Fostering Adherence to Evidence-Based Care in the Management of Musculoskeletal Shoulder Pain: A Mixed Methods Study.

IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1093/ptj/pzae176
Christina Maxwell, Jon Salsberg, Katie Robinson, François Desmeules, Véronique Lowry, Christie Tetreault, Karen McCreesh
{"title":"Fostering Adherence to Evidence-Based Care in the Management of Musculoskeletal Shoulder Pain: A Mixed Methods Study.","authors":"Christina Maxwell, Jon Salsberg, Katie Robinson, François Desmeules, Véronique Lowry, Christie Tetreault, Karen McCreesh","doi":"10.1093/ptj/pzae176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective was to identify the priorities of individuals with musculoskeletal shoulder pain and their health care providers (HCPs) that are perceived to foster multi-stakeholder adherence to evidence-based recommendations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study used a mixed methods design, informed by concept mapping. Patients with shoulder pain (ie, ≥6 weeks) and HCPs involved in their care (recruited via social media, email, etc.) were invited to complete an initial survey to identify perceived priorities to foster adherence to evidence-based recommendations. Preliminary data sorting resulted in a final priority list, with a subset (n = 20) of respondents rating their importance using a Likert scale. A public and patient involvement (PPI) panel (N = 8) assisted in this rating phase, further sorting of priorities based on thematic similarities (ie, into categories and then domains), analysis, interpretation, and developing a concept map illustrating relationships between them.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and fifty-four participants (HCPs = 133; Patients = 21) responded to the initial survey, generating 77 priorities, grouped into 13 categories, and then into 3 domains; 1) Education, 2) Patient-centred care, and 3) Health care communication. Patients prioritized categories relating to the provision of a specific diagnosis, the establishment of a strong therapeutic relationship, and the need for education on progress and recovery timelines, as well as treatment options. HCPs prioritized these same educational categories, also prioritizing the need for tailoring exercise therapy and providing a unified message on best management. PPI panelists identified education on treatment options coupled with a strong therapeutic alliance and a unified message on best management to be of pivotal importance in fostering adherence. Panelists also stressed that future knowledge translation resources must provide tailored education.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HCPs and patients agree on the need to prioritize education related to progress and recovery timelines as well as treatment options, with a strong therapeutic alliance and a unified message on best management also considered of pivotal importance for adherence to evidence-based recommendations.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>To the knowledge of the authors, this is the first study, including a broad range of stakeholder groups spanning across 11 different countries, to explore the priorities that stakeholders perceived to support stricter adherence to evidence-based recommendations for musculoskeletal shoulder pain, with the relationship between these priorities visually illustrated using a concept map. Patients and HCPs were united in their prioritization of education relating to expected progress and recovery timelines, as well as treatment options and supporting evidence. Stakeholders also identified the need for greater emphasis to be placed on establishing a therapeutic relationship and on integrating shared decision-making into clinical practice to further facilitate adherence. Education relating to treatment options and supporting evidence, a strong therapeutic relationship, and a unified message on best management were perceived by the PPI panel as being pivotal in facilitating adherence to evidence-based treatment. The findings of this study highlight the need for improved tailoring of educational resources for shoulder pain, as well as more cohesive messaging from health care providers, both assisting in supporting first-line treatments, such as exercise therapy, for musculoskeletal shoulder pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":20093,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzae176","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective was to identify the priorities of individuals with musculoskeletal shoulder pain and their health care providers (HCPs) that are perceived to foster multi-stakeholder adherence to evidence-based recommendations.

Methods: The study used a mixed methods design, informed by concept mapping. Patients with shoulder pain (ie, ≥6 weeks) and HCPs involved in their care (recruited via social media, email, etc.) were invited to complete an initial survey to identify perceived priorities to foster adherence to evidence-based recommendations. Preliminary data sorting resulted in a final priority list, with a subset (n = 20) of respondents rating their importance using a Likert scale. A public and patient involvement (PPI) panel (N = 8) assisted in this rating phase, further sorting of priorities based on thematic similarities (ie, into categories and then domains), analysis, interpretation, and developing a concept map illustrating relationships between them.

Results: One hundred and fifty-four participants (HCPs = 133; Patients = 21) responded to the initial survey, generating 77 priorities, grouped into 13 categories, and then into 3 domains; 1) Education, 2) Patient-centred care, and 3) Health care communication. Patients prioritized categories relating to the provision of a specific diagnosis, the establishment of a strong therapeutic relationship, and the need for education on progress and recovery timelines, as well as treatment options. HCPs prioritized these same educational categories, also prioritizing the need for tailoring exercise therapy and providing a unified message on best management. PPI panelists identified education on treatment options coupled with a strong therapeutic alliance and a unified message on best management to be of pivotal importance in fostering adherence. Panelists also stressed that future knowledge translation resources must provide tailored education.

Conclusion: HCPs and patients agree on the need to prioritize education related to progress and recovery timelines as well as treatment options, with a strong therapeutic alliance and a unified message on best management also considered of pivotal importance for adherence to evidence-based recommendations.

Impact: To the knowledge of the authors, this is the first study, including a broad range of stakeholder groups spanning across 11 different countries, to explore the priorities that stakeholders perceived to support stricter adherence to evidence-based recommendations for musculoskeletal shoulder pain, with the relationship between these priorities visually illustrated using a concept map. Patients and HCPs were united in their prioritization of education relating to expected progress and recovery timelines, as well as treatment options and supporting evidence. Stakeholders also identified the need for greater emphasis to be placed on establishing a therapeutic relationship and on integrating shared decision-making into clinical practice to further facilitate adherence. Education relating to treatment options and supporting evidence, a strong therapeutic relationship, and a unified message on best management were perceived by the PPI panel as being pivotal in facilitating adherence to evidence-based treatment. The findings of this study highlight the need for improved tailoring of educational resources for shoulder pain, as well as more cohesive messaging from health care providers, both assisting in supporting first-line treatments, such as exercise therapy, for musculoskeletal shoulder pain.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在治疗肩部肌肉骨骼疼痛过程中坚持循证护理:一项混合方法研究。
目的目的是确定肩部肌肉骨骼疼痛患者及其医疗保健提供者(HCPs)认为促进多方利益相关者遵守循证建议的优先事项:研究采用混合方法设计,并以概念图为基础。研究邀请肩痛患者(即≥6周)和参与其护理的 HCP(通过社交媒体、电子邮件等方式招募)完成一项初步调查,以确定促进遵循循证建议的优先事项。初步的数据整理产生了最终的优先事项列表,其中一部分受访者(n = 20)使用李克特量表对其重要性进行了评分。一个公众和患者参与(PPI)小组(N = 8)在这一评分阶段提供了协助,根据主题相似性(即分为类别和领域)对优先事项进行了进一步分类、分析、解释,并绘制了一张概念图来说明它们之间的关系:154 名参与者(医护人员 = 133 人;患者 = 21 人)对初步调查做出了回应,共提出 77 个优先事项,分为 13 个类别,然后再分为 3 个领域:1)教育;2)以患者为中心的护理;3)医护沟通。患者优先考虑的类别涉及提供具体诊断、建立稳固的治疗关系,以及对进展和康复时间表以及治疗方案的教育需求。医护人员也优先考虑了这些教育类别,同时还优先考虑了定制运动疗法和提供统一的最佳管理信息的必要性。PPI 小组成员认为,治疗方案教育、强有力的治疗联盟和统一的最佳管理信息对于促进患者坚持治疗至关重要。小组成员还强调,未来的知识转化资源必须提供有针对性的教育:结论:医疗保健人员和患者一致认为有必要优先开展与进展和康复时间表以及治疗方案相关的教育,同时认为牢固的治疗联盟和统一的最佳管理信息对于坚持循证建议至关重要:据作者所知,这是第一项包括 11 个不同国家的广泛利益相关者群体的研究,旨在探讨利益相关者认为支持更严格遵守肩部肌肉骨骼疼痛循证建议的优先事项,并使用概念图直观地说明了这些优先事项之间的关系。患者和保健医生一致认为,与预期进展和康复时间表以及治疗方案和辅助证据相关的教育是优先事项。利益相关者还认为需要更加重视建立治疗关系,并将共同决策纳入临床实践,以进一步促进患者坚持治疗。公众宣传小组认为,与治疗方案和辅助证据相关的教育、稳固的治疗关系以及关于最佳管理的统一信息是促进坚持循证治疗的关键。这项研究的结果突出表明,有必要改进肩痛教育资源的定制工作,并提高医疗服务提供者传递信息的一致性,这两者都有助于支持肩部肌肉骨骼疼痛的一线治疗(如运动疗法)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Physical Therapy
Physical Therapy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Physical Therapy (PTJ) engages and inspires an international readership on topics related to physical therapy. As the leading international journal for research in physical therapy and related fields, PTJ publishes innovative and highly relevant content for both clinicians and scientists and uses a variety of interactive approaches to communicate that content, with the expressed purpose of improving patient care. PTJ"s circulation in 2008 is more than 72,000. Its 2007 impact factor was 2.152. The mean time from submission to first decision is 58 days. Time from acceptance to publication online is less than or equal to 3 months and from acceptance to publication in print is less than or equal to 5 months.
期刊最新文献
Online Graded Motor Imagery Is Effective in Women Diagnosed With Pelvic Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Gait Speed Modifies Efficacy of Home-Based Exercise for Falls in Older Adults with a Previous Fall: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Association between Physical Therapists' Attitudes and Beliefs and the Functional Outcomes of Patients with Low Back Pain: A Multilevel Analysis Study. Effectiveness of Additional or Standalone Corticosteroid Injections Compared to Physical Therapist Interventions in Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Monitoring Treatment Fidelity in a Pragmatic Pediatric Rehabilitation Trial Comparing Two Physical Therapy Schedules: Analysis and Unexpected Findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1