Medication refills do not guarantee medication intake: translation and validation of the Adherence to Refills and Medications Scale in Traditional Chinese among individuals with type 2 diabetes in Taiwan.

Yen-Ming Huang, Tzu Wang, Yu-Meng Yang, Yung-Hsuan Chang, Hsun-Yu Chan, Hsiang-Wen Lin
{"title":"Medication refills do not guarantee medication intake: translation and validation of the Adherence to Refills and Medications Scale in Traditional Chinese among individuals with type 2 diabetes in Taiwan.","authors":"Yen-Ming Huang, Tzu Wang, Yu-Meng Yang, Yung-Hsuan Chang, Hsun-Yu Chan, Hsiang-Wen Lin","doi":"10.1080/00325481.2024.2444258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to translate and validate the Adherence to Refills and Medications Scale into Traditional Chinese (ChARMS-T) and to investigate common barriers to medication adherence among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in Taiwan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The ChARMS-T was developed through translation and application phases. During the translation phase, the scale underwent forward translation, backward translation, and cognitive debriefing. In the application phase, the finalized ChARMS-T was administered to patients with T2D at five Taiwan community pharmacies over eleven months starting in June 2023. Psychometric properties were assessed using criterion validity, construct validity through confirmatory factor analysis, and reliability through McDonald's omega.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 343 participants completed surveys. Factor analysis of the 12-item ChARMS-T revealed two dimensions: medication-taking (8 items) and medication refill (4 items). The instrument demonstrated acceptable internal consistency, with McDonald's omega scores of 0.841 for medication-taking and 0.647 for medication refill. The medication refill subscale showed strong agreement with the objective refill measure, proportion of days covered, with a coefficient of 0.84, suggesting that these measures evaluate similar constructs. Evidence of known-groups validity was demonstrated by a significant difference between ChARMS-T scores and glycemic control (<i>p</i> = 0.047). Patients with good glycemic control had a significantly higher adherence rate to both refills and medication-taking compared to those with poor glycemic control. The most frequently reported barriers to medication-taking were carelessness (55.7%), forgetfulness (54.8%), and frequent dosing intervals (43.1%). For medication refills, 9.6% of the participants identified a lack of planning as the main reason for not refilling their diabetes medications on time, followed by forgetfulness (7.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ChARMS-T identified a broader range of non-adherence reasons and demonstrated good psychometric properties. It can be integrated into practice settings for screening and follow-up to enhance medication adherence through effective communication between healthcare professionals and patients, ultimately improving long-term patient health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94176,"journal":{"name":"Postgraduate medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postgraduate medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00325481.2024.2444258","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to translate and validate the Adherence to Refills and Medications Scale into Traditional Chinese (ChARMS-T) and to investigate common barriers to medication adherence among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in Taiwan.

Methods: The ChARMS-T was developed through translation and application phases. During the translation phase, the scale underwent forward translation, backward translation, and cognitive debriefing. In the application phase, the finalized ChARMS-T was administered to patients with T2D at five Taiwan community pharmacies over eleven months starting in June 2023. Psychometric properties were assessed using criterion validity, construct validity through confirmatory factor analysis, and reliability through McDonald's omega.

Results: A total of 343 participants completed surveys. Factor analysis of the 12-item ChARMS-T revealed two dimensions: medication-taking (8 items) and medication refill (4 items). The instrument demonstrated acceptable internal consistency, with McDonald's omega scores of 0.841 for medication-taking and 0.647 for medication refill. The medication refill subscale showed strong agreement with the objective refill measure, proportion of days covered, with a coefficient of 0.84, suggesting that these measures evaluate similar constructs. Evidence of known-groups validity was demonstrated by a significant difference between ChARMS-T scores and glycemic control (p = 0.047). Patients with good glycemic control had a significantly higher adherence rate to both refills and medication-taking compared to those with poor glycemic control. The most frequently reported barriers to medication-taking were carelessness (55.7%), forgetfulness (54.8%), and frequent dosing intervals (43.1%). For medication refills, 9.6% of the participants identified a lack of planning as the main reason for not refilling their diabetes medications on time, followed by forgetfulness (7.6%).

Conclusions: The ChARMS-T identified a broader range of non-adherence reasons and demonstrated good psychometric properties. It can be integrated into practice settings for screening and follow-up to enhance medication adherence through effective communication between healthcare professionals and patients, ultimately improving long-term patient health outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
补药不能保证服药量:台湾 2 型糖尿病患者补药和服药依从性量表的繁体中文翻译和验证。
研究目的本研究旨在翻译并验证台湾2型糖尿病(T2D)患者用药依从性量表(ChARMS-T)的繁体中文版,并调查台湾2型糖尿病(T2D)患者用药依从性的常见障碍:方法:ChARMS-T的开发分为翻译和应用两个阶段。在翻译阶段,量表经过了正译、反译和认知汇报。在应用阶段,从 2023 年 9 月开始,对台湾 5 家社区药房的 T2D 患者进行了为期 9 个月的 ChARMS-T 测试。通过标准效度评估心理测量特性,通过确认性因素分析评估建构效度,通过麦当劳欧米茄分析评估信度:共有 343 名参与者完成了调查。对 12 个项目的 ChARMS-T 进行因子分析后发现了两个维度:服药(8 个项目)和补药(4 个项目)。该工具的内部一致性尚可接受,服药量表的麦克唐纳Ω分值为 0.841,再服药量表的麦克唐纳Ω分值为 0.647。重新配药子量表与客观的重新配药测量--覆盖天数比例--显示出很强的一致性,系数为 0.84,表明这些测量评估的是相似的结构。ChARMS-T 评分与血糖控制之间的显著差异(p = 0.047)证明了已知组的有效性。与血糖控制不佳的患者相比,血糖控制良好的患者对补药和服药的依从性明显更高。最常报告的服药障碍是粗心大意(55.7%)、健忘(54.8%)和服药间隔频繁(43.1%)。在补药方面,9.6%的参与者认为,缺乏计划性是没有按时补药的主要原因,其次是健忘(7.6%):结论:ChARMS-T 能识别出更多不坚持服药的原因,并显示出良好的心理测量特性。结论:ChARMS-T 能识别出更多不坚持服药的原因,并显示出良好的心理测量特性,可将其纳入实践环境中进行筛查和随访,通过医护人员与患者之间的有效沟通来提高患者的服药依从性,最终改善患者的长期健康状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of low-dose aspirin on the prevalence of anemia in elderly patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgical intervention for patients with fibrinopurulent pleural empyema and acute respiratory failure: a case report. Trends of primary health care practitioners toward bleeding management in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional analysis. Quality of guidelines for hyperthyroidism: systematic quality assessment using the AGREE II tool. A review of venous thromboembolism for the hospitalist.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1