Comparison of the Analgesic Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block, Paravertebral Block and Quadratus Lumborum Block for Pelvi-ureteric Surgeries: A Randomized Double-Blind, Noninferiority Trial.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pain physician Pub Date : 2024-12-01
Amir Abouzkry Elsayed, Mohammad Fouad Algyar, Sherif Kamal Arafa
{"title":"Comparison of the Analgesic Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block, Paravertebral Block and Quadratus Lumborum Block for Pelvi-ureteric Surgeries: A Randomized Double-Blind, Noninferiority Trial.","authors":"Amir Abouzkry Elsayed, Mohammad Fouad Algyar, Sherif Kamal Arafa","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effective postoperative analgesia enhances the patient's comfort and facilitates early mobilization and recovery.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study compared the analgesic efficacy of the erector spinae plane block (ESPB), thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB), and quadratus lumborum block (QLB) for pelvi-ureteric surgeries. The primary outcome measure in the study was the total morphine consumption during the first 48 hours following the operation. The secondary outcomes included the levels of postoperative pain, the time of first rescue analgesia, and the satisfaction of patients.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Randomized double-blind noninferiority trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Kafr Elsheikh University Hospitals, Egypt.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This trial was performed on 90 patients between the ages of 21 and 65, men and women, who had an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status of I or II and were undergoing elective pelvi-ureteric surgeries. Patients were assigned equally to the TPVB, QLB, and ESPB groups. Before the induction of general anesthesia, blocks were performed using 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine. The numeric rating scale (NRS) score was measured in the post-anesthesia care unit at one, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 48 hours. If the NRS score was ≥ 4, the patient received 3 mg of intravenous morphine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The time of the performing block was shorter in the ESPB group than in the TPVB or QLB group (P < 0.001), but the TPVB and QLB groups were comparable. The intraoperative consumption of fentanyl and total consumption of morphine at 24 and then 48 hours postoperatively were comparable among the 3 groups, as were the satisfaction of the patient, NRS scores, time of first rescue analgesia, and complications (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>A relatively small sample size, a single-center setting, and the absence of a control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In pelvi-ureteric surgeries, the ESPB, TPVB, and QLB provided comparable intraoperative and postoperative analgesia, patient satisfaction, and postoperative complications, but the ESPB was performed more quickly. Therefore, we recommend the ESPB as a routine regional anesthetic technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":19841,"journal":{"name":"Pain physician","volume":"27 10","pages":"E1055-E1063"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain physician","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Effective postoperative analgesia enhances the patient's comfort and facilitates early mobilization and recovery.

Objective: This study compared the analgesic efficacy of the erector spinae plane block (ESPB), thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB), and quadratus lumborum block (QLB) for pelvi-ureteric surgeries. The primary outcome measure in the study was the total morphine consumption during the first 48 hours following the operation. The secondary outcomes included the levels of postoperative pain, the time of first rescue analgesia, and the satisfaction of patients.

Study design: Randomized double-blind noninferiority trial.

Setting: Kafr Elsheikh University Hospitals, Egypt.

Methods: This trial was performed on 90 patients between the ages of 21 and 65, men and women, who had an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status of I or II and were undergoing elective pelvi-ureteric surgeries. Patients were assigned equally to the TPVB, QLB, and ESPB groups. Before the induction of general anesthesia, blocks were performed using 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine. The numeric rating scale (NRS) score was measured in the post-anesthesia care unit at one, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 48 hours. If the NRS score was ≥ 4, the patient received 3 mg of intravenous morphine.

Results: The time of the performing block was shorter in the ESPB group than in the TPVB or QLB group (P < 0.001), but the TPVB and QLB groups were comparable. The intraoperative consumption of fentanyl and total consumption of morphine at 24 and then 48 hours postoperatively were comparable among the 3 groups, as were the satisfaction of the patient, NRS scores, time of first rescue analgesia, and complications (P > 0.05).

Limitations: A relatively small sample size, a single-center setting, and the absence of a control group.

Conclusions: In pelvi-ureteric surgeries, the ESPB, TPVB, and QLB provided comparable intraoperative and postoperative analgesia, patient satisfaction, and postoperative complications, but the ESPB was performed more quickly. Therefore, we recommend the ESPB as a routine regional anesthetic technique.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
竖脊肌平面阻滞、椎旁阻滞和腰方肌阻滞用于盆腔输尿管手术的镇痛效果比较:一项随机双盲、非劣效性试验。
背景:有效的术后镇痛可以提高患者的舒适度,促进早期活动和恢复。目的:比较竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)、胸椎旁阻滞(TPVB)和腰方肌阻滞(QLB)在盆腔输尿管手术中的镇痛效果。研究的主要指标是术后48小时内吗啡的总消耗量。次要结局包括术后疼痛程度、首次抢救镇痛时间和患者满意度。研究设计:随机双盲非劣效性试验。地点:埃及Kafr Elsheikh大学医院。方法:本试验纳入90例年龄在21 ~ 65岁之间的患者,男性和女性,美国麻醉医师学会(American Society of anesthesologists)的身体状态为I或II,并正在进行选择性骨盆输尿管手术。患者被平均分配到TPVB、QLB和ESPB组。全麻诱导前,用20ml 0.25%布比卡因进行阻滞。数值评定量表(NRS)在麻醉后护理单元于1、2、4、6、8、12、24、36和48小时进行评分。如果NRS评分≥4分,则静脉注射吗啡3mg。结果:ESPB组阻滞时间短于TPVB组和QLB组(P < 0.001),但TPVB组和QLB组具有可比性。三组患者术中芬太尼用量、术后24、48 h吗啡总用量、患者满意度、NRS评分、首次抢救镇痛时间、并发症发生率比较,差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。局限性:样本量相对较小,单中心设置,缺乏对照组。结论:在盆腔输尿管手术中,ESPB、TPVB和QLB在术中和术后镇痛、患者满意度和术后并发症方面具有可比性,但ESPB的执行速度更快。因此,我们推荐ESPB作为常规的区域麻醉技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pain physician
Pain physician CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
21.60%
发文量
234
期刊介绍: Pain Physician Journal is the official publication of the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP). The open access journal is published 6 times a year. Pain Physician Journal is a peer-reviewed, multi-disciplinary, open access journal written by and directed to an audience of interventional pain physicians, clinicians and basic scientists with an interest in interventional pain management and pain medicine. Pain Physician Journal presents the latest studies, research, and information vital to those in the emerging specialty of interventional pain management – and critical to the people they serve.
期刊最新文献
2024 Indices. A 24% Decline in the Utilization of Epidural Procedure Visits for Chronic Spinal Pain Management in the Medicare Population from 2019 to 2022: Updated Analysis of the Effect of Multiple Factors. Association Between Chronotype and Chronic Neuropathic Pain Sensitivity: A Pilot Prospective, Observational, Single-Center, Cross-Sectional Study. Clinical Response to Joint Infiltration With Bone Marrow Aspirate in Hip Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Single-arm Meta-analysis. Comparative Study Between the Analgesic Effect of Prednisolone and Pregabalin in Managing Post Dural Puncture Headache After Lower Limb Surgeries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1