Development of a gender-specific European job exposure matrix (EuroJEM) for physical workload and its validation against musculoskeletal pain.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.5271/sjweh.4203
Svetlana Solovieva, Alexis Descatha, Ingrid Sivesind Mehlum, Eira Viikari-Juntura, Karina Undem, Karin Berglund, Fabien Gilbert, Francesca Wuytack, Angelo d'Errico, Kathryn Badarin, Bradley Evanoff, Katarina Kjellberg
{"title":"Development of a gender-specific European job exposure matrix (EuroJEM) for physical workload and its validation against musculoskeletal pain.","authors":"Svetlana Solovieva, Alexis Descatha, Ingrid Sivesind Mehlum, Eira Viikari-Juntura, Karina Undem, Karin Berglund, Fabien Gilbert, Francesca Wuytack, Angelo d'Errico, Kathryn Badarin, Bradley Evanoff, Katarina Kjellberg","doi":"10.5271/sjweh.4203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim was to develop a gender-specific European job exposure matrix (EuroJEM) for occupational physical workload and study its predictive validity for musculoskeletal pain in four European cohorts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>National, gender-specific JEM from Finland, France, Norway and Sweden, based on self-reported exposure information, were evaluated for similarities in exposures, exposure definitions, and occupational coding. The EuroJEM harmonized five exposures: heavy lifting, faster breathing due to heavy workload, kneeling/squatting, forward bent posture, and working with hands above shoulder level. Our expert panel addressed disagreements and missing information to reach consensus on exposure levels across occupations. To assess predictive validity of the EuroJEM, we examined associations between the harmonized exposure measures and self-reported musculoskeletal pain across the four cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The EuroJEM provides semi-quantitative exposure estimates for 374 ISCO-88 (COM) occupational codes. Five categories of exposure were defined by the proportion of workers exposed within each occupation. Comparable and statistically significant associations were found between EuroJEM exposures and low back, shoulder, and knee pain across all cohorts and genders, except for knee pain among women in the Finnish cohort. For instance, in both genders heavy lifting, faster breathing due to heavy workload, and forward bent posture were statistically significantly associated with low-back pain in all four cohorts, with OR ranging from 1.25-2.18 (men) and 1.23-2.04 (women).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite differences in study populations and outcome definitions, good predictive validity was observed in each national cohort, suggesting that EuroJEM can be an effective tool for exposure assessment in large-scale European epidemiological studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":21528,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.4203","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The aim was to develop a gender-specific European job exposure matrix (EuroJEM) for occupational physical workload and study its predictive validity for musculoskeletal pain in four European cohorts.

Methods: National, gender-specific JEM from Finland, France, Norway and Sweden, based on self-reported exposure information, were evaluated for similarities in exposures, exposure definitions, and occupational coding. The EuroJEM harmonized five exposures: heavy lifting, faster breathing due to heavy workload, kneeling/squatting, forward bent posture, and working with hands above shoulder level. Our expert panel addressed disagreements and missing information to reach consensus on exposure levels across occupations. To assess predictive validity of the EuroJEM, we examined associations between the harmonized exposure measures and self-reported musculoskeletal pain across the four cohorts.

Results: The EuroJEM provides semi-quantitative exposure estimates for 374 ISCO-88 (COM) occupational codes. Five categories of exposure were defined by the proportion of workers exposed within each occupation. Comparable and statistically significant associations were found between EuroJEM exposures and low back, shoulder, and knee pain across all cohorts and genders, except for knee pain among women in the Finnish cohort. For instance, in both genders heavy lifting, faster breathing due to heavy workload, and forward bent posture were statistically significantly associated with low-back pain in all four cohorts, with OR ranging from 1.25-2.18 (men) and 1.23-2.04 (women).

Conclusions: Despite differences in study populations and outcome definitions, good predictive validity was observed in each national cohort, suggesting that EuroJEM can be an effective tool for exposure assessment in large-scale European epidemiological studies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发针对不同性别的欧洲体力劳动暴露矩阵(EuroJEM),并针对肌肉骨骼疼痛对其进行验证。
目的:目的是为职业体力工作量开发一个性别特定的欧洲工作暴露矩阵(EuroJEM),并在四个欧洲队列中研究其对肌肉骨骼疼痛的预测有效性。方法:对来自芬兰、法国、挪威和瑞典的国家、性别特异性JEM,基于自我报告的暴露信息,评估暴露、暴露定义和职业编码的相似性。EuroJEM协调了五种暴露:举重、由于繁重的工作负荷而导致的呼吸加快、跪/蹲、前屈姿势和双手高于肩膀水平工作。我们的专家小组解决了分歧和缺失的信息,就不同职业的暴露水平达成了共识。为了评估EuroJEM的预测有效性,我们检查了四个队列中统一暴露测量和自我报告的肌肉骨骼疼痛之间的关系。结果:EuroJEM提供了374个ISCO-88 (COM)职业代码的半定量暴露估计。根据每个职业中受照射工人的比例确定了五类接触。除芬兰队列中女性的膝关节疼痛外,在所有队列和性别中,EuroJEM暴露与腰背部、肩部和膝关节疼痛之间存在可比性和统计学上显著的关联。例如,在所有四个队列中,无论是男性还是女性,举重、高负荷导致的呼吸加快和前屈姿势都与腰痛有统计学意义上的显著相关,OR范围为1.25-2.18(男性)和1.23-2.04(女性)。结论:尽管研究人群和结果定义存在差异,但在每个国家队列中都观察到良好的预测效度,这表明EuroJEM可以作为大规模欧洲流行病学研究中暴露评估的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health
Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
9.50%
发文量
65
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal is to promote research in the fields of occupational and environmental health and safety and to increase knowledge through the publication of original research articles, systematic reviews, and other information of high interest. Areas of interest include occupational and environmental epidemiology, occupational and environmental medicine, psychosocial factors at work, physical work load, physical activity work-related mental and musculoskeletal problems, aging, work ability and return to work, working hours and health, occupational hygiene and toxicology, work safety and injury epidemiology as well as occupational health services. In addition to observational studies, quasi-experimental and intervention studies are welcome as well as methodological papers, occupational cohort profiles, and studies associated with economic evaluation. The Journal also publishes short communications, case reports, commentaries, discussion papers, clinical questions, consensus reports, meeting reports, other reports, book reviews, news, and announcements (jobs, courses, events etc).
期刊最新文献
Memory function and early exit from paid employment through different pathways among ageing European workers. Remote work - the new normal needs more research. Effects of a workplace participatory approach to support working caregivers in balancing work, private life and informal care: a randomized controlled trial. Parental precarious employment and the mental health of adolescents: a Swedish registry study. Organizational strategies of eldercare work and health - Is the daily number of residents cared for over 14 months associated with back pain?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1