Development of a perceived nutrition care competencies scale for Japanese dietetic students: A cross-sectional survey

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1111/jhn.13409
Sayaka Yamamoto, Yuko S. Yoshimoto, Kengo Yoshii, Ryo Shimizu, Ritsuko Ohnishi, Hiroko Takahashi, Takayo Kawakami
{"title":"Development of a perceived nutrition care competencies scale for Japanese dietetic students: A cross-sectional survey","authors":"Sayaka Yamamoto,&nbsp;Yuko S. Yoshimoto,&nbsp;Kengo Yoshii,&nbsp;Ryo Shimizu,&nbsp;Ritsuko Ohnishi,&nbsp;Hiroko Takahashi,&nbsp;Takayo Kawakami","doi":"10.1111/jhn.13409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>There are currently few appropriate instruments for assessing nutrition care competencies in clinical practice. This study aimed to develop a perceived nutrition care competencies (PNCC) scale for dietetic students and test its validity. Factors that influence PNCC scores were examined through a cross-sectional study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methodology</h3>\n \n <p>This cross-sectional survey involved 501 dietetic students (mean age of 21.4 years, 428 females) and employed a web-based questionnaire between September 2022 and February 2023. A scale derived from previous research was used to assess nutrition management practices and basic dietetic competencies. Questionnaire data were analysed using exploratory factor analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Exploratory factor analysis identified five factors: nutritional status assessment and preparation for intervention, communication skills for nutritional support, nutritional diagnosis and recording, supplementation suggestions and coordination and dietitian orientation and attitude. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that field practice increased the ‘nutrition diagnosis and recording’ scores, and the subconcepts ‘nutrition diagnosis and recording’ and ‘suggestion and coordination of nutritional supplementation’ showed odds ratios (ORs) &lt;1 for the ‘online role-play among students’ experience. In addition, experience with face-to-face simulated patients increased the total scores (OR 2.46, 95% confidence interval 1.43–4.22, <i>p</i> = 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The PNCC scale demonstrated reliability and validity, offering a valuable measure of dietetics students' perceptions of their nutrition care practice competence. The findings highlight the need to increase the willingness of the students to work as dietitians and to incorporate realistic, safe learning experiences beyond on-site practice to enhance nutrition management practice competency.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":54803,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jhn.13409","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

There are currently few appropriate instruments for assessing nutrition care competencies in clinical practice. This study aimed to develop a perceived nutrition care competencies (PNCC) scale for dietetic students and test its validity. Factors that influence PNCC scores were examined through a cross-sectional study.

Methodology

This cross-sectional survey involved 501 dietetic students (mean age of 21.4 years, 428 females) and employed a web-based questionnaire between September 2022 and February 2023. A scale derived from previous research was used to assess nutrition management practices and basic dietetic competencies. Questionnaire data were analysed using exploratory factor analysis.

Results

Exploratory factor analysis identified five factors: nutritional status assessment and preparation for intervention, communication skills for nutritional support, nutritional diagnosis and recording, supplementation suggestions and coordination and dietitian orientation and attitude. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that field practice increased the ‘nutrition diagnosis and recording’ scores, and the subconcepts ‘nutrition diagnosis and recording’ and ‘suggestion and coordination of nutritional supplementation’ showed odds ratios (ORs) <1 for the ‘online role-play among students’ experience. In addition, experience with face-to-face simulated patients increased the total scores (OR 2.46, 95% confidence interval 1.43–4.22, p = 0.001).

Conclusions

The PNCC scale demonstrated reliability and validity, offering a valuable measure of dietetics students' perceptions of their nutrition care practice competence. The findings highlight the need to increase the willingness of the students to work as dietitians and to incorporate realistic, safe learning experiences beyond on-site practice to enhance nutrition management practice competency.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
日本学生营养护理能力量表的发展:一项横断面调查。
背景:目前,用于评估临床实践中营养护理能力的适当工具很少。本研究旨在为营养学专业学生开发一个营养护理能力感知量表(PNCC),并测试其有效性。通过横断面研究对影响 PNCC 分数的因素进行了分析:这项横断面调查涉及 501 名营养学专业学生(平均年龄 21.4 岁,女性 428 人),在 2022 年 9 月至 2023 年 2 月期间采用网络问卷调查。调查采用了先前研究的量表来评估营养管理实践和营养学基本能力。问卷数据采用探索性因素分析法进行分析:探索性因子分析确定了五个因子:营养状况评估和干预准备、营养支持的沟通技巧、营养诊断和记录、补充建议和协调以及营养师的定位和态度。多变量逻辑回归分析表明,现场实践提高了 "营养诊断和记录 "的得分,"营养诊断和记录 "和 "营养补充建议和协调 "这两个子概念显示出了几率比(ORs):PNCC 量表显示了其可靠性和有效性,为测量营养学学生对其营养护理实践能力的看法提供了一个有价值的方法。研究结果突出表明,有必要增强学生作为营养师工作的意愿,并在现场实践之外融入现实、安全的学习体验,以提高营养管理实践能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.20%
发文量
133
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics is an international peer-reviewed journal publishing papers in applied nutrition and dietetics. Papers are therefore welcomed on: - Clinical nutrition and the practice of therapeutic dietetics - Clinical and professional guidelines - Public health nutrition and nutritional epidemiology - Dietary surveys and dietary assessment methodology - Health promotion and intervention studies and their effectiveness - Obesity, weight control and body composition - Research on psychological determinants of healthy and unhealthy eating behaviour. Focus can for example be on attitudes, brain correlates of food reward processing, social influences, impulsivity, cognitive control, cognitive processes, dieting, psychological treatments. - Appetite, Food intake and nutritional status - Nutrigenomics and molecular nutrition - The journal does not publish animal research The journal is published in an online-only format. No printed issue of this title will be produced but authors will still be able to order offprints of their own articles.
期刊最新文献
Dietary Counselling Interventions in Malnutrition Research: Achieving an International Consensus on Best Practices Using an Amended Delphi Process Effectiveness of an Intervention to Prevent Ultra-Processed Foods and Added Sugar in the First Year of Life: A Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial in Brazil Evaluation of a Trauma-Informed Nutrition Curriculum for Women With Children Living in Transitional Housing Socio-Demographic Determinants of Mediterranean Diet Adherence: Results of the EU-National Health Interview Survey (EHIS-3) Ultra-Processed Foods and Dietetic Practice: Findings From a Survey and Focus Group With UK Dietitians
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1