Evaluating the perioperative risks in esophageal resection and reconstruction for esophageal carcinoma among elderly patients: A retrospective propensity score matching analysis.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Ejso Pub Date : 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2024.109542
Ji Yong Kim, Jae Kwang Yun, Hyeong Ryul Kim, Seung-Il Park, Yong-Hee Kim
{"title":"Evaluating the perioperative risks in esophageal resection and reconstruction for esophageal carcinoma among elderly patients: A retrospective propensity score matching analysis.","authors":"Ji Yong Kim, Jae Kwang Yun, Hyeong Ryul Kim, Seung-Il Park, Yong-Hee Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.ejso.2024.109542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>With the global aging, the number of elderly candidates for esophageal resection is increasing. However, studies on esophagectomy in elderly patients have yielded conflicting results, and individuals over 75 years old are frequently excluded from studies on esophageal cancer. This study aimed to analyze perioperative and survival outcomes post-esophagectomy in elderly patients using propensity score matching (PSM).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients with esophageal carcinoma who underwent esophagectomy (2006-2020) were studied. A 1:2 PSM was performed, with matching variables, including operational approach, type of operation, Charlson Comorbidity Index without age score, clinical stage, and treatment modality. Perioperative and survival outcomes were compared between the age groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After PSM, 91 elderly and 182 non-elderly patients were analyzed. The postoperative in-hospital mortality rate was identical for both groups at 1.1 %. The non-elderly group had a significantly higher 4-week discharge rate (91.8 % vs. 84.6 %, p = 0.032). There were no significant differences in overall postoperative complications (p = 0.886). Grade III-IV complications occurred in 16.5 % of elderly and 8.8 % of non-elderly patients, with no significant difference (p = 0.092). The 5-year overall survival rate was significantly lower in the elderly group (47.3 % vs. 69.8 %, p = 0.022), while the 5-year recurrence-free survival rate showed no significant difference (45.7 % vs. 63.6 %, p = 0.119).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Elderly patients undergoing esophagectomy were similar to non-elderly patients in overall complications and in-hospital mortality. Despite a tendency for increased severity of complications and a significantly lower 4-week discharge rate, esophagectomy remains acceptable for elderly patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":11522,"journal":{"name":"Ejso","volume":"51 3","pages":"109542"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ejso","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2024.109542","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: With the global aging, the number of elderly candidates for esophageal resection is increasing. However, studies on esophagectomy in elderly patients have yielded conflicting results, and individuals over 75 years old are frequently excluded from studies on esophageal cancer. This study aimed to analyze perioperative and survival outcomes post-esophagectomy in elderly patients using propensity score matching (PSM).

Materials and methods: Patients with esophageal carcinoma who underwent esophagectomy (2006-2020) were studied. A 1:2 PSM was performed, with matching variables, including operational approach, type of operation, Charlson Comorbidity Index without age score, clinical stage, and treatment modality. Perioperative and survival outcomes were compared between the age groups.

Results: After PSM, 91 elderly and 182 non-elderly patients were analyzed. The postoperative in-hospital mortality rate was identical for both groups at 1.1 %. The non-elderly group had a significantly higher 4-week discharge rate (91.8 % vs. 84.6 %, p = 0.032). There were no significant differences in overall postoperative complications (p = 0.886). Grade III-IV complications occurred in 16.5 % of elderly and 8.8 % of non-elderly patients, with no significant difference (p = 0.092). The 5-year overall survival rate was significantly lower in the elderly group (47.3 % vs. 69.8 %, p = 0.022), while the 5-year recurrence-free survival rate showed no significant difference (45.7 % vs. 63.6 %, p = 0.119).

Conclusions: Elderly patients undergoing esophagectomy were similar to non-elderly patients in overall complications and in-hospital mortality. Despite a tendency for increased severity of complications and a significantly lower 4-week discharge rate, esophagectomy remains acceptable for elderly patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估老年食管癌患者食管切除重建围手术期风险:回顾性倾向评分匹配分析。
导读:随着全球老龄化的加剧,老年人食管切除术的候选者越来越多。然而,关于老年患者食管切除术的研究得出了相互矛盾的结果,75岁以上的个体经常被排除在食管癌的研究之外。本研究旨在使用倾向评分匹配(PSM)分析老年患者食管切除术后围手术期和生存结果。材料与方法:对2006-2020年食管癌行食管切除术的患者进行研究。采用1:2 PSM,匹配变量包括手术方式、手术类型、Charlson合并症指数(不含年龄评分)、临床分期、治疗方式。比较两组患者的围手术期和生存期结果。结果:经PSM治疗的老年患者91例,非老年患者182例。两组术后住院死亡率相同,均为1.1%。非老年组4周出院率明显高于老年组(91.8% vs. 84.6%, p = 0.032)。两组术后总并发症差异无统计学意义(p = 0.886)。老年患者发生III-IV级并发症的比例为16.5%,非老年患者为8.8%,差异无统计学意义(p = 0.092)。老年组5年总生存率显著低于对照组(47.3%比69.8%,p = 0.022),而老年组5年无复发生存率无显著差异(45.7%比63.6%,p = 0.119)。结论:老年食管切除术患者的总并发症和住院死亡率与非老年患者相似。尽管有并发症严重程度增加和4周出院率明显降低的趋势,食管切除术对于老年患者仍然是可以接受的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ejso
Ejso 医学-外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1148
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: JSO - European Journal of Surgical Oncology ("the Journal of Cancer Surgery") is the Official Journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and BASO ~ the Association for Cancer Surgery. The EJSO aims to advance surgical oncology research and practice through the publication of original research articles, review articles, editorials, debates and correspondence.
期刊最新文献
Clinical implications of disappearing pancreatic cancer liver metastases: Lessons from colorectal liver metastases. Severe postoperative pancreatitis following treatment of peritoneal metastases. Risk factors and prognostic factors of pleural metastases in thymic epithelial tumors: A narrative review. Long-term outcomes of hepatopancreatoduodenectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: A comparative study with conventional hepatectomy. Overcoming the technical challenge of venous resection with pancreatectomy: Which factors determine survival?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1