Patient-Level Value Analysis in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Optimizing the Value of Care Delivery.

Abstract

Background: Value is defined as the ratio of patient outcomes to the cost of care. One method to assess value is through patient-level value analysis (PLVA). To our knowledge, this tool has not previously been implemented in the setting of total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purposes of this study were to perform PLVA for a 1-year episode of care among patients undergoing primary THA and to identify characteristics that affect value in a metropolitan health-care system.

Methods: The patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure database of the institution was queried for all primary THAs from 2018 to 2019. The PRO measure that was utilized was the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement (HOOS-JR). Cost was evaluated with use of time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) for a 1-year episode of care (consisting of the day of surgery, inpatient stay, discharge facility, postoperative appointments, and physical therapy). The primary outcome was the 1-year value quotient, or the ratio of the 1-year change in HOOS-JR to the cost of the episode of care (VHOOS). The value quotient was compared among all included patients and evaluated for variables that may affect the overall value of the episode of care.

Results: In total, 480 patients were included in the analysis. The mean improvement in the HOOS-JR was +34.9 ± 16.1 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 33.5, 36.3). The mean cost was $13,835 ± $3,471 (95% CI: $13,524, $14,146). The largest contributor to cost was implants (39.0%), followed by post-recovery care (i.e., inpatient stay and specialized nursing facilities; 24.1%). Change in the HOOS-JR was poorly correlated with the cost of care (r = -0.06; p = 0.19). THAs performed at an ambulatory surgery center (ASC) with discharge to home demonstrated higher value (VHOOS = 0.42) than THAs performed at a hospital with discharge to a rehabilitation facility (VHOOS = 0.15; analysis of variance F-test, p < 0.01).

Conclusions: Our study found that PROs did not correlate with costs in the setting of primary THA. Implants were the largest cost driver. Surgical setting (an ASC versus a hospital) and discharge destination influenced value as well. PLVA is a value measurement tool that can be utilized to optimize components of the care delivery pathway.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.