The road to best practices in body donation

IF 5.2 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Anatomical Sciences Education Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1002/ase.2539
Joy Y. Balta, Thomas H. Champney, Christopher Ferrigno, Laura E. Johnson, Callum F. Ross, Brandi Schmitt, Heather F. Smith
{"title":"The road to best practices in body donation","authors":"Joy Y. Balta,&nbsp;Thomas H. Champney,&nbsp;Christopher Ferrigno,&nbsp;Laura E. Johnson,&nbsp;Callum F. Ross,&nbsp;Brandi Schmitt,&nbsp;Heather F. Smith","doi":"10.1002/ase.2539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The American Association for Anatomy convened a task force to create a best practices and recommendations document for human body donation, addressing a critical need for standardized guidelines in this area. The task force included members with specialized expertise in procedural and ethical aspects of body donation programs. Their aim was to ensure that the process of body donation adheres to the highest ethical standards, protecting both the dignity of donors and the integrity of the programs that receive them. This document represents the first comprehensive guide to ethical best practices in working with body donors, offering clear and actionable recommendations for professionals in the field. In this viewpoint article, JYB, Chair of the Human Body Donation Committee, provides a summary of how these guidelines were developed, covering the various procedural and ethical considerations. The Q&amp;A format of the article further explains the document's key areas and its impact on future practices.</p><p>The American Association for Anatomy was lacking a comprehensive document with best practice recommendations. The organization had a list of resources and a few policies—but no detailed guidelines. This may be the first of its kind—a comprehensive document that aligns best practices and recommendations for body donation.</p><p>The Human Body Donation Committee (HBDC) thought it would be helpful to create this because, in the United States, there's not much oversight—legal, federal, or state—in most places. It is really up to the body donation programs to do what they think is best for the donors. As anatomists and body donation program professionals, we have a responsibility to ensure we are promoting best practices and ethical ways of working with donors. Donors trust us with their bodies and expect us to act in their best interest after they pass.</p><p>The process to generate the best practice document took many years and was quite complicated. Initially, the American Association for Anatomy created a task force to respond to legislative bills and media requests. As the task force discovered a big gap between what guidelines were available versus what was needed, the task force advocated for many years to establish a committee. Once approved, one of our jobs was to create these best practices.</p><p>We spent a lot of time discussing and developing definitions and terms, which was challenging but necessary to ensure understanding and consistency. We then created a table of contents, which was first presented to the AAA Board, and then to the membership at the 2023 anatomy meeting, during which we requested and gathered feedback on what the AAA membership wanted to see included in the document.</p><p>Different teams of HBDC members drafted sections, shared among the whole committee and we held meetings to discuss. Once we had a comprehensive draft, we sent it to the Board for feedback, made changes based on their input, and then opened it for membership feedback again. This way, it wasn't just the task force's input but also the entire American Association for Anatomy.</p><p>After these rounds of feedback, our Internal Affairs Subcommittee made the final changes and brought them to the larger committee for approval. The AAA Board then gave their approval. Our last step was to go through the submission process with ASE where peer reviewers made impactful contributions to the document. All contributions are acknowledged in the document. To summarize, the process was lengthy and involved a large number of individuals and the entire membership of the American Association for Anatomy.</p><p>We aimed for this document to be as comprehensive as possible. The law, specifically the Uniform Anatomical Gift Act, generally allows a donation to be made and how to do so, but not much else. We therefore wanted to provide recommendations and best practices for the entire body donation process.</p><p>The document includes best practices for everything from setting up policies, financial modeling for the body donation program and establishing an oversight committee through to obtaining consent, working with donors, technical operations, and donor memorialization.</p><p>There's also a human element—staffing. We discuss the best ways to train individuals and ensure they are up-to-date on best practices. We address end users, whether they are academics, researchers, or clinicians, and outline the best ways to inform them about best practices that emphasize uses, conduct and terminology.</p><p>We also address the disposition of bodies, such as cremation, and how to bring the process full circle by acknowledging donors through services or memorials.</p><p>These are the key areas we covered, each with multiple sections and considerations for working with donors.</p><p>The best practices document starts with the ethical premise that donors are consenting individuals who are trusting us with the stewardship of their bodies. The document emphasizes that it is our responsibility to treat the donors with respect and honor, and to teach others to do the same. We also emphasize a transparent process and a contemporary view on how body donors contribute to education and research.</p><p>All the individuals who contributed to this document were either directors of body donation programs, faculty with donor program responsibilities, or researchers. For example, in the Balta Lab, there is a PhD student and three master's students whose research contributed to this document. The document is the result of both experience and research with many professionals sharing their expertise. It is based on evidence and is meant for everyone working with donors to consider.</p><p>From the perspective of an educator who is not running a human body donation program, it is our ethical responsibility to ask where the bodies come from and to be familiar with the consent they have given. It is important not just for those running body donation programs, but also for those utilizing donors to educate the next generation of healthcare workers.</p><p>We also include students in this as well, since it can be challenging for them to enter the lab. One of the main things we tell them to help process this experience of dealing with death for the first time is that they are not doing anything wrong. It is helpful for students to know that these individuals donated their bodies for them to learn. This knowledge helps students process their emotions and the triggering feelings they may have in the lab. So, it is very important for students, educators, and even donors to see that we are doing a lot to protect them after they pass.</p><p>\n \n <i>Human body donation programs best practices and recommended standards: A task force report from the American Association for Anatomy</i>\n \n </p><p><b>Joy Y. Balta:</b> Conceptualization; writing – review and editing; writing – original draft. <b>Thomas H. Champney:</b> Writing – review and editing; writing – original draft. <b>Christopher Ferrigno:</b> Writing – original draft; writing – review and editing. <b>Laura E. Johnson:</b> Writing – original draft; writing – review and editing. <b>Callum F. Ross:</b> Writing – original draft; writing – review and editing. <b>Brandi Schmitt:</b> Writing – original draft; writing – review and editing. <b>Heather F. Smith:</b> Writing – original draft; writing – review and editing.</p>","PeriodicalId":124,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Sciences Education","volume":"18 1","pages":"5-7"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11669070/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anatomical Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ase.2539","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The American Association for Anatomy convened a task force to create a best practices and recommendations document for human body donation, addressing a critical need for standardized guidelines in this area. The task force included members with specialized expertise in procedural and ethical aspects of body donation programs. Their aim was to ensure that the process of body donation adheres to the highest ethical standards, protecting both the dignity of donors and the integrity of the programs that receive them. This document represents the first comprehensive guide to ethical best practices in working with body donors, offering clear and actionable recommendations for professionals in the field. In this viewpoint article, JYB, Chair of the Human Body Donation Committee, provides a summary of how these guidelines were developed, covering the various procedural and ethical considerations. The Q&A format of the article further explains the document's key areas and its impact on future practices.

The American Association for Anatomy was lacking a comprehensive document with best practice recommendations. The organization had a list of resources and a few policies—but no detailed guidelines. This may be the first of its kind—a comprehensive document that aligns best practices and recommendations for body donation.

The Human Body Donation Committee (HBDC) thought it would be helpful to create this because, in the United States, there's not much oversight—legal, federal, or state—in most places. It is really up to the body donation programs to do what they think is best for the donors. As anatomists and body donation program professionals, we have a responsibility to ensure we are promoting best practices and ethical ways of working with donors. Donors trust us with their bodies and expect us to act in their best interest after they pass.

The process to generate the best practice document took many years and was quite complicated. Initially, the American Association for Anatomy created a task force to respond to legislative bills and media requests. As the task force discovered a big gap between what guidelines were available versus what was needed, the task force advocated for many years to establish a committee. Once approved, one of our jobs was to create these best practices.

We spent a lot of time discussing and developing definitions and terms, which was challenging but necessary to ensure understanding and consistency. We then created a table of contents, which was first presented to the AAA Board, and then to the membership at the 2023 anatomy meeting, during which we requested and gathered feedback on what the AAA membership wanted to see included in the document.

Different teams of HBDC members drafted sections, shared among the whole committee and we held meetings to discuss. Once we had a comprehensive draft, we sent it to the Board for feedback, made changes based on their input, and then opened it for membership feedback again. This way, it wasn't just the task force's input but also the entire American Association for Anatomy.

After these rounds of feedback, our Internal Affairs Subcommittee made the final changes and brought them to the larger committee for approval. The AAA Board then gave their approval. Our last step was to go through the submission process with ASE where peer reviewers made impactful contributions to the document. All contributions are acknowledged in the document. To summarize, the process was lengthy and involved a large number of individuals and the entire membership of the American Association for Anatomy.

We aimed for this document to be as comprehensive as possible. The law, specifically the Uniform Anatomical Gift Act, generally allows a donation to be made and how to do so, but not much else. We therefore wanted to provide recommendations and best practices for the entire body donation process.

The document includes best practices for everything from setting up policies, financial modeling for the body donation program and establishing an oversight committee through to obtaining consent, working with donors, technical operations, and donor memorialization.

There's also a human element—staffing. We discuss the best ways to train individuals and ensure they are up-to-date on best practices. We address end users, whether they are academics, researchers, or clinicians, and outline the best ways to inform them about best practices that emphasize uses, conduct and terminology.

We also address the disposition of bodies, such as cremation, and how to bring the process full circle by acknowledging donors through services or memorials.

These are the key areas we covered, each with multiple sections and considerations for working with donors.

The best practices document starts with the ethical premise that donors are consenting individuals who are trusting us with the stewardship of their bodies. The document emphasizes that it is our responsibility to treat the donors with respect and honor, and to teach others to do the same. We also emphasize a transparent process and a contemporary view on how body donors contribute to education and research.

All the individuals who contributed to this document were either directors of body donation programs, faculty with donor program responsibilities, or researchers. For example, in the Balta Lab, there is a PhD student and three master's students whose research contributed to this document. The document is the result of both experience and research with many professionals sharing their expertise. It is based on evidence and is meant for everyone working with donors to consider.

From the perspective of an educator who is not running a human body donation program, it is our ethical responsibility to ask where the bodies come from and to be familiar with the consent they have given. It is important not just for those running body donation programs, but also for those utilizing donors to educate the next generation of healthcare workers.

We also include students in this as well, since it can be challenging for them to enter the lab. One of the main things we tell them to help process this experience of dealing with death for the first time is that they are not doing anything wrong. It is helpful for students to know that these individuals donated their bodies for them to learn. This knowledge helps students process their emotions and the triggering feelings they may have in the lab. So, it is very important for students, educators, and even donors to see that we are doing a lot to protect them after they pass.

Human body donation programs best practices and recommended standards: A task force report from the American Association for Anatomy

Joy Y. Balta: Conceptualization; writing – review and editing; writing – original draft. Thomas H. Champney: Writing – review and editing; writing – original draft. Christopher Ferrigno: Writing – original draft; writing – review and editing. Laura E. Johnson: Writing – original draft; writing – review and editing. Callum F. Ross: Writing – original draft; writing – review and editing. Brandi Schmitt: Writing – original draft; writing – review and editing. Heather F. Smith: Writing – original draft; writing – review and editing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通往遗体捐献最佳实践之路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anatomical Sciences Education
Anatomical Sciences Education Anatomy/education-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
39.70%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: Anatomical Sciences Education, affiliated with the American Association for Anatomy, serves as an international platform for sharing ideas, innovations, and research related to education in anatomical sciences. Covering gross anatomy, embryology, histology, and neurosciences, the journal addresses education at various levels, including undergraduate, graduate, post-graduate, allied health, medical (both allopathic and osteopathic), and dental. It fosters collaboration and discussion in the field of anatomical sciences education.
期刊最新文献
Naked eye three-dimensional teaching assistant system applied to undergraduate medical imaging education: A pilot study. Supporting minority cultures during initial engagements with body donors in the dissecting room: A pilot study exploring perspectives of Pasifika medical students around culture and cultural safety. Beyond the blade: Unveiling the nexus of spirituality and human dissection among medical and allied health students in Nigeria. Exploring perceptions of alternative assessment and grading in graduate anatomy education. Evaluation of the effectiveness of a digital escape room for learning veterinary anatomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1