Arian Arjomandi Rad, Sebastian Streukens, Jindra Vainer, Thanos Athanasiou, Jos Maessen, Peyman Sardari Nia
{"title":"The current state of the multidisciplinary heart team approach: a systematic review.","authors":"Arian Arjomandi Rad, Sebastian Streukens, Jindra Vainer, Thanos Athanasiou, Jos Maessen, Peyman Sardari Nia","doi":"10.1093/ejcts/ezae461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The heart team (HT) approach, recommended for managing cardiovascular diseases, emphasizes multidisciplinary collaboration. Despite its potential benefits, evidence on its effectiveness and implementation is varied and sparse. This review assesses the HT approach's impact on patient outcomes and care delivery in cardiovascular care. A systematic review was conducted across MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane and Google Scholar up to July 2023, focusing on studies that implemented an HT approach in coronary and heart valve disease management. Exclusion criteria included non-human studies, case reports and studies not focusing on HT outcomes. From 6270 identified articles, 20 met the inclusion criteria. These studies demonstrated significant variability in HT composition and organization, coupled with a lack of standardized metrics for evaluating clinical outcomes and the impact of the HT. Significant variability was observed in HT composition, with 13 of the 20 studies did not utilize structured templates, those that did demonstrated more consistent decision-making. In mitral valve interventions, HTs were linked to reduced in-hospital mortality and improved long-term survival (5-year survival probability of 0.74 vs 0.70, P = 0.04). In aortic valve interventions, 80% of patients underwent tailored valve procedures following HT evaluation. The HT approach in cardiovascular care demonstrates improved patient outcomes, particularly in specialized interventions for mitral and aortic valve diseases and coronary artery disease management. Despite these positive findings, the variability in HT implementation and the need for standardized outcome metrics call for further advances to optimize this collaborative care model.</p>","PeriodicalId":11938,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11754862/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezae461","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The heart team (HT) approach, recommended for managing cardiovascular diseases, emphasizes multidisciplinary collaboration. Despite its potential benefits, evidence on its effectiveness and implementation is varied and sparse. This review assesses the HT approach's impact on patient outcomes and care delivery in cardiovascular care. A systematic review was conducted across MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane and Google Scholar up to July 2023, focusing on studies that implemented an HT approach in coronary and heart valve disease management. Exclusion criteria included non-human studies, case reports and studies not focusing on HT outcomes. From 6270 identified articles, 20 met the inclusion criteria. These studies demonstrated significant variability in HT composition and organization, coupled with a lack of standardized metrics for evaluating clinical outcomes and the impact of the HT. Significant variability was observed in HT composition, with 13 of the 20 studies did not utilize structured templates, those that did demonstrated more consistent decision-making. In mitral valve interventions, HTs were linked to reduced in-hospital mortality and improved long-term survival (5-year survival probability of 0.74 vs 0.70, P = 0.04). In aortic valve interventions, 80% of patients underwent tailored valve procedures following HT evaluation. The HT approach in cardiovascular care demonstrates improved patient outcomes, particularly in specialized interventions for mitral and aortic valve diseases and coronary artery disease management. Despite these positive findings, the variability in HT implementation and the need for standardized outcome metrics call for further advances to optimize this collaborative care model.
背景:心脏小组(HT)方法,推荐用于管理心血管疾病(cvd),强调多学科合作。尽管它有潜在的好处,但关于其有效性和实施的证据多种多样,而且很少。本综述评估了HT方法对心血管护理患者预后和护理交付的影响。方法:截至2023年7月,对MEDLINE、EMBASE、PubMed、Cochrane和谷歌Scholar进行系统综述,重点关注在冠状动脉和心脏瓣膜疾病管理中实施HT方法的研究。排除标准包括非人类研究、病例报告和不关注HT结果的研究。结果:6270篇文献中,20篇符合纳入标准。这些研究表明,激素的组成和组织存在显著的可变性,同时缺乏评估临床结果和激素影响的标准化指标。在HT组成中观察到显著的可变性,20项研究中有13项没有使用结构化模板,而那些使用结构化模板的研究显示出更一致的决策。在二尖瓣干预中,HTs与降低住院死亡率和提高长期生存率相关(5年生存率为0.74 vs 0.70, p = 0.04)。在主动脉瓣干预中,80%的患者在HT评估后接受了量身定制的瓣膜手术。结论:HT方法在心血管护理中改善了患者的预后,特别是在二尖瓣和主动脉瓣疾病和CAD管理的专门干预方面。尽管有这些积极的发现,但HT实施的可变性和对标准化结果指标的需求要求进一步改进以优化这种协作护理模式。
期刊介绍:
The primary aim of the European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery is to provide a medium for the publication of high-quality original scientific reports documenting progress in cardiac and thoracic surgery. The journal publishes reports of significant clinical and experimental advances related to surgery of the heart, the great vessels and the chest. The European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery is an international journal and accepts submissions from all regions. The journal is supported by a number of leading European societies.