A time-calibrated salamander phylogeny including 765 species and 503 genes.

IF 3.6 1区 生物学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution Pub Date : 2024-12-15 DOI:10.1016/j.ympev.2024.108272
Alexander A Stewart, John J Wiens
{"title":"A time-calibrated salamander phylogeny including 765 species and 503 genes.","authors":"Alexander A Stewart, John J Wiens","doi":"10.1016/j.ympev.2024.108272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent time-calibrated amphibian phylogenies agree on the family-level relationships among extant salamanders but had disparate sampling regimes and inferred very different divergence times. For example, a recent phylogenomic study based on 220 nuclear loci had limited taxon sampling (41 species) and estimated relatively young divergence dates, whereas a more extensive supermatrix study based on 15 genes and 481 species estimated dates that were 22-45 million years older for major clades. Here, we combined phylogenomic and supermatrix approaches to estimate the largest salamander phylogeny to date based on molecular markers. Our matrix contained 765 salamander species and 503 genes (with 92.3% missing data overall). We included 284 more species than the previous largest salamander phylogeny (59% increase) and sampled approximately 93% of all currently described salamander species. Our dating analyses incorporated more than twice as many fossil calibration points within salamanders as previous studies. Maximum-likelihood estimates of tree topology yielded family-level relationships that were consistent with earlier studies. Nearly all species were placed in the expected genera, despite extensive missing data in many species. Bootstrap support was generally high across the tree but was poor in some clades where sampling of genes was limited (e.g., among some bolitoglossine salamanders). The dating analyses yielded age estimates for major clades that were generally intermediate between those from the previous phylogenomic and supermatrix analyses. We also provide a set of 200 time-calibrated trees for use in comparative analyses.</p>","PeriodicalId":56109,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution","volume":" ","pages":"108272"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2024.108272","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent time-calibrated amphibian phylogenies agree on the family-level relationships among extant salamanders but had disparate sampling regimes and inferred very different divergence times. For example, a recent phylogenomic study based on 220 nuclear loci had limited taxon sampling (41 species) and estimated relatively young divergence dates, whereas a more extensive supermatrix study based on 15 genes and 481 species estimated dates that were 22-45 million years older for major clades. Here, we combined phylogenomic and supermatrix approaches to estimate the largest salamander phylogeny to date based on molecular markers. Our matrix contained 765 salamander species and 503 genes (with 92.3% missing data overall). We included 284 more species than the previous largest salamander phylogeny (59% increase) and sampled approximately 93% of all currently described salamander species. Our dating analyses incorporated more than twice as many fossil calibration points within salamanders as previous studies. Maximum-likelihood estimates of tree topology yielded family-level relationships that were consistent with earlier studies. Nearly all species were placed in the expected genera, despite extensive missing data in many species. Bootstrap support was generally high across the tree but was poor in some clades where sampling of genes was limited (e.g., among some bolitoglossine salamanders). The dating analyses yielded age estimates for major clades that were generally intermediate between those from the previous phylogenomic and supermatrix analyses. We also provide a set of 200 time-calibrated trees for use in comparative analyses.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
最近的时间校准两栖动物系统进化论在现存蝾螈的科级关系上达成了一致,但采样机制不同,推断的分化时间也大相径庭。例如,最近一项基于 220 个核基因位点的系统发生组研究对分类群取样有限(41 个物种),估计的分化时间相对较短,而一项基于 15 个基因和 481 个物种的更广泛的超矩阵研究估计的主要支系的分化时间要早 2200-4500 万年。在这里,我们结合了系统发生组和超级矩阵方法,根据分子标记估计了迄今为止最大的蝾螈系统发生。我们的矩阵包含 765 个蝾螈物种和 503 个基因(总体数据缺失率为 92.3%)。与之前最大的蝾螈系统发育相比,我们多包含了 284 个物种(增加了 59%),并对目前描述的所有蝾螈物种中的约 93% 进行了采样。我们的年代分析纳入的蝾螈化石校准点是之前研究的两倍多。对树状拓扑结构的最大似然估计得出的科级关系与之前的研究一致。尽管许多物种的数据缺失严重,但几乎所有物种都被归入了预期的属。整个树的 Bootstrap 支持率普遍较高,但在一些基因取样有限的支系中支持率较低(如一些蝾螈属)。年代分析得出的主要支系的年龄估计值一般介于之前的系统发生学分析和超矩阵分析得出的年龄估计值之间。我们还提供了一组 200 个时间校准树,用于比较分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.30%
发文量
249
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution is dedicated to bringing Darwin''s dream within grasp - to "have fairly true genealogical trees of each great kingdom of Nature." The journal provides a forum for molecular studies that advance our understanding of phylogeny and evolution, further the development of phylogenetically more accurate taxonomic classifications, and ultimately bring a unified classification for all the ramifying lines of life. Phylogeographic studies will be considered for publication if they offer EXCEPTIONAL theoretical or empirical advances.
期刊最新文献
Phylogenomic insights into the taxonomy, ecology, and mating systems of the lorchel family Discinaceae (Pezizales, Ascomycota). Genome-wide analyses provide insights into genetic variation, phylo- and co-phylogenetic relationships, and biogeography of the entomopathogenic nematode genus Heterorhabditis. Retraction notice to "Phylogenomic data exploration with increased sampling provides new insights into the higher-level relationships of butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera)" [Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 197 (2024) 108113]. Phylogenomics yields new systematic and taxonomical insights for Lissotriton newts, a genus with a strong legacy of introgressive hybridization. Plastid-nuclear coevolution of ribosomal protein genes in papilionoid legumes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1