Yorkshire and the Humber GP trainee perspectives on incomplete evidence outcomes at ARCP.

IF 1.5 Q3 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE Education for Primary Care Pub Date : 2024-12-17 DOI:10.1080/14739879.2024.2435612
Timothy Dixon, Martin Sutcliffe
{"title":"Yorkshire and the Humber GP trainee perspectives on incomplete evidence outcomes at ARCP.","authors":"Timothy Dixon, Martin Sutcliffe","doi":"10.1080/14739879.2024.2435612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>June 2023 saw an exceptionally high proportion of Outcome 5s (incomplete evidence) issued at the annual review of competency progression (ARCP) for GP Trainees in Yorkshire and the Humber (Y&H) Deanery. These outcomes created considerable time, administrative and financial costs for the deanery. Additionally, it was believed that receiving non-standard outcomes at ARCP would be detrimental to trainee wellbeing. All GP Trainees in Y&H Deanery who received an Outcome 5 at their ARCP in June 2023 were surveyed. They were asked to report their experience of receiving this outcome with reference to their wellbeing. The survey also sought to understand the reasons for this rise in non-standard outcomes to guide quality improvement work within the deanery. Trainee perspectives revealed through this survey have guided reforms within the deanery to the structure and content of teaching and resources for GP trainees. It is believed these findings may be of similar value to other educators. 47% of eligible trainees responded to the survey. It was significantly reported that receiving an Outcome 5 felt stressful. However, trainees also reported that the time and instruction given upon receiving Outcome 5 was adequate, and they felt well supported by their educational supervisors. Preparation for ARCP was described as a neutral activity. The most frequent causes for receiving Outcome 5 were as follows: accessing and evidencing Basic Life Support (BLS) training, misunderstanding Safeguarding Requirements, incorrectly completing Form R and portfolio evidence not being seen by assessors. Further detail on these issues is described in the report below.</p>","PeriodicalId":46436,"journal":{"name":"Education for Primary Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education for Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14739879.2024.2435612","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

June 2023 saw an exceptionally high proportion of Outcome 5s (incomplete evidence) issued at the annual review of competency progression (ARCP) for GP Trainees in Yorkshire and the Humber (Y&H) Deanery. These outcomes created considerable time, administrative and financial costs for the deanery. Additionally, it was believed that receiving non-standard outcomes at ARCP would be detrimental to trainee wellbeing. All GP Trainees in Y&H Deanery who received an Outcome 5 at their ARCP in June 2023 were surveyed. They were asked to report their experience of receiving this outcome with reference to their wellbeing. The survey also sought to understand the reasons for this rise in non-standard outcomes to guide quality improvement work within the deanery. Trainee perspectives revealed through this survey have guided reforms within the deanery to the structure and content of teaching and resources for GP trainees. It is believed these findings may be of similar value to other educators. 47% of eligible trainees responded to the survey. It was significantly reported that receiving an Outcome 5 felt stressful. However, trainees also reported that the time and instruction given upon receiving Outcome 5 was adequate, and they felt well supported by their educational supervisors. Preparation for ARCP was described as a neutral activity. The most frequent causes for receiving Outcome 5 were as follows: accessing and evidencing Basic Life Support (BLS) training, misunderstanding Safeguarding Requirements, incorrectly completing Form R and portfolio evidence not being seen by assessors. Further detail on these issues is described in the report below.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2023 年 6 月,约克郡和亨伯(Y&H)院长辖区的全科医生培训生在能力进展年度审查(ARCP)中出现了极高比例的结果 5(证据不完整)。这些结果为院长办公室带来了大量的时间、行政和财务成本。此外,ARCP 的非标准结果被认为会损害受训者的健康。我们对 Y&H 学区所有在 2023 年 6 月 ARCP 中获得结果 5 的全科医生培训生进行了调查。受访者被要求报告他们在获得这一结果时的经历以及他们的健康状况。该调查还试图了解非标准结果增加的原因,以指导该院的质量改进工作。这项调查所揭示的受训人员观点为院长办公室改革全科医生受训人员教学和资源的结构与内容提供了指导。相信这些调查结果对其他教育工作者也有类似的价值。47%的合格受训人员对调查做出了回应。调查显示,接受成果 5 的学员感觉压力很大。不过,受训者也表示,在获得成果 5 时,他们获得了充足的时间和指导,而且他们感觉得到了教育督导的大力支持。ARCP 的准备工作被描述为一项中性活动。获得成果 5 的最常见原因如下:获得基本生命支持 (BLS) 培训并提供证据、误解了 "保障要求"、错误填写表格 R 以及评审员未看到作品集证据。有关这些问题的更多详情,请参阅以下报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Education for Primary Care
Education for Primary Care PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Education for Primary Care aims to reflect the best experience, expertise and innovative ideas in the development of undergraduate, postgraduate and continuing primary care education. The journal is UK based but welcomes contributions from all over the world. Readers will benefit from the broader perspectives on educational activities provided through the contributions of all health professionals, including general practitioners, nurses, midwives, health visitors, community nurses and managers. This sharing of experiences has the potential for enhancing healthcare delivery and for promoting interprofessional working.
期刊最新文献
Yorkshire and the Humber GP trainee perspectives on incomplete evidence outcomes at ARCP. What impact does widening participation to medicine have on the medical workforce in the UK: a scoping review. Challenging the validity and fairness of workplace-based assessments in general practice. Generalists and specialists. Structured POCUS education for primary care physicians: the transition from short workshops to sustainable longitudinal learning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1