage (%) of eyes within ±1.00 diopter (D), ±0.50 D, and ±0.25 D and of their refractive target.
Results: 94 eyes from 77 patients were included. 28% (n = 26) were a history of 4-cut RK, 12% (n = 11) were 6-cut RK, 55% (n = 52) were 8-cut RK, and 5% (n = 5) were 16-cut RK. Overall, 82% (n = 77) of all eyes achieved 20/25 UDVA or better, 74% (n = 70) of all eyes achieved UDVA of 20/20 or better, and 94% (n = 88) were correctable to 20/20 or better postoperatively. For refractive outcomes, 98% (n = 92) of eyes were within ±1.00 D of target, 88% (n = 83) were within ±0.50 D, and 69% (n = 65) were within ±0.25 D of preoperative refractive target.
Conclusions: Patients with a history of RK achieved favorable visual and refractive outcomes with the LAL. Postoperative light adjustments should be delayed to allow for refractive stabilization. The LAL is a promising option for post-RK patients who are motivated to obtain favorable uncorrected acuity after cataract surgery.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (JCRS), a preeminent peer-reviewed monthly ophthalmology publication, is the official journal of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS).
JCRS publishes high quality articles on all aspects of anterior segment surgery. In addition to original clinical studies, the journal features a consultation section, practical techniques, important cases, and reviews as well as basic science articles.