Safety and Efficacy of Two Ultrathin Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents in Real-World Practice: Genoss DES Stents Versus Orsiro Stents From a Prospective Registry
Ho Sung Jeon, Young Jin Youn, Jung-Hee Lee, Young Jun Park, Jung-Woo Son, Jun-Won Lee, Min-Soo Ahn, Sung Gyun Ahn, Jang-Young Kim, Byung-Su Yoo, Junghan Yoon
{"title":"Safety and Efficacy of Two Ultrathin Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents in Real-World Practice: Genoss DES Stents Versus Orsiro Stents From a Prospective Registry","authors":"Ho Sung Jeon, Young Jin Youn, Jung-Hee Lee, Young Jun Park, Jung-Woo Son, Jun-Won Lee, Min-Soo Ahn, Sung Gyun Ahn, Jang-Young Kim, Byung-Su Yoo, Junghan Yoon","doi":"10.1002/clc.70060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The Orsiro and Genoss DES stents are biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents (DESs) with ultrathin struts.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To investigate the safety and efficacy of these two ultrathin DESs in real-world practice.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>From a single-center prospective registry, we included 751 and 931 patients treated with the Genoss DES and Orsiro stents, respectively. After propensity score matching, we compared 483 patients in each group with respect to a device-oriented composite outcome (DOCO), which comprised cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization up to 2 follow-up years.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>After propensity score matching, there were no significant between-group differences in clinical and angiographic characteristics. During the median follow-up period of 730 days (interquartile range, 427–730 days), there was no significant between-group difference in the DOCO rate (3.1% in the Genoss DES group vs. 2.9% in the Orsiro group, log-rank <i>p</i> = 0.847).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This study demonstrated comparable safety and efficacy between the Orsiro and Genoss DES stents during a 2-year follow-up period in real-world practice. However, this result should be confirmed in a large randomized controlled trial.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Trial Registration</h3>\n \n <p>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02038127.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10201,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cardiology","volume":"47 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/clc.70060","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clc.70060","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
The Orsiro and Genoss DES stents are biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents (DESs) with ultrathin struts.
Objective
To investigate the safety and efficacy of these two ultrathin DESs in real-world practice.
Methods
From a single-center prospective registry, we included 751 and 931 patients treated with the Genoss DES and Orsiro stents, respectively. After propensity score matching, we compared 483 patients in each group with respect to a device-oriented composite outcome (DOCO), which comprised cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization up to 2 follow-up years.
Results
After propensity score matching, there were no significant between-group differences in clinical and angiographic characteristics. During the median follow-up period of 730 days (interquartile range, 427–730 days), there was no significant between-group difference in the DOCO rate (3.1% in the Genoss DES group vs. 2.9% in the Orsiro group, log-rank p = 0.847).
Conclusions
This study demonstrated comparable safety and efficacy between the Orsiro and Genoss DES stents during a 2-year follow-up period in real-world practice. However, this result should be confirmed in a large randomized controlled trial.
背景:Orsiro和geness DES支架是具有超薄支架的可生物降解聚合物药物洗脱支架(DESs)。目的:探讨两种超薄DESs在实际应用中的安全性和有效性。方法:从单中心前瞻性登记中,我们分别纳入了751例和931例接受geness DES和Orsiro支架治疗的患者。在倾向评分匹配后,我们比较了每组483例患者的器械导向复合结局(DOCO),包括心脏性死亡、靶血管心肌梗死和临床指示的靶病变血运重建术,随访时间长达2年。结果:倾向评分匹配后,两组患者的临床和血管造影特征无显著差异。在中位随访期730天(四分位间距427-730天),DOCO率组间无显著差异(geness DES组3.1% vs Orsiro组2.9%,log-rank p = 0.847)。结论:该研究在现实世界实践的2年随访期间证明Orsiro和geness DES支架的安全性和有效性相当。然而,这一结果需要在大型随机对照试验中得到证实。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT02038127。
期刊介绍:
Clinical Cardiology provides a fully Gold Open Access forum for the publication of original clinical research, as well as brief reviews of diagnostic and therapeutic issues in cardiovascular medicine and cardiovascular surgery.
The journal includes Clinical Investigations, Reviews, free standing editorials and commentaries, and bonus online-only content.
The journal also publishes supplements, Expert Panel Discussions, sponsored clinical Reviews, Trial Designs, and Quality and Outcomes.