Evolving patterns of first blood product use in trauma in the era of hemorrhage control resuscitation.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Transfusion Pub Date : 2024-12-17 DOI:10.1111/trf.18100
Maryam Asif, Safee U Haider, Zhinan Liu, Lynn G Stansbury, John R Hess
{"title":"Evolving patterns of first blood product use in trauma in the era of hemorrhage control resuscitation.","authors":"Maryam Asif, Safee U Haider, Zhinan Liu, Lynn G Stansbury, John R Hess","doi":"10.1111/trf.18100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We reviewed trauma blood use at our US regional trauma center 2011-2022-including PROPPR trial participation 2012-2014 and initiation of whole blood availability in 2019-to assess the implementation of early coagulation support in acute trauma care.</p><p><strong>Study design/methods: </strong>We identified all acute trauma patients recorded by our Trauma Registry as arriving at our large US regional Level 1 trauma center from April 6, 2011 (Blood Bank opening) through December 2022. Patient cohort data were then linked directly to Blood Bank final-product-issue date/time data to identify patients receiving any blood product in the first 24 h of care and then, specifically, at least one unit of Red Blood Cells (RBC), Plasma, or Whole Blood (WB). Results were binned as: \"RBC first,\" \"Plasma first,\" \"Both at the same time,\" or \"WB first.\"</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over the study period, 73,634 acute trauma patients received care, and 12,927 received at least one unit of a blood product. The proportion receiving plasma or a combination of plasma and RBCs as the initial transfusion increased after 2015 from 33% to 66%, while the proportion receiving packed RBCs alone decreased from 57% to about 18%. Since its introduction in 2019, the use of WB as the first product has grown to 20%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This retrospective cohort study documents the increasing use of plasma and now WB as initial products issued in trauma resuscitation, reflecting acceptance of coagulation support as the standard of care and the use of hemostatic resuscitation protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":23266,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.18100","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We reviewed trauma blood use at our US regional trauma center 2011-2022-including PROPPR trial participation 2012-2014 and initiation of whole blood availability in 2019-to assess the implementation of early coagulation support in acute trauma care.

Study design/methods: We identified all acute trauma patients recorded by our Trauma Registry as arriving at our large US regional Level 1 trauma center from April 6, 2011 (Blood Bank opening) through December 2022. Patient cohort data were then linked directly to Blood Bank final-product-issue date/time data to identify patients receiving any blood product in the first 24 h of care and then, specifically, at least one unit of Red Blood Cells (RBC), Plasma, or Whole Blood (WB). Results were binned as: "RBC first," "Plasma first," "Both at the same time," or "WB first."

Results: Over the study period, 73,634 acute trauma patients received care, and 12,927 received at least one unit of a blood product. The proportion receiving plasma or a combination of plasma and RBCs as the initial transfusion increased after 2015 from 33% to 66%, while the proportion receiving packed RBCs alone decreased from 57% to about 18%. Since its introduction in 2019, the use of WB as the first product has grown to 20%.

Conclusions: This retrospective cohort study documents the increasing use of plasma and now WB as initial products issued in trauma resuscitation, reflecting acceptance of coagulation support as the standard of care and the use of hemostatic resuscitation protocols.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背景:我们回顾了美国地区创伤中心 2011-2022 年的创伤用血情况--包括 2012-2014 年参与 PROPPR 试验和 2019 年开始提供全血--以评估急性创伤护理中早期凝血支持的实施情况:我们确定了由创伤登记处记录的从 2011 年 4 月 6 日(血库开放)到 2022 年 12 月期间抵达我们美国大型地区一级创伤中心的所有急性创伤患者。然后将患者队列数据与血库最终产品发放日期/时间数据直接关联起来,以确定在护理的前 24 小时内接受过任何血液产品的患者,特别是至少接受过一个单位的红细胞(RBC)、血浆或全血(WB)的患者。结果分为以下几类"先用红细胞"、"先用血浆"、"同时用两种 "或 "先用全血":在研究期间,73634 名急性创伤患者接受了治疗,其中 12927 人接受了至少一个单位的血液制品。2015年后,接受血浆或血浆与红细胞组合作为首次输血的比例从33%增至66%,而仅接受包装红细胞的比例从57%降至约18%。自2019年引入WB作为首批产品以来,使用WB的比例已增至20%:这项回顾性队列研究记录了在创伤复苏中越来越多地使用血浆和现在的 WB 作为首发产品,这反映了凝血支持被接受为护理标准以及止血复苏方案的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transfusion
Transfusion 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
20.70%
发文量
426
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: TRANSFUSION is the foremost publication in the world for new information regarding transfusion medicine. Written by and for members of AABB and other health-care workers, TRANSFUSION reports on the latest technical advances, discusses opposing viewpoints regarding controversial issues, and presents key conference proceedings. In addition to blood banking and transfusion medicine topics, TRANSFUSION presents submissions concerning patient blood management, tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular, and gene therapies.
期刊最新文献
Biotinylation of human platelets is compatible with pathogen inactivation treatment and cold storage for clinical studies. Evolving patterns of first blood product use in trauma in the era of hemorrhage control resuscitation. Effect of concurrent pathogen reduction (amotosalen/UVA) and gamma/x-ray irradiation on biochemical characteristics of apheresis platelets in additive solution. ABO*cisAB allele with unusual phenotype in a Brazilian family. Enhanced oxygen availability and preserved aggregative function in platelet concentrates stored at reduced platelet concentration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1