Upper Bounds of Uncertainty for Dempster Combination Rule-Based Evidence Fusion Systems

IF 8.6 1区 计算机科学 Q1 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS IEEE Transactions on Systems Man Cybernetics-Systems Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1109/TSMC.2024.3491317
Xinyang Deng;Wen Jiang
{"title":"Upper Bounds of Uncertainty for Dempster Combination Rule-Based Evidence Fusion Systems","authors":"Xinyang Deng;Wen Jiang","doi":"10.1109/TSMC.2024.3491317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Quantifying the epistemic uncertainty for static information and dynamic fusion or reasoning processes is still unsolved for various epistemic uncertainty theories. This study focuses on the Dempster-Shafer evidence theory, which is of great ability in representing and fusing uncertain information with imprecision and ignorance on the basis of basic probability assignment (BPA) and Dempster combination rule (DCR). In order to effectively measure and infer the epistemic uncertainty for both static BPAs and dynamic fusion processes, a solution based on plausibility entropy is proposed in this study. At first, four new properties, called grouping, splitting, weighted additivity, and weighted subadditivity, are proved for the first time in this study to strengthen the theoretical foundation of plausibility entropy in measuring the uncertainty associated with a given BPA. Second, the upper bounds of uncertainty are derived for typical BPA-based multisource information fusion systems, including standard DCR, weighted DCR, discounted DCR fusion systems for evidence defined on the same frame of discernment (FOD), and the DCR fusion system for evidence defined on multiple distinct FODs. Several examples are given to illustrate these results.","PeriodicalId":48915,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Systems Man Cybernetics-Systems","volume":"55 1","pages":"817-828"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Systems Man Cybernetics-Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10756205/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Quantifying the epistemic uncertainty for static information and dynamic fusion or reasoning processes is still unsolved for various epistemic uncertainty theories. This study focuses on the Dempster-Shafer evidence theory, which is of great ability in representing and fusing uncertain information with imprecision and ignorance on the basis of basic probability assignment (BPA) and Dempster combination rule (DCR). In order to effectively measure and infer the epistemic uncertainty for both static BPAs and dynamic fusion processes, a solution based on plausibility entropy is proposed in this study. At first, four new properties, called grouping, splitting, weighted additivity, and weighted subadditivity, are proved for the first time in this study to strengthen the theoretical foundation of plausibility entropy in measuring the uncertainty associated with a given BPA. Second, the upper bounds of uncertainty are derived for typical BPA-based multisource information fusion systems, including standard DCR, weighted DCR, discounted DCR fusion systems for evidence defined on the same frame of discernment (FOD), and the DCR fusion system for evidence defined on multiple distinct FODs. Several examples are given to illustrate these results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于Dempster组合规则的证据融合系统的不确定性上界
对静态信息和动态融合或推理过程的认知不确定性进行量化是各种认知不确定性理论尚未解决的问题。Dempster- shafer证据理论在基本概率分配(BPA)和Dempster组合规则(DCR)的基础上,对具有不精确和无知的不确定信息具有较强的表征和融合能力。为了有效地测量和推断静态双酚a和动态融合过程的认知不确定性,本研究提出了一种基于似然熵的解决方案。首先,本文首次证明了分组、分裂、加权可加性和加权次可加性四个新性质,加强了可信性熵测量BPA不确定性的理论基础。其次,推导了典型的基于双酚a的多源信息融合系统的不确定性上界,包括基于同一识别框架的标准DCR、加权DCR、折扣DCR融合系统以及基于多个不同识别框架的DCR融合系统。给出了几个例子来说明这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Systems Man Cybernetics-Systems
IEEE Transactions on Systems Man Cybernetics-Systems AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS-COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS
CiteScore
18.50
自引率
11.50%
发文量
812
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems encompasses the fields of systems engineering, covering issue formulation, analysis, and modeling throughout the systems engineering lifecycle phases. It addresses decision-making, issue interpretation, systems management, processes, and various methods such as optimization, modeling, and simulation in the development and deployment of large systems.
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Table of Contents IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems Information for Authors IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems Information for Authors IEEE Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Society Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1