Interference of titanium and zirconia implants on dental-dedicated magnetic resonance image quality: ex vivo and in vivo assessment.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Dento maxillo facial radiology Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1093/dmfr/twae071
K M Johannsen, J Christensen, L H Matzen, B Hansen, R Spin-Neto
{"title":"Interference of titanium and zirconia implants on dental-dedicated magnetic resonance image quality: ex vivo and in vivo assessment.","authors":"K M Johannsen, J Christensen, L H Matzen, B Hansen, R Spin-Neto","doi":"10.1093/dmfr/twae071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the impact of titanium and zirconia implants on dental-dedicated MR image (ddMRI) quality ex vivo (magnetic field distortion, MFD) and in vivo (artefacts).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>ddMR images were acquired (MAGNETOM Free.Max, 0.55 T, Siemens Healthineers AG, Forchheim, Germany) using a dental-dedicated coil (Rapid Biomedical, Rimpar Germany). Ex vivo: three phantoms were manufactured: one agar-embedded titanium implant, one agar-embedded zirconia implant, and one control phantom (agar 1.5%). Field-map analysis of images acquired at 0.55 T, 1.5 T and 3.0 T (MAGNETOM Sola and MAGNETOM Lumina, respectively, Siemens Healthineers AG, Forchheim, Germany) was done to illustrate the extent and severity of MFD caused by the implants. In vivo (0.55 T only): a splint was designed to serve as implant carrier allowing diverse implant positions (0, 1, 2, or 5 implants). A volunteer was imaged using multiple pulse sequences. Three blinded observers scored the images twice for the presence, severity, and type of artefacts, illustrated by descriptive statistics and inter- and intra-observer reproducibility (kappa statistics).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ex vivo: titanium produced more severe MFD than zirconia. MFD extent and amplitude increased with field strength (0.55 T < 1.5 T < 3.0 T). In vivo: titanium produced more artefacts than zirconia, generally as signal voids in tooth crowns close to implants. Inter- and intra-observer reproducibility ranged from 0.28-0.64, and 0.32-0.57, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prevalence of artefacts increased with magnetic field strength. Titanium generated larger MFD than zirconia. For both materials, artefacts were visible mainly in the crown area. Observer reproducibility needs improvement by dedicated ddMRI training.</p>","PeriodicalId":11261,"journal":{"name":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dmfr/twae071","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To assess the impact of titanium and zirconia implants on dental-dedicated MR image (ddMRI) quality ex vivo (magnetic field distortion, MFD) and in vivo (artefacts).

Material and methods: ddMR images were acquired (MAGNETOM Free.Max, 0.55 T, Siemens Healthineers AG, Forchheim, Germany) using a dental-dedicated coil (Rapid Biomedical, Rimpar Germany). Ex vivo: three phantoms were manufactured: one agar-embedded titanium implant, one agar-embedded zirconia implant, and one control phantom (agar 1.5%). Field-map analysis of images acquired at 0.55 T, 1.5 T and 3.0 T (MAGNETOM Sola and MAGNETOM Lumina, respectively, Siemens Healthineers AG, Forchheim, Germany) was done to illustrate the extent and severity of MFD caused by the implants. In vivo (0.55 T only): a splint was designed to serve as implant carrier allowing diverse implant positions (0, 1, 2, or 5 implants). A volunteer was imaged using multiple pulse sequences. Three blinded observers scored the images twice for the presence, severity, and type of artefacts, illustrated by descriptive statistics and inter- and intra-observer reproducibility (kappa statistics).

Results: Ex vivo: titanium produced more severe MFD than zirconia. MFD extent and amplitude increased with field strength (0.55 T < 1.5 T < 3.0 T). In vivo: titanium produced more artefacts than zirconia, generally as signal voids in tooth crowns close to implants. Inter- and intra-observer reproducibility ranged from 0.28-0.64, and 0.32-0.57, respectively.

Conclusion: The prevalence of artefacts increased with magnetic field strength. Titanium generated larger MFD than zirconia. For both materials, artefacts were visible mainly in the crown area. Observer reproducibility needs improvement by dedicated ddMRI training.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
钛和氧化锆种植体对牙科专用磁共振图像质量的干扰:离体和体内评估。
目的:评价钛和氧化锆种植体对牙体专用磁共振成像(ddMRI)质量的影响(体外(磁场畸变,MFD)和体内(伪影)。材料和方法:ddMR图像采集(MAGNETOM Free)。Max, 0.55 T, Siemens Healthineers AG, Forchheim, Germany),使用牙科专用线圈(Rapid Biomedical, Rimpar Germany)。离体:制作3个假体:一个琼脂包埋钛假体,一个琼脂包埋氧化锆假体,一个对照假体(琼脂1.5%)。对在0.55 T、1.5 T和3.0 T(分别为MAGNETOM Sola和MAGNETOM Lumina, Siemens Healthineers AG, Forchheim, Germany)获取的图像进行场图分析,以说明由植入物引起的MFD的程度和严重程度。在体内(仅限0.55 T):夹板被设计用作种植体载体,允许不同的种植体位置(0、1、2或5个种植体)。一名志愿者使用多个脉冲序列成像。三名盲法观察者对图像的存在、严重程度和伪影类型进行两次评分,通过描述性统计和观察者之间和观察者内部的再现性(kappa统计)来说明。结果:体外:钛比氧化锆产生更严重的MFD。结论:伪影的发生率随磁场强度的增加而增加。钛产生的MFD比氧化锆大。对于这两种材料,人工制品主要在冠区可见。观察者的再现性需要通过专门的ddMRI训练来提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
65
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (DMFR) is the journal of the International Association of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (IADMFR) and covers the closely related fields of oral radiology and head and neck imaging. Established in 1972, DMFR is a key resource keeping dentists, radiologists and clinicians and scientists with an interest in Head and Neck imaging abreast of important research and developments in oral and maxillofacial radiology. The DMFR editorial board features a panel of international experts including Editor-in-Chief Professor Ralf Schulze. Our editorial board provide their expertise and guidance in shaping the content and direction of the journal. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor - 1.919 - Receipt to first decision - average of 3 weeks - Acceptance to online publication - average of 3 weeks - Open access option - ISSN: 0250-832X - eISSN: 1476-542X
期刊最新文献
Enhancing panoramic dental imaging with AI-driven arch surface fitting: Achieving improved clarity and accuracy through an optimal reconstruction zone. Investigation of the effect of thyroid collar, radiation safety glasses and lead apron on radiation dose in cone beam computed tomography. Methods for assessing peri-implant marginal bone levels on digital periapical radiographs: a meta-research. Utility of the radiological report function of an artificial intelligence system in interpreting CBCT images: a technical report. Assessment of the Quality of Root Canal Fillings-An Ex-Vivo Comparison of CBCT Scans, Conventional Intraoral Sensors, and a Novel Photon-Counting Sensor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1