Survival of Partial Coverage Restorations on Posterior Teeth-A Scoping Review.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1111/jerd.13387
L S Prott, P Klein, F A Spitznagel, M B Blatz, S Pieralli, P C Gierthmuehlen
{"title":"Survival of Partial Coverage Restorations on Posterior Teeth-A Scoping Review.","authors":"L S Prott, P Klein, F A Spitznagel, M B Blatz, S Pieralli, P C Gierthmuehlen","doi":"10.1111/jerd.13387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the nature and availability of evidence on the clinical performance of posterior partial coverage restorations (PCR) fabricated from different ceramic materials, outcome definitions, measurement methods, study drop-outs and follow ups.</p><p><strong>Overview: </strong>A systematic literature search (inception-February 2024) was performed through MEDLINE, Scopus, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform to identify clinical studies with a focus on posterior PCRs (onlays, occlusal veneers and partial crowns) with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Thirteen of 31 included studies were randomized controlled trials (RCT) and 18 non-randomized studies of intervention (NRS). Six RCTs compared two different ceramic materials and might be suitable for meta-analysis. Differences in study design, definition of survival, evaluation methods, and statistical models for survival analysis were identified as reasons for expected heterogeneity among studies. The most common reasons for restoration failures were ceramic fractures and retention loss.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The evidence informing the effect of PCRs varied in definitions of survival and failure, complication classifications, and workflow approaches. RCTs addressing clinical performance of PCRs comparing different ceramic materials are available for conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses.</p>","PeriodicalId":15988,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13387","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the nature and availability of evidence on the clinical performance of posterior partial coverage restorations (PCR) fabricated from different ceramic materials, outcome definitions, measurement methods, study drop-outs and follow ups.

Overview: A systematic literature search (inception-February 2024) was performed through MEDLINE, Scopus, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform to identify clinical studies with a focus on posterior PCRs (onlays, occlusal veneers and partial crowns) with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Thirteen of 31 included studies were randomized controlled trials (RCT) and 18 non-randomized studies of intervention (NRS). Six RCTs compared two different ceramic materials and might be suitable for meta-analysis. Differences in study design, definition of survival, evaluation methods, and statistical models for survival analysis were identified as reasons for expected heterogeneity among studies. The most common reasons for restoration failures were ceramic fractures and retention loss.

Conclusion: The evidence informing the effect of PCRs varied in definitions of survival and failure, complication classifications, and workflow approaches. RCTs addressing clinical performance of PCRs comparing different ceramic materials are available for conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
目的调查不同陶瓷材料制作的后牙部分覆盖修复体(PCR)的临床表现、结果定义、测量方法、研究退出和随访等方面的证据的性质和可用性:通过MEDLINE、Scopus、CENTRAL、ClinicalTrials.gov和国际临床试验注册平台进行了系统的文献检索(起始时间至2024年2月),以确定至少随访1年的以后部PCR(嵌体、咬合贴面和部分冠)为重点的临床研究。在纳入的 31 项研究中,13 项为随机对照试验 (RCT),18 项为非随机干预研究 (NRS)。六项随机对照试验比较了两种不同的陶瓷材料,可能适合进行荟萃分析。研究设计、存活定义、评估方法和存活分析统计模型的不同被认为是造成研究间预期异质性的原因。修复失败最常见的原因是陶瓷断裂和固位丧失:结论:有关 PCR 效果的证据在存活和失败的定义、并发症分类以及工作流程方法方面存在差异。在进行系统回顾和荟萃分析时,可以参考针对 PCR 临床表现的 RCT,对不同的陶瓷材料进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
124
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry (JERD) is the longest standing peer-reviewed journal devoted solely to advancing the knowledge and practice of esthetic dentistry. Its goal is to provide the very latest evidence-based information in the realm of contemporary interdisciplinary esthetic dentistry through high quality clinical papers, sound research reports and educational features. The range of topics covered in the journal includes: - Interdisciplinary esthetic concepts - Implants - Conservative adhesive restorations - Tooth Whitening - Prosthodontic materials and techniques - Dental materials - Orthodontic, periodontal and endodontic esthetics - Esthetics related research - Innovations in esthetics
期刊最新文献
Esthetic and Functional Rehabilitation: Retreatment of Anterior Fixed Dental Prothesis With Biologically Oriented Preparation Technique and Digital Workflow. The Value of a Tooth for Alveolar Ridge Management; Strategies to Manage Ankylosed Maxillary Anterior Teeth in Young Patients. Survival of Partial Coverage Restorations on Posterior Teeth-A Scoping Review. Treatment of a Gingival Recession With In-Office Orthodontic Aligners and Gingival Graft. Rehabilitation of the Worn Dentition With Direct and Indirect Minimally Invasive Concepts-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1